The effectiveness of the Motion Room in the prevention of violent behavior and physical restraint in acute psychiatric inpatient units: a cross-sectional survey incorporating a pre-post design.
Enkeleda Gjini, Emanuela Prendi, Stefano Terzoni, Vittorio Oliverio, Alberto Bisesti, Margherita Lorusso, Federico Ruta, Armando D'Agostino, Paolo Ferrara
{"title":"The effectiveness of the Motion Room in the prevention of violent behavior and physical restraint in acute psychiatric inpatient units: a cross-sectional survey incorporating a pre-post design.","authors":"Enkeleda Gjini, Emanuela Prendi, Stefano Terzoni, Vittorio Oliverio, Alberto Bisesti, Margherita Lorusso, Federico Ruta, Armando D'Agostino, Paolo Ferrara","doi":"10.1708/4747.47643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Violent behaviours continue to be a significant problem worldwide. The introduction of Motion Rooms, particularly within acute psychiatric settings, can provide a safe and therapeutic intervention that, by promoting emotional self-regulation, reduces emotional distress and aggressive behaviors.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effects of a therapeutic intervention through the use of the Motion Room on the risk of violent behavior and the use of physical restraint.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A longitudinal design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the Motion Room in an acute psychiatric unit. The Italian version of the Broset Violence Checklist (BVC-ita) was used for the assessment of the risk of aggression before (T0) and 2 hours after intervention (T1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>102 patients were enrolled, 96 (94.12%) completed the intervention. The number of subjects at moderate/high risk decreased significantly at T1 (p=0.01). In the two hours following the intervention, one patient was subjected to physical restraint.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that sensory rooms can be a strong support for nursing staff in preventing aggressive behavior in an acute psychiatric ward. Further research with broader sampling and randomized studies is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21506,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di psichiatria","volume":"61 4","pages":"166-171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di psichiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1708/4747.47643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Violent behaviours continue to be a significant problem worldwide. The introduction of Motion Rooms, particularly within acute psychiatric settings, can provide a safe and therapeutic intervention that, by promoting emotional self-regulation, reduces emotional distress and aggressive behaviors.
Aim: To assess the effects of a therapeutic intervention through the use of the Motion Room on the risk of violent behavior and the use of physical restraint.
Materials and methods: A longitudinal design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the Motion Room in an acute psychiatric unit. The Italian version of the Broset Violence Checklist (BVC-ita) was used for the assessment of the risk of aggression before (T0) and 2 hours after intervention (T1).
Results: 102 patients were enrolled, 96 (94.12%) completed the intervention. The number of subjects at moderate/high risk decreased significantly at T1 (p=0.01). In the two hours following the intervention, one patient was subjected to physical restraint.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that sensory rooms can be a strong support for nursing staff in preventing aggressive behavior in an acute psychiatric ward. Further research with broader sampling and randomized studies is needed.
期刊介绍:
Gli interessi della rivista riguardano l’approfondimento delle interazioni tra mente e malattia, la validazione e la discussione dei nuovi strumenti e parametri di classificazione diagnostica, la verifica delle prospettive terapeutiche farmacologiche e non.