Machine learning-based prediction of aortic microstructural changes using renal pathological indicators under chronic unpredictable mild stress

IF 7.8 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Intelligent medicine Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.imed.2025.06.002
Qi Wang, Donglu Liu, Jinrun Liu, Peijuan Tang, Xuedong Wang, Qian Liu, Bingge Fan, Min Hu, Lingbing Meng
{"title":"Machine learning-based prediction of aortic microstructural changes using renal pathological indicators under chronic unpredictable mild stress","authors":"Qi Wang,&nbsp;Donglu Liu,&nbsp;Jinrun Liu,&nbsp;Peijuan Tang,&nbsp;Xuedong Wang,&nbsp;Qian Liu,&nbsp;Bingge Fan,&nbsp;Min Hu,&nbsp;Lingbing Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.imed.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chronic psychological stress is an increasingly recognized risk factor for both renal and cardiovascular diseases, yet the mechanisms linking stress exposure to vascular remodeling remain poorly defined. We aimed to investigate whether renal pathological markers can predict abdominal aortic microstructural changes under chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) and to evaluate the predictive value of these markers using machine learning models in both normal and metabolically compromised murine models.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 60 male mice, including 30 wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J and 30 ApoE-deficient mice (ApoE<sup>–/–</sup>) were randomized into four groups (<em>n</em> =15 per group): WT+ normal diet (ND), WT + ND + CUMS, ApoE<sup>–/–</sup> + western diet (WD), and ApoE<sup>–/–</sup> + WD + CUMS. CUMS was administered for 12 weeks. Histopathological assessment of renal and aortic tissues was performed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&amp;E), periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), reticular fiber, and immunohistochemical staining. Expression of sodium-glucose cotransporters (SGLT1 and SGLT2), edema, glycogen content, and abdominal aortic intima-media thickness (AA-IMT) were quantified. Correlation analyses were conducted between renal and vascular parameters. Two machine learning models—support vector machine (SVM) and backpropagation (BP) neural network—were used to evaluate the predictive relationship between renal biomarkers and aortic microstructural alterations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CUMS significantly increased renal SGLT1/SGLT2 expression, edema, and glycogen content in wild-type mice (all <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), along with increased AA-IMT and reduced aortic diameter (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). ApoE<sup>–/–</sup> mice exhibited pronounced aortic remodeling under CUMS, despite no further renal deterioration. Correlation analysis showed a strong association between renal and vascular indicators, particularly in the CUMS + ApoE<sup>–/–</sup> group. Machine learning models demonstrated robust performance in predicting abdominal aorta diameter (AA-D) and AA-IMT based on SGLT1 and SGLT2 levels (SVM R² for AA-D: 0.79, BP network correlation for AA-IMT: 0.99), identifying these markers as early indicators of stress-induced vascular remodeling.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Renal injury biomarkers, particularly SGLT1 and SGLT2, can serve as reliable predictors of abdominal aortic microstructural changes under chronic stress. Integration of machine learning models enhances early risk stratification and provides a novel approach for mechanistic insight into cardiorenal stress responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73400,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent medicine","volume":"6 3","pages":"Pages 336-350"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667102625001329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Chronic psychological stress is an increasingly recognized risk factor for both renal and cardiovascular diseases, yet the mechanisms linking stress exposure to vascular remodeling remain poorly defined. We aimed to investigate whether renal pathological markers can predict abdominal aortic microstructural changes under chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) and to evaluate the predictive value of these markers using machine learning models in both normal and metabolically compromised murine models.

Methods

A total of 60 male mice, including 30 wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J and 30 ApoE-deficient mice (ApoE–/–) were randomized into four groups (n =15 per group): WT+ normal diet (ND), WT + ND + CUMS, ApoE–/– + western diet (WD), and ApoE–/– + WD + CUMS. CUMS was administered for 12 weeks. Histopathological assessment of renal and aortic tissues was performed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), reticular fiber, and immunohistochemical staining. Expression of sodium-glucose cotransporters (SGLT1 and SGLT2), edema, glycogen content, and abdominal aortic intima-media thickness (AA-IMT) were quantified. Correlation analyses were conducted between renal and vascular parameters. Two machine learning models—support vector machine (SVM) and backpropagation (BP) neural network—were used to evaluate the predictive relationship between renal biomarkers and aortic microstructural alterations.

Results

CUMS significantly increased renal SGLT1/SGLT2 expression, edema, and glycogen content in wild-type mice (all P < 0.01), along with increased AA-IMT and reduced aortic diameter (P < 0.05). ApoE–/– mice exhibited pronounced aortic remodeling under CUMS, despite no further renal deterioration. Correlation analysis showed a strong association between renal and vascular indicators, particularly in the CUMS + ApoE–/– group. Machine learning models demonstrated robust performance in predicting abdominal aorta diameter (AA-D) and AA-IMT based on SGLT1 and SGLT2 levels (SVM R² for AA-D: 0.79, BP network correlation for AA-IMT: 0.99), identifying these markers as early indicators of stress-induced vascular remodeling.

Conclusion

Renal injury biomarkers, particularly SGLT1 and SGLT2, can serve as reliable predictors of abdominal aortic microstructural changes under chronic stress. Integration of machine learning models enhances early risk stratification and provides a novel approach for mechanistic insight into cardiorenal stress responses.
基于机器学习的慢性不可预测轻度应激下肾脏病理指标预测主动脉微结构变化
背景:慢性心理应激是肾脏和心血管疾病的一个日益被认可的危险因素,但应激暴露与血管重构之间的机制仍不明确。我们的目的是研究肾脏病理标志物是否可以预测慢性不可预测轻度应激(CUMS)下的腹主动脉微结构变化,并利用机器学习模型在正常和代谢受损的小鼠模型中评估这些标志物的预测价值。方法雄性小鼠60只,其中野生型(WT) C57BL/6J小鼠30只,ApoE-缺陷型(ApoE - / -)小鼠30只,随机分为WT+正常饮食(ND)、WT+ ND + CUMS、ApoE- / - +西方饮食(WD)、ApoE- / - + WD + CUMS 4组(每组n =15)。CUMS治疗12周。采用苏木精和伊红(H&;E)、周期性酸-希夫(PAS)、网状纤维和免疫组织化学染色对肾脏和主动脉组织进行组织病理学评估。量化钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白(SGLT1和SGLT2)的表达、水肿、糖原含量和腹主动脉内膜-中膜厚度(AA-IMT)。对肾脏和血管参数进行相关性分析。使用支持向量机(SVM)和反向传播(BP)神经网络这两种机器学习模型来评估肾脏生物标志物与主动脉微结构改变之间的预测关系。结果scums显著增加野生型小鼠肾脏SGLT1/SGLT2表达、水肿和糖原含量(P < 0.01),增加AA-IMT,减小主动脉直径(P < 0.05)。ApoE - / -小鼠在CUMS下表现出明显的主动脉重塑,尽管肾脏没有进一步恶化。相关性分析显示肾脏和血管指标之间存在很强的相关性,特别是在CUMS + ApoE - / -组。机器学习模型在基于SGLT1和SGLT2水平预测腹主动脉直径(AA-D)和AA-IMT方面表现出稳健的性能(AA-D的SVM R²为0.79,AA-IMT的BP网络相关性为0.99),将这些标记确定为应力诱导血管重构的早期指标。结论肾损伤生物标志物,尤其是SGLT1和SGLT2可作为慢性应激下腹主动脉微结构变化的可靠预测指标。机器学习模型的集成增强了早期风险分层,并为心肾应激反应的机制洞察提供了一种新的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intelligent medicine
Intelligent medicine Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书