Capturing Perceived Utility from Qualitative Studies of Genomic Sequencing: Translating a Conceptual Model into a Working Codebook.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-22 DOI:10.1080/23294515.2026.2691711
Betty Cohn, Tesla Theoryn, Olivia Sommerland, Priyanka Murali, Joon-Ho Yu, Kailyn Anderson, Kirsty McWalter, Britt Johnson, Dan Doherty, Michael J Bamshad, Katherine E MacDuffie
{"title":"Capturing Perceived Utility from Qualitative Studies of Genomic Sequencing: Translating a Conceptual Model into a Working Codebook.","authors":"Betty Cohn, Tesla Theoryn, Olivia Sommerland, Priyanka Murali, Joon-Ho Yu, Kailyn Anderson, Kirsty McWalter, Britt Johnson, Dan Doherty, Michael J Bamshad, Katherine E MacDuffie","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2026.2691711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As genomic sequencing (GS) is integrated into clinical medicine, understanding how patients and families perceive its utility is critical. Conceptual models for perceived utility have been developed, however, direct application of such models to independently-collected qualitative data remains rare. To fill this gap, we translated a comprehensive model of perceived utility (Smith et al. 2022) into a codebook and revised it <i>via</i> application to a qualitative dataset capturing parent-reported utility of GS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the domains and subdomains from Smith et al.'s conceptual model, we developed an initial codebook. We tested the derived codebook on data from 40 interviews with parents of children enrolled in SeqFirst, a research study offering GS for critically ill newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit and young children (<3 years) with unexplained developmental differences. Four coders independently applied the codebook. We addressed ambiguities through memoing and refined definitions <i>via</i> study team consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resulting codebook includes all five of Smith et al.'s (2022) domains: clinical, emotional, behavioral, cognitive, and social utility. We renamed and relocated several subdomains to add additional clarity in coding decisions, and developed definitions for all subdomain codes. The final codebook is included as a resource for future research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study translates a conceptual framework of perceived utility of GS into a practical codebook for qualitative research. Our intent is to facilitate conceptually-grounded, replicable coding across studies and settings, supporting both inductive and deductive analyses. Applying this codebook can enhance comparability of qualitative findings, inform refinement of conceptual models, and guide the further development of patient-centered measures of GS utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"129-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2026.2691711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: As genomic sequencing (GS) is integrated into clinical medicine, understanding how patients and families perceive its utility is critical. Conceptual models for perceived utility have been developed, however, direct application of such models to independently-collected qualitative data remains rare. To fill this gap, we translated a comprehensive model of perceived utility (Smith et al. 2022) into a codebook and revised it via application to a qualitative dataset capturing parent-reported utility of GS.

Methods: Using the domains and subdomains from Smith et al.'s conceptual model, we developed an initial codebook. We tested the derived codebook on data from 40 interviews with parents of children enrolled in SeqFirst, a research study offering GS for critically ill newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit and young children (<3 years) with unexplained developmental differences. Four coders independently applied the codebook. We addressed ambiguities through memoing and refined definitions via study team consensus.

Results: The resulting codebook includes all five of Smith et al.'s (2022) domains: clinical, emotional, behavioral, cognitive, and social utility. We renamed and relocated several subdomains to add additional clarity in coding decisions, and developed definitions for all subdomain codes. The final codebook is included as a resource for future research.

Conclusions: This study translates a conceptual framework of perceived utility of GS into a practical codebook for qualitative research. Our intent is to facilitate conceptually-grounded, replicable coding across studies and settings, supporting both inductive and deductive analyses. Applying this codebook can enhance comparability of qualitative findings, inform refinement of conceptual models, and guide the further development of patient-centered measures of GS utility.

从基因组测序的定性研究中获取感知效用:将概念模型转化为工作代码本。
简介:随着基因组测序(GS)融入临床医学,了解患者和家属如何看待其效用至关重要。已经开发了感知效用的概念模型,然而,将这些模型直接应用于独立收集的定性数据仍然很少。为了填补这一空白,我们将感知效用的综合模型(Smith et al. 2022)转换为代码本,并通过应用定性数据集(捕获父母报告的GS效用)对其进行了修订。方法:利用Smith等人概念模型中的域和子域,我们开发了一个初始码本。我们对40位SeqFirst儿童家长的访谈数据进行了测试,SeqFirst是一项研究,为新生儿重症监护病房的危重新生儿和幼儿提供GS(通过研究团队共识)。结果:生成的密码本包括Smith等人(2022)的所有五个领域:临床、情感、行为、认知和社会效用。我们重命名和重新定位了几个子域,以增加编码决策的额外清晰度,并为所有子域代码开发了定义。最后的密码本作为未来研究的资源。结论:本研究将感知GS效用的概念框架转化为定性研究的实用代码本。我们的目的是在研究和设置中促进基于概念的、可复制的编码,支持归纳和演绎分析。应用该代码本可以增强定性结果的可比性,为概念模型的改进提供信息,并指导以患者为中心的GS效用测量的进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书