G. Burcet, A. Aubanell, A. Roque, J.L. Reyes-Juarez, F. Valente, G. Teixidó-Tura, J. Rodríguez-Palomares, H. Cuellar-Calabria
{"title":"Medición de la raíz aórtica por ATCC: concordancia con ecocardiografía transtorácica","authors":"G. Burcet, A. Aubanell, A. Roque, J.L. Reyes-Juarez, F. Valente, G. Teixidó-Tura, J. Rodríguez-Palomares, H. Cuellar-Calabria","doi":"10.1016/j.rx.2025.501747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aim</h3><div>Aortic root (AoR) dilatation is a condition that requires monitoring of its growth through serial imaging studies in order to determine appropriate treatment. Systematic differences in AoR measurements have been reported between transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cross-sectional imaging techniques. The aim of this study was to determine which AoR measurement-performed using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with tricuspid aortic valves-shows the best correlation with the standard measurement obtained by TTE.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 110 patients who underwent both CCTA and TTE within a six-month interval at our institution, including an equal number of patients with and without AoR dilatation. On the transverse plane of the AoR in CCTA, the following measurements were taken: cusp-to-commissure, cusp-to-cusp, area, area-derived diameter (ADD) and anteroposterior diameter (APD). CCTA measurements showed excellent correlation with TTE (p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001), with the highest degree of agreement observed for ADD and APD (both p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->.001).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>APD measurements did not differ significantly from those obtained by TTE in any group (overall p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.451; non-dilated AoR p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.427; dilated AoR p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.091), in contrast to the other measurements, including ADD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The APD measurement obtained by CCTA proved to be equivalent to that obtained by TTE, easy to perform and highly reproducible. Future research may establish APD as the reference measurement for comparing results between both techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":31509,"journal":{"name":"RADIOLOGIA","volume":"68 4","pages":"Article 501747"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RADIOLOGIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033833825001316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aim
Aortic root (AoR) dilatation is a condition that requires monitoring of its growth through serial imaging studies in order to determine appropriate treatment. Systematic differences in AoR measurements have been reported between transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cross-sectional imaging techniques. The aim of this study was to determine which AoR measurement-performed using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with tricuspid aortic valves-shows the best correlation with the standard measurement obtained by TTE.
Material and methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 110 patients who underwent both CCTA and TTE within a six-month interval at our institution, including an equal number of patients with and without AoR dilatation. On the transverse plane of the AoR in CCTA, the following measurements were taken: cusp-to-commissure, cusp-to-cusp, area, area-derived diameter (ADD) and anteroposterior diameter (APD). CCTA measurements showed excellent correlation with TTE (p < .001), with the highest degree of agreement observed for ADD and APD (both p < .001).
Results
APD measurements did not differ significantly from those obtained by TTE in any group (overall p = .451; non-dilated AoR p = .427; dilated AoR p = .091), in contrast to the other measurements, including ADD.
Conclusion
The APD measurement obtained by CCTA proved to be equivalent to that obtained by TTE, easy to perform and highly reproducible. Future research may establish APD as the reference measurement for comparing results between both techniques.
RADIOLOGIARADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍:
La mejor revista para conocer de primera mano los originales más relevantes en la especialidad y las revisiones, casos y notas clínicas de mayor interés profesional. Además es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Radiología Médica.