Flexible Workplaces and Postpandemic Business Challenges: An Analysis of Latin American Workers by Gender, Age, and Socioeconomic Level

IF 4.4 Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
IEEE Engineering Management Review Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1109/EMR.2025.3567202
Victoria Cabrera-García;Ximena Campos-García;Lina María Acuña-Arango;María del Carmen Docal-Millán;Fernando Riveros-Munévar
{"title":"Flexible Workplaces and Postpandemic Business Challenges: An Analysis of Latin American Workers by Gender, Age, and Socioeconomic Level","authors":"Victoria Cabrera-García;Ximena Campos-García;Lina María Acuña-Arango;María del Carmen Docal-Millán;Fernando Riveros-Munévar","doi":"10.1109/EMR.2025.3567202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated labor flexibility and the rise of innovative business models, driven by digital transformation and the need for adaptability. This shift necessitated the development of new models, policies, and guidelines to address global expansion and work–life balance, presenting organizations with novel challenges. This study investigated the work–life balance, resilience, and coping strategies of 3302 workers across five Latin American countries (Argentina, Perú, Colombia, Honduras, and México) in the context of these emerging flexible work arrangements. The findings indicate that 38.5% of workers experienced improved work–life balance with remote or hybrid work, and 49.5% reported increased productivity. However, challenges emerged, with 34.1% citing difficulties in time management, 39.7% reporting blurred work–life boundaries, and 36.9% finding it harder to take breaks. Gender differences were observed in resilience and coping mechanisms: men exhibited higher resilience, and favored cognitive restructuring and spiritual support, while women relied more on family support and acceptance of help. Notably, no significant gender differences were found in work–life balance or social support. The study suggests that flexible work modalities positively influence employee well-being. However, this flexibility necessitates a reevaluation of business and operational models, including a thorough analysis of work–life balance conditions, considering employees’ resilience and coping strategies within the specific productive and organizational context.","PeriodicalId":35585,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Engineering Management Review","volume":"54 3","pages":"51-65"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Engineering Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10989230/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated labor flexibility and the rise of innovative business models, driven by digital transformation and the need for adaptability. This shift necessitated the development of new models, policies, and guidelines to address global expansion and work–life balance, presenting organizations with novel challenges. This study investigated the work–life balance, resilience, and coping strategies of 3302 workers across five Latin American countries (Argentina, Perú, Colombia, Honduras, and México) in the context of these emerging flexible work arrangements. The findings indicate that 38.5% of workers experienced improved work–life balance with remote or hybrid work, and 49.5% reported increased productivity. However, challenges emerged, with 34.1% citing difficulties in time management, 39.7% reporting blurred work–life boundaries, and 36.9% finding it harder to take breaks. Gender differences were observed in resilience and coping mechanisms: men exhibited higher resilience, and favored cognitive restructuring and spiritual support, while women relied more on family support and acceptance of help. Notably, no significant gender differences were found in work–life balance or social support. The study suggests that flexible work modalities positively influence employee well-being. However, this flexibility necessitates a reevaluation of business and operational models, including a thorough analysis of work–life balance conditions, considering employees’ resilience and coping strategies within the specific productive and organizational context.
灵活的工作场所和大流行后的商业挑战:按性别、年龄和社会经济水平对拉丁美洲工人的分析
在数字化转型和适应性需求的推动下,2019冠状病毒病大流行加速了劳动力灵活性和创新商业模式的兴起。这种转变需要开发新的模式、政策和指导方针来解决全球扩张和工作与生活的平衡,这给组织带来了新的挑战。本研究调查了来自五个拉丁美洲国家(阿根廷、Perú、哥伦比亚、洪都拉斯和墨西哥)的3302名工人在这些新兴的灵活工作安排背景下的工作与生活平衡、弹性和应对策略。调查结果显示,38.5%的员工表示远程或混合工作改善了工作与生活的平衡,49.5%的员工表示生产率提高了。然而,挑战也随之而来,34.1%的人表示时间管理困难,39.7%的人表示工作与生活的界限模糊,36.9%的人觉得很难休息。在心理弹性和应对机制方面存在性别差异:男性表现出更高的心理弹性,倾向于认知重构和精神支持,而女性更依赖于家庭支持和接受帮助。值得注意的是,在工作生活平衡和社会支持方面,没有发现显著的性别差异。研究表明,灵活的工作方式对员工的幸福感有积极的影响。然而,这种灵活性需要对业务和运营模式进行重新评估,包括对工作与生活平衡状况的彻底分析,考虑员工在特定生产和组织环境下的适应能力和应对策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Engineering Management Review
IEEE Engineering Management Review Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Reprints articles from other publications of significant interest to members. The papers are aimed at those engaged in managing research, development, or engineering activities. Reprints make it possible for the readers to receive the best of today"s literature without having to subscribe to and read other periodicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书