Standardized diagnostic approach for cold agglutinin disease: results from a Delphi-Based Expert Consensus.

Gianluca Ubezio, Wilma Barcellini, Serelina Coluzzi, Bruno Fattizzo, Antonella Matteocci, Andrea Patriarca, Sebastiano S Pergolizzi, Daniele Prati, Nicoletta Revelli, Francesco Fiorin
{"title":"Standardized diagnostic approach for cold agglutinin disease: results from a Delphi-Based Expert Consensus.","authors":"Gianluca Ubezio, Wilma Barcellini, Serelina Coluzzi, Bruno Fattizzo, Antonella Matteocci, Andrea Patriarca, Sebastiano S Pergolizzi, Daniele Prati, Nicoletta Revelli, Francesco Fiorin","doi":"10.2450/BloodTransfus.1314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a rare autoimmune hemolytic anemia characterized by clonal immunoglobulin M (IgM) autoantibodies that activate complement at low temperatures, leading to hemolysis. Diagnostic practices remain inconsistent, with considerable interlaboratory variability and no established guidelines. Objective - To develop a consensus-based diagnostic framework for CAD through a structured Delphi methodology, with the goal of harmonizing laboratory practices across medical centers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 30 experts in classic hematology and transfusion medicine were invited to participate in a two-round, web-based modified Delphi survey; 27 (90%) completed both rounds. A scientific board developed 37 diagnostic statements covering five domains: CAD definition, clinical evaluation, immunohematological testing, and pre-analytical and analytical procedures. Statements were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with consensus defined a priori as a score of 4 or 5 by ≥80% of respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 37 statements achieved consensus, with 36 (97.3%) doing so in Round 1 and the remaining one in Round 2 after re-evaluation. The panel provided recommendations on when to suspect CAD and specified necessary diagnostic tests, including C3d positivity on direct antiglobulin test (DAT) with monospecific antisera and the detection of cold agglutinins in serum. They heavily emphasized the importance of sample handling at 37°C, alongside issuing recommendations on cold agglutinin titration, transfusion management, and immune-hematologic follow-up.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This expert consensus provides a standardized diagnostic approach for CAD, addressing current gaps in clinical and laboratory evaluation. Implementing these recommendations is expected to improve diagnostic accuracy and consistency, facilitating better patient outcomes and national harmonization of practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":520572,"journal":{"name":"Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2450/BloodTransfus.1314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a rare autoimmune hemolytic anemia characterized by clonal immunoglobulin M (IgM) autoantibodies that activate complement at low temperatures, leading to hemolysis. Diagnostic practices remain inconsistent, with considerable interlaboratory variability and no established guidelines. Objective - To develop a consensus-based diagnostic framework for CAD through a structured Delphi methodology, with the goal of harmonizing laboratory practices across medical centers.

Materials and methods: A total of 30 experts in classic hematology and transfusion medicine were invited to participate in a two-round, web-based modified Delphi survey; 27 (90%) completed both rounds. A scientific board developed 37 diagnostic statements covering five domains: CAD definition, clinical evaluation, immunohematological testing, and pre-analytical and analytical procedures. Statements were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with consensus defined a priori as a score of 4 or 5 by ≥80% of respondents.

Results: All 37 statements achieved consensus, with 36 (97.3%) doing so in Round 1 and the remaining one in Round 2 after re-evaluation. The panel provided recommendations on when to suspect CAD and specified necessary diagnostic tests, including C3d positivity on direct antiglobulin test (DAT) with monospecific antisera and the detection of cold agglutinins in serum. They heavily emphasized the importance of sample handling at 37°C, alongside issuing recommendations on cold agglutinin titration, transfusion management, and immune-hematologic follow-up.

Discussion: This expert consensus provides a standardized diagnostic approach for CAD, addressing current gaps in clinical and laboratory evaluation. Implementing these recommendations is expected to improve diagnostic accuracy and consistency, facilitating better patient outcomes and national harmonization of practices.

感冒凝集素病的标准化诊断方法:来自德尔菲专家共识的结果。
背景:冷凝集素病(CAD)是一种罕见的自身免疫性溶血性贫血,其特征是克隆性免疫球蛋白M (IgM)自身抗体在低温下激活补体,导致溶血。诊断实践仍然不一致,有相当大的实验室间差异,没有既定的指南。目的:通过结构化德尔菲方法为CAD开发一个基于共识的诊断框架,目标是协调各医疗中心的实验室实践。材料和方法:共邀请30名经典血液和输血医学专家参加两轮基于网络的改进德尔菲调查;27例(90%)完成两轮治疗。一个科学委员会制定了37项诊断声明,涵盖5个领域:CAD定义、临床评估、免疫血液学测试、分析前和分析程序。陈述以5分的李克特量表进行评分,共识被定义为先验的4或5分,≥80%的受访者。结果:37个陈述全部达成共识,其中36个(97.3%)在第1轮达成共识,其余1个在第2轮重新评估后达成共识。专家组就何时怀疑CAD提供了建议,并规定了必要的诊断试验,包括单特异性抗血清直接抗球蛋白试验(DAT) C3d阳性和血清中冷凝集素的检测。他们着重强调了在37°C下处理样品的重要性,同时发布了关于凝集素冷滴定、输血管理和免疫血液学随访的建议。讨论:这一专家共识为CAD提供了一种标准化的诊断方法,解决了目前临床和实验室评估的差距。实施这些建议预计将提高诊断的准确性和一致性,促进更好的患者结果和全国统一做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书