Increasing demands on commissioning and quality assurance for cone-based multiple brain metastases robotic radiosurgery: evaluation in a custom phantom.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Godfrey Mukwada, Pejman Rowshanfarzad, Martin A Ebert
{"title":"Increasing demands on commissioning and quality assurance for cone-based multiple brain metastases robotic radiosurgery: evaluation in a custom phantom.","authors":"Godfrey Mukwada, Pejman Rowshanfarzad, Martin A Ebert","doi":"10.1007/s13246-026-01765-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of multiple brain metastases (MBM) using fixed cone collimation is well established. This study aims to rigorously evaluate the commissioning of MBM SRS using feasible complex clinical scenarios. Sixteen gross tumour volumes (GTVs) were contoured on the CT of an in-house developed phantom. Six treatment plans, testing different levels of complexity, were generated using the Ray Tracing (RT) dose calculation algorithm and recalculated with the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. Respective quality assurance (QA) plans were generated on the same phantom and delivered on a CyberKnife M6 system. QA was performed with EBT4 film inserted in the GTVs under investigation. The films were scanned and analysed using in-house developed software for comparison with RT and MC calculated dose distributions in the film planes. For simple cases, RT and MC performed equally well. As the number and proximity of GTVs increased, with complex GTV geometrical distribution and multiple prescription dose levels (MPDLs), the plan gamma pass rate at 3%/1 mm was 36.2% for RT compared to 96.4% for MC. Corresponding RT and MC calculated dose planes were also compared for the failing cases, and similar differences were observed. In conclusion, commissioning of the algorithm with simple and few brain metastases should not be assumed to hold for MBM SRS. The RT algorithm was found to be unsuitable for complex MBM SRS. When commissioning SRS techniques for treating multiple GTVs, the increased demands of proximity and geometrical distribution of GTVs, and the use of MPDLs, should be carefully considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1561-1569"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13638703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-026-01765-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of multiple brain metastases (MBM) using fixed cone collimation is well established. This study aims to rigorously evaluate the commissioning of MBM SRS using feasible complex clinical scenarios. Sixteen gross tumour volumes (GTVs) were contoured on the CT of an in-house developed phantom. Six treatment plans, testing different levels of complexity, were generated using the Ray Tracing (RT) dose calculation algorithm and recalculated with the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. Respective quality assurance (QA) plans were generated on the same phantom and delivered on a CyberKnife M6 system. QA was performed with EBT4 film inserted in the GTVs under investigation. The films were scanned and analysed using in-house developed software for comparison with RT and MC calculated dose distributions in the film planes. For simple cases, RT and MC performed equally well. As the number and proximity of GTVs increased, with complex GTV geometrical distribution and multiple prescription dose levels (MPDLs), the plan gamma pass rate at 3%/1 mm was 36.2% for RT compared to 96.4% for MC. Corresponding RT and MC calculated dose planes were also compared for the failing cases, and similar differences were observed. In conclusion, commissioning of the algorithm with simple and few brain metastases should not be assumed to hold for MBM SRS. The RT algorithm was found to be unsuitable for complex MBM SRS. When commissioning SRS techniques for treating multiple GTVs, the increased demands of proximity and geometrical distribution of GTVs, and the use of MPDLs, should be carefully considered.

基于椎体的多发性脑转移机器人放射手术的调试和质量保证需求不断增加:在定制幻影中的评估。
射波刀立体定向放射外科(SRS)治疗多发性脑转移瘤(MBM)使用固定锥准直是很好的建立。本研究旨在通过可行的复杂临床场景严格评估MBM SRS的调试。在CT上勾画了16个大体肿瘤体积(gtv)。使用射线追踪(RT)剂量计算算法生成6个治疗方案,测试不同的复杂程度,并使用蒙特卡罗(MC)算法重新计算。各自的质量保证(QA)计划在同一个幻影上生成,并在射波刀M6系统上交付。在被调查的gtv中插入EBT4薄膜进行QA。使用内部开发的软件对胶片进行扫描和分析,与RT和MC计算的胶片平面剂量分布进行比较。对于简单的病例,RT和MC表现同样好。随着GTV数量和距离的增加,GTV几何分布复杂,处方剂量水平(mpdl)多,放疗在3%/1 mm时的计划γ通过率为36.2%,而MC为96.4%。失败病例的相应RT和MC计算剂量面也进行了比较,发现相似的差异。综上所述,对于MBM SRS而言,不应假设该算法具有简单且较少的脑转移。发现RT算法不适用于复杂的MBM SRS。在调试SRS技术处理多个gtv时,应仔细考虑对gtv的接近性和几何分布的需求增加,以及mpdl的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书