Reevaluating sentinel lymph node biopsy in older adults with T1 HR+/HER2- breast cancer: a SEER competing risk and nomogram study.

IF 2.9
Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-23 DOI:10.1007/s12282-026-01896-7
Ziqiang Wang, Yangyang Xie, Weijun Zhang, Xue Song, Qiwei Du, Nian Liu, Rongguo Li, Lanlan Gao
{"title":"Reevaluating sentinel lymph node biopsy in older adults with T1 HR+/HER2- breast cancer: a SEER competing risk and nomogram study.","authors":"Ziqiang Wang, Yangyang Xie, Weijun Zhang, Xue Song, Qiwei Du, Nian Liu, Rongguo Li, Lanlan Gao","doi":"10.1007/s12282-026-01896-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard procedure for axillary staging. However, its necessity in older patients (≥ 70 years) with HR+/HER2- T1 breast cancer remains debated in the context of contemporary de-escalation strategies. Existing evidence often incompletely accounts for the competing risk of death in this population. We evaluated the association between SLNB and breast cancer-specific death (BCSD) using real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women aged ≥ 70 years with HR+/HER2- T1 (≤ 20 mm) breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery between 2010 and 2021 were identified from the SEER database and classified into SLNB and No-SLNB groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to estimate subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) for BCSD and other-cause death (OCD). A prognostic nomogram was constructed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 47,838 eligible patients, 37,732 underwent SLNB and 10,106 did not. After PSM, SLNB was associated with a lower 5-year cumulative incidence of BCSD (2.50% vs. 3.50%); differences in OCD were also observed. In multivariable competing risk analysis, SLNB remained independently associated with reduced BCSD (sHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.80). The association was most pronounced in patients aged ≥ 80 years and those with T1c (11-20 mm) tumors, whereas the absolute risk difference was minimal in the 1-5 mm subgroup. The nomogram showed good discrimination (time-dependent AUC up to 0.821 in the training set and 0.857 in the validation set) and calibration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world cohort, SLNB was associated with lower BCSD in older adults with HR+/HER2- T1 breast cancer, particularly in those aged ≥ 80 years or with T1c tumors. While the incremental value of SLNB appears limited in ultra-low-risk groups, age alone should not dictate omission of axillary staging. The nomogram may support individualized decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":520574,"journal":{"name":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","volume":" ","pages":"1160-1172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-026-01896-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard procedure for axillary staging. However, its necessity in older patients (≥ 70 years) with HR+/HER2- T1 breast cancer remains debated in the context of contemporary de-escalation strategies. Existing evidence often incompletely accounts for the competing risk of death in this population. We evaluated the association between SLNB and breast cancer-specific death (BCSD) using real-world data.

Methods: Women aged ≥ 70 years with HR+/HER2- T1 (≤ 20 mm) breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery between 2010 and 2021 were identified from the SEER database and classified into SLNB and No-SLNB groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to estimate subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) for BCSD and other-cause death (OCD). A prognostic nomogram was constructed.

Results: Among 47,838 eligible patients, 37,732 underwent SLNB and 10,106 did not. After PSM, SLNB was associated with a lower 5-year cumulative incidence of BCSD (2.50% vs. 3.50%); differences in OCD were also observed. In multivariable competing risk analysis, SLNB remained independently associated with reduced BCSD (sHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.80). The association was most pronounced in patients aged ≥ 80 years and those with T1c (11-20 mm) tumors, whereas the absolute risk difference was minimal in the 1-5 mm subgroup. The nomogram showed good discrimination (time-dependent AUC up to 0.821 in the training set and 0.857 in the validation set) and calibration.

Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, SLNB was associated with lower BCSD in older adults with HR+/HER2- T1 breast cancer, particularly in those aged ≥ 80 years or with T1c tumors. While the incremental value of SLNB appears limited in ultra-low-risk groups, age alone should not dictate omission of axillary staging. The nomogram may support individualized decision-making.

重新评估老年T1 HR+/HER2-乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检:SEER竞争风险和nomogram研究
背景:前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)是腋窝分期的标准程序。然而,对于年龄较大(≥70岁)的HR+/HER2- T1乳腺癌患者,其必要性在当代降压策略的背景下仍存在争议。现有的证据往往不能完全解释这一人群的竞争死亡风险。我们使用真实数据评估SLNB与乳腺癌特异性死亡(BCSD)之间的关系。方法:从SEER数据库中筛选2010 - 2021年间接受保乳手术的年龄≥70岁的HR+/HER2- T1(≤20 mm)乳腺癌患者,分为SLNB组和No-SLNB组。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和细灰竞争风险模型来估计BCSD和其他原因死亡(OCD)的亚分布风险比(sHRs)。构建预后图。结果:在47,838例符合条件的患者中,37,732例接受了SLNB, 10,106例未接受SLNB。PSM后,SLNB与较低的BCSD 5年累积发病率相关(2.50% vs. 3.50%);强迫症的差异也被观察到。在多变量竞争风险分析中,SLNB仍然与BCSD降低独立相关(sHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.80)。这种关联在年龄≥80岁和T1c (11-20 mm)肿瘤患者中最为明显,而在1-5 mm亚组中绝对风险差异最小。模态图具有良好的判别性(训练集的AUC随时间变化为0.821,验证集的AUC为0.857)和校准。结论:在这个现实世界的队列中,SLNB与老年HR+/HER2- T1乳腺癌患者的BCSD降低相关,特别是年龄≥80岁或T1c肿瘤患者。虽然SLNB的增加价值在超低风险人群中似乎有限,但年龄本身不应决定遗漏腋窝分期。nomogram可能支持个性化决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书