Pain response to re-irradiation for non-bone metastatic lesions: a single-institution retrospective study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Kenji Makita, Yuichi Hiroshima, Masaki Nakamura, Hidenari Hirata, Masashi Wakabayashi, Satoshi Saito, Sadamoto Zenda
{"title":"Pain response to re-irradiation for non-bone metastatic lesions: a single-institution retrospective study.","authors":"Kenji Makita, Yuichi Hiroshima, Masaki Nakamura, Hidenari Hirata, Masashi Wakabayashi, Satoshi Saito, Sadamoto Zenda","doi":"10.1007/s10147-026-03151-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence regarding palliative re-irradiation (re-RT) for persistent or recurrent pain from non-bone metastatic lesions remains limited. This study evaluated pain response after re-RT in patients with persistent or recurrent painful non-bone metastases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients with persistent or recurrent painful non-bone metastases who underwent re-RT to the same previously irradiated lesion between January 2013 and October 2025 and had an evaluable pain assessment at 4 weeks, defined as 28 ± 7 days after re-RT initiation. Pain response was evaluated based on changes in pain scores and morphine dosage. Assessments were performed at 7 ± 3, 28 ± 7, 56 ± 7, and 84 ± 7 days after the initiation of re-RT, corresponding to approximately 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine patients were included. The median follow-up was 128 days (interquartile range, 89-221 days). Re-RT regimens were 8 Gy in one fraction in 26 patients (67%), 20 Gy in five fractions in 12 (31%), and 30 Gy in 10 fractions in one (3%). The best overall pain response was observed in 26 patients (67%), including complete response in seven (18%) and partial response in 19 (49%). Among responders, 89% (23/26) achieved response within 4 weeks. The overall response rates were 25% (9/36) at 1 week, 51% (20/39) at 4 weeks, 63% (19/30) at 8 weeks, and 40% (10/25) at 12 weeks, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this small retrospective cohort, approximately half of the patients achieved pain relief after palliative re-RT, and most observed responses occurred within 4 weeks. These preliminary findings warrant further evaluation in larger prospective studies using standardized pain and analgesic assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2435-2440"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-026-03151-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence regarding palliative re-irradiation (re-RT) for persistent or recurrent pain from non-bone metastatic lesions remains limited. This study evaluated pain response after re-RT in patients with persistent or recurrent painful non-bone metastases.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with persistent or recurrent painful non-bone metastases who underwent re-RT to the same previously irradiated lesion between January 2013 and October 2025 and had an evaluable pain assessment at 4 weeks, defined as 28 ± 7 days after re-RT initiation. Pain response was evaluated based on changes in pain scores and morphine dosage. Assessments were performed at 7 ± 3, 28 ± 7, 56 ± 7, and 84 ± 7 days after the initiation of re-RT, corresponding to approximately 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively.

Results: Thirty-nine patients were included. The median follow-up was 128 days (interquartile range, 89-221 days). Re-RT regimens were 8 Gy in one fraction in 26 patients (67%), 20 Gy in five fractions in 12 (31%), and 30 Gy in 10 fractions in one (3%). The best overall pain response was observed in 26 patients (67%), including complete response in seven (18%) and partial response in 19 (49%). Among responders, 89% (23/26) achieved response within 4 weeks. The overall response rates were 25% (9/36) at 1 week, 51% (20/39) at 4 weeks, 63% (19/30) at 8 weeks, and 40% (10/25) at 12 weeks, respectively.

Conclusion: In this small retrospective cohort, approximately half of the patients achieved pain relief after palliative re-RT, and most observed responses occurred within 4 weeks. These preliminary findings warrant further evaluation in larger prospective studies using standardized pain and analgesic assessments.

非骨转移性病变再照射后的疼痛反应:一项单机构回顾性研究。
背景:关于姑息性再照射(re-RT)治疗非骨转移性病变引起的持续性或复发性疼痛的证据仍然有限。本研究评估了持续性或复发性疼痛非骨转移患者的再放疗后疼痛反应。方法:我们回顾性分析了2013年1月至2025年10月期间对同一先前照射病灶进行重新放疗的持续性或复发性疼痛非骨转移患者,并在重新放疗开始后4周(定义为28±7天)进行了可评估的疼痛评估。根据疼痛评分和吗啡剂量的变化来评估疼痛反应。评估在re-RT开始后7±3、28±7、56±7和84±7天进行,分别对应大约1、4、8和12周。结果:纳入39例患者。中位随访时间为128天(四分位数间距89-221天)。26例(67%)患者接受1次8 Gy的Re-RT治疗,12例(31%)患者接受5次20 Gy的Re-RT治疗,1例(3%)患者接受10次30 Gy的Re-RT治疗。26例患者(67%)观察到最佳的总体疼痛缓解,包括7例完全缓解(18%)和19例部分缓解(49%)。在应答者中,89%(23/26)在4周内达到应答。总有效率分别为1周25%(9/36),4周51%(20/39),8周63%(19/30),12周40%(10/25)。结论:在这个小型回顾性队列中,大约有一半的患者在姑息性再放疗后实现了疼痛缓解,大多数观察到的缓解发生在4周内。这些初步发现值得在使用标准化疼痛和镇痛评估的更大规模前瞻性研究中进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书