{"title":"Prognostic value of day 10 mobilization status for ambulation at hospital discharge in critically ill patients: a historical cohort study in Japan.","authors":"Tsubasa Watanabe, Masatoshi Hanada, Yudai Yano, Masato Oikawa, Yosuke Morimoto, Takuya Fukushima, Hiroki Nagura, Yasutomo Tanaka, Rina Takeuchi, Terumitsu Sawai, Motohiro Sekino, Ryo Kozu","doi":"10.4266/acc.003775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critically ill patients often have long-lasting limitations in activities of daily living, particularly in walking ability. Although early mobilization increases the likelihood of independent ambulation at hospital discharge, the timing at which different mobilization levels become associated with ambulatory recovery is unclear. This study describes the timing for achieving several mobilization levels and its associations with ambulatory recovery at hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients were divided into a regained group, composed of patients whose ambulation recovered to pre-intensive care unit (ICU) admission levels by hospital discharge, and a non-regained group. Multivariable logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to examine the association between the timing of mobilization (standing, marching in place, and assisted walking) and regained ambulation at hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 295 patients were included, and 223 (76%) of them had regained ambulation at hospital discharge. The adjusted odds ratio for standing peaked on day 10 after ICU admission (odds ratio, 5.61; 95% CI, 2.21-17.76) and declined thereafter. The optimal cutoff time linking marching in place and walking with assistance to regained ambulation was also day 10 after ICU admission (marching in place: area under the curve [AUC], 0.78; sensitivity, 0.83; specificity, 0.64; and walking with assistance: AUC, 0.79; sensitivity, 0.77; specificity, 0.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that mobility status on day 10 after ICU admission can serve as a pragmatic marker for identifying patients at risk of poor ambulatory recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":44118,"journal":{"name":"Acute and Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"670-680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13575390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.003775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Critically ill patients often have long-lasting limitations in activities of daily living, particularly in walking ability. Although early mobilization increases the likelihood of independent ambulation at hospital discharge, the timing at which different mobilization levels become associated with ambulatory recovery is unclear. This study describes the timing for achieving several mobilization levels and its associations with ambulatory recovery at hospital discharge.
Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients were divided into a regained group, composed of patients whose ambulation recovered to pre-intensive care unit (ICU) admission levels by hospital discharge, and a non-regained group. Multivariable logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to examine the association between the timing of mobilization (standing, marching in place, and assisted walking) and regained ambulation at hospital discharge.
Results: In total, 295 patients were included, and 223 (76%) of them had regained ambulation at hospital discharge. The adjusted odds ratio for standing peaked on day 10 after ICU admission (odds ratio, 5.61; 95% CI, 2.21-17.76) and declined thereafter. The optimal cutoff time linking marching in place and walking with assistance to regained ambulation was also day 10 after ICU admission (marching in place: area under the curve [AUC], 0.78; sensitivity, 0.83; specificity, 0.64; and walking with assistance: AUC, 0.79; sensitivity, 0.77; specificity, 0.68).
Conclusions: The findings suggest that mobility status on day 10 after ICU admission can serve as a pragmatic marker for identifying patients at risk of poor ambulatory recovery.
背景:危重患者通常在日常生活活动,特别是行走能力方面存在长期限制。虽然早期活动增加了出院时独立活动的可能性,但不同活动水平与活动恢复相关的时间尚不清楚。本研究描述了实现几个动员水平的时间及其与出院时门诊康复的关系。方法:在本单中心回顾性队列研究中,将患者分为康复组和非康复组。康复组由出院时活动能力恢复到ICU入院前水平的患者组成。采用多变量logistic回归分析和受试者工作特征曲线分析来检验活动时间(站立、原地踏步和辅助行走)与出院时重新活动之间的关系。结果:共纳入295例患者,其中223例(76%)出院时恢复了活动能力。站立的校正优势比在ICU入院后第10天达到峰值(优势比5.61;95% CI 2.21-17.76),此后下降。连接原地行走和辅助行走与恢复活动的最佳截止时间也是在ICU入院后第10天(原地行走:曲线下面积[AUC], 0.78;敏感性,0.83;特异性,0.64;辅助行走:AUC, 0.79;敏感性,0.77;特异性,0.68)。结论:研究结果表明,ICU入院后第10天的活动能力状况可作为识别患者动态恢复不良风险的实用指标。