Veera Kivistö, Eero Ylipulli, Heikki Mäntymäki, Antti Ronkainen, Juhana Frösen, Tuomo Thesleff
{"title":"Posterior Cervical Fixation: Accuracy and Safety of Free-Hand Inserted Screws.","authors":"Veera Kivistö, Eero Ylipulli, Heikki Mäntymäki, Antti Ronkainen, Juhana Frösen, Tuomo Thesleff","doi":"10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Posterior fixation of the cervical spine (PFC) is commonly performed with rod-connected screws inserted in the vertebras. Because of the many sensitive structures located adjacent to the vertebras, computer-assisted navigation is often used with PFCs. We assessed safety and efficacy of free-hand placed PFCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified all the patients in our institution between Januray 2006 and December 2016 who underwent a primary PFC for any indication. The postoperative images and medical records were evaluated for possible clinical failures, which was considered as a reoperation to cervical spine within 1 year after primary surgery for any reason, or a new screw-related adverse event including nerve root injury, spinal cord injury, or vertebral artery injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 332 patients and 1476 screws were included in the study. The evaluated screws were primarily pedicle and lateral mass screws. The rate of screw malposition was 12% (171/1476). The overall rate of clinical failure was 16% (52/332) and was significantly higher in patients with screw malposition than in those without malposition (24% vs 12%, <i>P</i> = .03). The rate of screw insertion-related clinical failure was 6.0% (20/332). The C7 pedicle seemed to be more prone to screw malposition than other locations (26/86, 30%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical failure after posterior cervical spine fixation occurs significantly more frequently in patients with screw malposition compared with those without malposition. The overall rate of screw insertion-related clinical failure was 6.0%. These findings suggest that improving screw placement accuracy may reduce the risk of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":74298,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery practice","volume":"7 4","pages":"e000273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13391128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Posterior fixation of the cervical spine (PFC) is commonly performed with rod-connected screws inserted in the vertebras. Because of the many sensitive structures located adjacent to the vertebras, computer-assisted navigation is often used with PFCs. We assessed safety and efficacy of free-hand placed PFCs.
Methods: We retrospectively identified all the patients in our institution between Januray 2006 and December 2016 who underwent a primary PFC for any indication. The postoperative images and medical records were evaluated for possible clinical failures, which was considered as a reoperation to cervical spine within 1 year after primary surgery for any reason, or a new screw-related adverse event including nerve root injury, spinal cord injury, or vertebral artery injury.
Results: In total, 332 patients and 1476 screws were included in the study. The evaluated screws were primarily pedicle and lateral mass screws. The rate of screw malposition was 12% (171/1476). The overall rate of clinical failure was 16% (52/332) and was significantly higher in patients with screw malposition than in those without malposition (24% vs 12%, P = .03). The rate of screw insertion-related clinical failure was 6.0% (20/332). The C7 pedicle seemed to be more prone to screw malposition than other locations (26/86, 30%).
Conclusion: Clinical failure after posterior cervical spine fixation occurs significantly more frequently in patients with screw malposition compared with those without malposition. The overall rate of screw insertion-related clinical failure was 6.0%. These findings suggest that improving screw placement accuracy may reduce the risk of complications.
背景和目的:颈椎后路固定(PFC)通常通过椎体内插入棒连接螺钉进行。由于椎体附近有许多敏感结构,计算机辅助导航通常用于pfc。我们评估了徒手放置PFCs的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析我院2006年1月至2016年12月期间因任何适应症接受原发性PFC的所有患者。评估术后图像和医疗记录是否存在可能的临床失败,包括原发性手术后1年内因任何原因再次进行颈椎手术,或出现新的螺钉相关不良事件,包括神经根损伤、脊髓损伤或椎动脉损伤。结果:共纳入332例患者和1476枚螺钉。评估的螺钉主要是椎弓根螺钉和侧块螺钉。螺钉错位率为12%(171/1476)。总体临床失败率为16%(52/332),螺钉错位患者明显高于无螺钉错位患者(24% vs 12%, P = 0.03)。螺钉置入相关的临床失败率为6.0%(20/332)。C7椎弓根似乎比其他位置更容易发生螺钉错位(26/ 86,30 %)。结论:颈椎后路固定失败在螺钉错位患者中的发生率明显高于无螺钉错位患者。螺钉置入相关临床失败率为6.0%。这些研究结果表明,提高螺钉放置精度可以降低并发症的风险。