Impact of a nursing intervention on frailty in people aged 65–75 years in primary care. A pilot clinical trial

Enfermeria clinica (English Edition) Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-20 DOI:10.1016/j.enfcle.2026.502507
Yolanda Rodríguez-Vieira, Vanesa Rojo-Amigo, Carmen Neri Fernández-Pombo
{"title":"Impact of a nursing intervention on frailty in people aged 65–75 years in primary care. A pilot clinical trial","authors":"Yolanda Rodríguez-Vieira,&nbsp;Vanesa Rojo-Amigo,&nbsp;Carmen Neri Fernández-Pombo","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcle.2026.502507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyse whether an intervention carried out by primary care nurses modifies the degree of frailty in people between 65 and 75 years of age.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Randomised, single-centre, open-label pilot study. The sample consisted of 24 patients of whom 12 were randomised to the intervention group (IG) and 12 to the control group (CG). Patients included in the IG received a nursing intervention for the management of frailty while the CG received a conventional nursing intervention not specific for the management of frailty. Both interventions were performed in a primary care clinic during a 12–15-week follow-up period. Validated lifestyle and frailty questionnaires were administered and biomedical and anthropometric data were recorded. Data were statistically treated as significant at <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final sample was 11 patients for the CG and 10 patients for the IG. The IG had significantly lower frailty at the end of follow-up compared to the CG (non-frail IG 80% vs. non-frail CG 18.1%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.0041). There were no differences in biomedical measurements, anthropometric data and in the questionnaires applied, however, the IG presented full compliance with physical exercise recommendations compared to the CG (100 vs. 27.3%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The nursing intervention for the management of frailty carried out in the IG reduces the number of patients with frailty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72917,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","volume":"36 5","pages":"Article 502507"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445147926000755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To analyse whether an intervention carried out by primary care nurses modifies the degree of frailty in people between 65 and 75 years of age.

Methods

Randomised, single-centre, open-label pilot study. The sample consisted of 24 patients of whom 12 were randomised to the intervention group (IG) and 12 to the control group (CG). Patients included in the IG received a nursing intervention for the management of frailty while the CG received a conventional nursing intervention not specific for the management of frailty. Both interventions were performed in a primary care clinic during a 12–15-week follow-up period. Validated lifestyle and frailty questionnaires were administered and biomedical and anthropometric data were recorded. Data were statistically treated as significant at P < .05.

Results

The final sample was 11 patients for the CG and 10 patients for the IG. The IG had significantly lower frailty at the end of follow-up compared to the CG (non-frail IG 80% vs. non-frail CG 18.1%, P = .0041). There were no differences in biomedical measurements, anthropometric data and in the questionnaires applied, however, the IG presented full compliance with physical exercise recommendations compared to the CG (100 vs. 27.3%, P = .002).

Conclusions

The nursing intervention for the management of frailty carried out in the IG reduces the number of patients with frailty.
护理干预对65-75岁初级保健人群虚弱的影响。试点临床试验。
目的:分析初级保健护士进行的干预是否能改变65 - 75岁人群的虚弱程度。方法:随机、单中心、开放标签先导研究。样本包括24例患者,其中12例随机分为干预组(IG), 12例随机分为对照组(CG)。纳入IG组的患者接受了虚弱管理的护理干预,而CG组接受了常规的护理干预,而不是专门针对虚弱管理的护理干预。在12-15周的随访期间,两种干预措施都在初级保健诊所进行。进行了有效的生活方式和虚弱问卷调查,并记录了生物医学和人体测量数据。结果:CG组最终样本11例,IG组最终样本10例。随访结束时,IG组的虚弱程度明显低于CG组(非虚弱IG组80% vs非虚弱CG组18.1%,P = 0.0041)。在生物医学测量、人体测量数据和应用的问卷上没有差异,但是,IG与CG相比完全遵守体育锻炼建议(100比27.3%,P = 0.002)。结论:在IG进行的虚弱管理护理干预,减少了虚弱患者的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书