Virtual Critical Care for Eastern Ontario-A Cost-Benefit Analysis.

IF 2
Cameron Leafloor, Kwadwo Kyerementeng, Dave Neilipovitz, Melanie Lecours, Scott Millington
{"title":"Virtual Critical Care for Eastern Ontario-A Cost-Benefit Analysis.","authors":"Cameron Leafloor, Kwadwo Kyerementeng, Dave Neilipovitz, Melanie Lecours, Scott Millington","doi":"10.1177/15305627261465202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual critical care (VCC) programs provide remote specialist support to community hospitals caring for critically ill patients, yet Canadian evidence regarding their economic impact remains limited. This study aimed to estimate the cost savings associated with a newly implemented VCC program in Eastern Ontario.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cost-benefit analysis of the first 19 months of a regional VCC program based at a tertiary academic center supporting 13 community hospitals was conducted. All adult patients with an initiated VCC consultation were included. Cost estimates focused on avoided interfacility transfers, transportation costs, and differences in inpatient costs between academic and community hospital settings. Descriptive statistics were used to compare estimated cost savings with program operating costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between April 2023 and October 2024, 473 VCC calls representing 312 unique patient encounters were recorded (298 patients included in analysis). Transfers to larger centers were avoided in 179 cases (60%). Avoided land ambulance transfers were estimated to save $61,101 CAD over the study period. Estimated inpatient cost savings associated with avoided transfers ranged from $687,643 CAD (mean length of stay [LOS]) to $2,681,420 CAD (median LOS), corresponding to monthly savings of $36,191-$141,127 CAD. These savings approached or exceeded the estimated VCC program monthly operating cost.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Eastern Ontario VCC program was associated with substantial estimated cost savings, primarily through avoided transfers and reduced use of high-cost academic intensive care beds. These findings support VCC as a potentially cost-effective health system intervention for supporting critically ill patients in community hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"1052-1057"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15305627261465202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Virtual critical care (VCC) programs provide remote specialist support to community hospitals caring for critically ill patients, yet Canadian evidence regarding their economic impact remains limited. This study aimed to estimate the cost savings associated with a newly implemented VCC program in Eastern Ontario.

Methods: A retrospective cost-benefit analysis of the first 19 months of a regional VCC program based at a tertiary academic center supporting 13 community hospitals was conducted. All adult patients with an initiated VCC consultation were included. Cost estimates focused on avoided interfacility transfers, transportation costs, and differences in inpatient costs between academic and community hospital settings. Descriptive statistics were used to compare estimated cost savings with program operating costs.

Results: Between April 2023 and October 2024, 473 VCC calls representing 312 unique patient encounters were recorded (298 patients included in analysis). Transfers to larger centers were avoided in 179 cases (60%). Avoided land ambulance transfers were estimated to save $61,101 CAD over the study period. Estimated inpatient cost savings associated with avoided transfers ranged from $687,643 CAD (mean length of stay [LOS]) to $2,681,420 CAD (median LOS), corresponding to monthly savings of $36,191-$141,127 CAD. These savings approached or exceeded the estimated VCC program monthly operating cost.

Conclusion: The Eastern Ontario VCC program was associated with substantial estimated cost savings, primarily through avoided transfers and reduced use of high-cost academic intensive care beds. These findings support VCC as a potentially cost-effective health system intervention for supporting critically ill patients in community hospitals.

安大略省东部的虚拟重症监护——成本效益分析。
背景:虚拟重症监护(VCC)计划为社区医院提供远程专家支持,以照顾危重患者,但加拿大关于其经济影响的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在估计安大略省东部新实施的VCC计划所节省的成本。方法:对某三级学术中心支持13家社区医院的区域性VCC项目的前19个月进行回顾性成本效益分析。所有开始VCC咨询的成年患者均被纳入。成本估算侧重于避免设施间转移、运输成本以及学术医院和社区医院之间住院成本的差异。描述性统计用于比较估计的成本节约与项目运行成本。结果:在2023年4月至2024年10月期间,记录了473个VCC呼叫,代表312个独特的患者遭遇(298名患者纳入分析)。179例(60%)避免转移到更大的中心。在研究期间,避免陆上救护车转移估计可节省61,101加元。避免转院所节省的住院费用估计从687,643加元(平均住院时间[LOS])到2,681,420加元(平均住院时间)不等,相当于每月节省36,191- 141,127加元。这些节省接近或超过了VCC计划的每月运营成本。结论:安大略东部的VCC项目主要通过避免转院和减少使用高成本的学术重症监护病床来节省大量的估计成本。这些研究结果支持VCC作为支持社区医院危重患者的潜在具有成本效益的卫生系统干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书