Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Failure: An Update on Failure Analysis, Risk Factors, and Surgical Strategies.

IF 0.9
Anja M Wackerle, Sebastian Siebenlist, Knut Beitzel, Andrea Achtnich
{"title":"Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Failure: An Update on Failure Analysis, Risk Factors, and Surgical Strategies.","authors":"Anja M Wackerle, Sebastian Siebenlist, Knut Beitzel, Andrea Achtnich","doi":"10.1055/a-2862-8960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) presents a considerable challenge - due to its technical complexity, variable clinical presentations, and the interplay of multiple risk factors and concomitant pathologies. Optimal treatment requires a thorough analysis of the causes of failure. The preoperative evaluation should include full-leg radiographs, lateral X-rays of the entire lower leg, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess soft tissue pathologies, and computed tomography (CT) to evaluate tunnel position and tunnel widening. Graft failure is usually multifactorial and may be related to technical, biological, demographic, or biomechanical causes. Technical issues include malpositioning of the tunnels, unaddressed primary instabilities, fixation failure, or inadequate graft tensioning. Biological factors comprise impaired graft incorporation and infections. Biomechanical and anatomical factors-such as increased posterior tibial slope (PTS), coronal plane malalignment, or persistent peripheral or rotational instabilities-must also be recognised and addressed. For this purpose, additional surgical techniques are available - such as slope-reducing osteotomy, varus and valgus osteotomies, as well as lateral extra-articular tenodesis. A successful revision ACL reconstruction is based on a comprehensive analysis of the underlying causes, individually tailored surgical strategies, correction of modifiable predisposing factors, and realistic patient counseling. These measures are crucial for achieving good functional outcomes and long-term stability, while enabling a safe return to the desired level of activity without recurrent injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":94274,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2862-8960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) presents a considerable challenge - due to its technical complexity, variable clinical presentations, and the interplay of multiple risk factors and concomitant pathologies. Optimal treatment requires a thorough analysis of the causes of failure. The preoperative evaluation should include full-leg radiographs, lateral X-rays of the entire lower leg, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess soft tissue pathologies, and computed tomography (CT) to evaluate tunnel position and tunnel widening. Graft failure is usually multifactorial and may be related to technical, biological, demographic, or biomechanical causes. Technical issues include malpositioning of the tunnels, unaddressed primary instabilities, fixation failure, or inadequate graft tensioning. Biological factors comprise impaired graft incorporation and infections. Biomechanical and anatomical factors-such as increased posterior tibial slope (PTS), coronal plane malalignment, or persistent peripheral or rotational instabilities-must also be recognised and addressed. For this purpose, additional surgical techniques are available - such as slope-reducing osteotomy, varus and valgus osteotomies, as well as lateral extra-articular tenodesis. A successful revision ACL reconstruction is based on a comprehensive analysis of the underlying causes, individually tailored surgical strategies, correction of modifiable predisposing factors, and realistic patient counseling. These measures are crucial for achieving good functional outcomes and long-term stability, while enabling a safe return to the desired level of activity without recurrent injury.

前交叉韧带移植失败:失败分析、危险因素和手术策略的最新进展。
摘要:前交叉韧带(ACL)翻修重建由于其技术复杂性,临床表现多变,多种危险因素和伴随病理的相互作用,提出了相当大的挑战。最佳的治疗需要对失败的原因进行彻底的分析。术前评估应包括全腿x线片,整个下肢侧位x线片,磁共振成像(MRI)评估软组织病理,计算机断层扫描(CT)评估隧道位置和隧道拓宽。移植物失败通常是多因素的,可能与技术、生物学、人口统计学或生物力学原因有关。技术问题包括隧道错位、未解决的主要不稳定、固定失败或接枝张力不足。生物因素包括移植物结合受损和感染。生物力学和解剖学因素,如胫骨后坡(PTS)增加,冠状面错位,或持续的外周或旋转不稳定,也必须被识别和解决。为此,可采用其他手术技术,如减坡截骨术、内翻和外翻截骨术以及外侧关节外肌腱固定术。成功的前交叉韧带重建是基于对潜在原因的全面分析,个体化的手术策略,对可改变的易感因素的纠正,以及切合实际的患者咨询。这些措施对于获得良好的功能结果和长期稳定性至关重要,同时能够安全地恢复到理想的活动水平,而不会造成复发性损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书