rAAV production cost analysis: Indication-specific cost per dose and reduction strategies

IF 5.9 3区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Min Tae Park, Dan Matuszek, Angela Andaluz, Seyed Pouria Motevalian
{"title":"rAAV production cost analysis: Indication-specific cost per dose and reduction strategies","authors":"Min Tae Park, Dan Matuszek, Angela Andaluz, Seyed Pouria Motevalian","doi":"10.1038/s41434-026-00631-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors underpin many approved and late-stage gene therapies, yet manufacturing costs remain a major driver of therapy price. Here, we present the first comprehensive, platform-resolved cost analysis of rAAV production across three industrially relevant suspension platforms: transient transfection, baculovirus infection, and producer cell line (PCL). Using a bottom-up model, we decompose total cost-of-goods (COGs) into upstream, downstream, drug product, and quality control contributions at bioreactor scales from 50 L to 2000 L. We show that, on a per-batch basis, baculovirus infection is the most cost-efficient platform, followed by transient transfection and PCLs however, when costs are normalized to vector titer (cost per 1 × 10¹² vg), the ranking shifts, with transient transfection becoming the lowest-cost platform under the modeled assumptions, followed by baculovirus infection and PCL platforms, underscoring the dominant influence of productivity on unit cost. We identify platform-specific cost drivers—plasmids, transfection reagent, and media in transient transfection; media and perfusion consumables in PCL platforms; and affinity capture chromatography in baculovirus processes—with buffer preparation consistently representing the largest downstream material cost across platforms. We further quantify the impact of process development levers: transfection optimization and perfusion-based intensification reduce cost per dose by up to an order of magnitude, whereas affinity resin reuse and capsid enrichment strategies provide modest, incremental savings. Incorporating indication-specific annual viral genome demand reveals how process optimization and scale-up together reduce batch burden and lower dose cost by up to two orders of magnitude, suggesting the potential for improved supply feasibility, even for high-dose neuromuscular indications, under the modeled assumptions of productivity improvement and process optimization. Together, these results provide a quantitative framework linking platform choice, process scale, and unit operations to rAAV manufacturing COGs.","PeriodicalId":12699,"journal":{"name":"Gene Therapy","volume":"33 5","pages":"559-570"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41434-026-00631-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gene Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41434-026-00631-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors underpin many approved and late-stage gene therapies, yet manufacturing costs remain a major driver of therapy price. Here, we present the first comprehensive, platform-resolved cost analysis of rAAV production across three industrially relevant suspension platforms: transient transfection, baculovirus infection, and producer cell line (PCL). Using a bottom-up model, we decompose total cost-of-goods (COGs) into upstream, downstream, drug product, and quality control contributions at bioreactor scales from 50 L to 2000 L. We show that, on a per-batch basis, baculovirus infection is the most cost-efficient platform, followed by transient transfection and PCLs however, when costs are normalized to vector titer (cost per 1 × 10¹² vg), the ranking shifts, with transient transfection becoming the lowest-cost platform under the modeled assumptions, followed by baculovirus infection and PCL platforms, underscoring the dominant influence of productivity on unit cost. We identify platform-specific cost drivers—plasmids, transfection reagent, and media in transient transfection; media and perfusion consumables in PCL platforms; and affinity capture chromatography in baculovirus processes—with buffer preparation consistently representing the largest downstream material cost across platforms. We further quantify the impact of process development levers: transfection optimization and perfusion-based intensification reduce cost per dose by up to an order of magnitude, whereas affinity resin reuse and capsid enrichment strategies provide modest, incremental savings. Incorporating indication-specific annual viral genome demand reveals how process optimization and scale-up together reduce batch burden and lower dose cost by up to two orders of magnitude, suggesting the potential for improved supply feasibility, even for high-dose neuromuscular indications, under the modeled assumptions of productivity improvement and process optimization. Together, these results provide a quantitative framework linking platform choice, process scale, and unit operations to rAAV manufacturing COGs.
rAAV生产成本分析:每剂特定适应症成本和降低策略。
重组腺相关病毒(rAAV)载体是许多已获批准和处于晚期的基因治疗的基础,但制造成本仍然是治疗价格的主要驱动因素。在这里,我们提出了第一个全面的、平台分解的rAAV生产成本分析,横跨三种工业相关的悬浮平台:瞬时转染、杆状病毒感染和生产者细胞系(PCL)。使用自下而上的模型,我们将总商品成本(COGs)分解为上游、下游、药品和质量控制对生物反应器规模的贡献,从50 L到2000 L。我们表明,在每批的基础上,杆状病毒感染是最具成本效益的平台,其次是瞬时转染和pcl,然而,当成本归一化为载体滴度(每1 × 10¹²vg的成本)时,排名发生了变化。在模型假设下,瞬时转染成为成本最低的平台,其次是杆状病毒感染和PCL平台,强调了生产力对单位成本的主导影响。我们确定了平台特定的成本驱动因素——质粒、转染试剂和瞬时转染的介质;PCL平台介质及灌注耗材;杆状病毒过程中的亲和捕获层析-缓冲液制备始终代表着跨平台的最大下游材料成本。我们进一步量化了工艺发展杠杆的影响:转染优化和基于灌注的强化可将每剂量成本降低多达一个数量级,而亲和树脂再利用和衣壳富集策略可提供适度的增量节省。结合特定适应症的年度病毒基因组需求,揭示了工艺优化和规模扩大如何共同减少批量负担和降低剂量成本,最多可达两个数量级,这表明,在生产率提高和工艺优化的建模假设下,即使是高剂量神经肌肉适应症,也有可能提高供应可行性。总之,这些结果提供了一个定量框架,将平台选择、工艺规模和单元操作与rAAV制造cog联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gene Therapy
Gene Therapy 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Gene Therapy covers both the research and clinical applications of novel therapeutic techniques based on a genetic component. Over the last few decades, significant advances in technologies ranging from identifying novel genetic targets that cause disease through to clinical studies, which show therapeutic benefit, have elevated this multidisciplinary field to the forefront of modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书