Clinical effectiveness of a digitally delivered balance program for older adults: a nonrandomized controlled trial.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Folasade Phillips, Sandhya Yadav, Cynthia Castro Sweet, Rachel Ns Foster Kirk, Mindy Hong, Samuel Mink, Jeffrey Krauss
{"title":"Clinical effectiveness of a digitally delivered balance program for older adults: a nonrandomized controlled trial.","authors":"Folasade Phillips, Sandhya Yadav, Cynthia Castro Sweet, Rachel Ns Foster Kirk, Mindy Hong, Samuel Mink, Jeffrey Krauss","doi":"10.57264/cer-2026-0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a digitally delivered balance program relative to an attention-control comparison group in older adults at risk for falls. <b>Materials & methods:</b> This nonrandomized controlled trial recruited adults aged 65 years and older with moderate-to-high fall risk. Participants were assigned to a digital balance program (exercise therapy, education and health coaching) or an attention-control group (education materials). Outcomes were assessed via self-report surveys at baseline and 3 months. Analyses including all assigned participants evaluated changes in fall rate, fall severity, physical function and medical care utilization. <b>Results:</b> A total of 687 participants were included in the analysis (intervention: n = 344; attention-control: n = 343). The mean age was 68.8 years, and 74.1% of participants were female. In the primary analysis, adjusting for baseline factors, the intervention group demonstrated a 37% lower fall rate compared with the attention-control group at 3 months (IRR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48-0.82, p < 0.001). The intervention group also demonstrated significant improvement in physical functioning (β = 6.86, 95% CI: 3.80-9.92, p < 0.001) and lower odds of emergency department visits (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.76, p = 0.004). Intervention participants engaged in an average of 25.2 exercise therapy sessions over the 12-week period. <b>Conclusion:</b> Findings suggest that participation in the digital balance program was associated with reductions in self-reported fall rates, improvements in self-reported physical function, and lower odds of emergency department utilization. High engagement levels further indicate that digitally delivered programs offer a viable option for improving health outcomes in this population. <b>Trial Registration:</b> Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06868680 retrospectively registered 6 March 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e260070"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2026-0070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a digitally delivered balance program relative to an attention-control comparison group in older adults at risk for falls. Materials & methods: This nonrandomized controlled trial recruited adults aged 65 years and older with moderate-to-high fall risk. Participants were assigned to a digital balance program (exercise therapy, education and health coaching) or an attention-control group (education materials). Outcomes were assessed via self-report surveys at baseline and 3 months. Analyses including all assigned participants evaluated changes in fall rate, fall severity, physical function and medical care utilization. Results: A total of 687 participants were included in the analysis (intervention: n = 344; attention-control: n = 343). The mean age was 68.8 years, and 74.1% of participants were female. In the primary analysis, adjusting for baseline factors, the intervention group demonstrated a 37% lower fall rate compared with the attention-control group at 3 months (IRR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48-0.82, p < 0.001). The intervention group also demonstrated significant improvement in physical functioning (β = 6.86, 95% CI: 3.80-9.92, p < 0.001) and lower odds of emergency department visits (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.76, p = 0.004). Intervention participants engaged in an average of 25.2 exercise therapy sessions over the 12-week period. Conclusion: Findings suggest that participation in the digital balance program was associated with reductions in self-reported fall rates, improvements in self-reported physical function, and lower odds of emergency department utilization. High engagement levels further indicate that digitally delivered programs offer a viable option for improving health outcomes in this population. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06868680 retrospectively registered 6 March 2025.

老年人数字化平衡项目的临床效果:一项非随机对照试验。
目的:评估数字传递平衡程序相对于注意力控制对照组在有跌倒风险的老年人中的临床有效性。材料与方法:这项非随机对照试验招募年龄在65岁及以上、有中高跌倒风险的成年人。参与者被分配到数字平衡项目(运动疗法、教育和健康指导)或注意力控制组(教育材料)。在基线和3个月时通过自我报告调查评估结果。包括所有指定参与者在内的分析评估了跌倒率、跌倒严重程度、身体功能和医疗保健利用的变化。结果:687名参与者被纳入分析(干预:n = 344;注意控制:n = 343)。平均年龄为68.8岁,74.1%为女性。在初步分析中,对基线因素进行调整后,干预组在3个月时的跌倒率比注意控制组低37% (IRR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48-0.82, p)。结论:研究结果表明,参与数字平衡计划与自我报告的跌倒率降低、自我报告的身体功能改善和急诊使用率降低有关。高参与度进一步表明,数字化交付方案为改善这一人群的健康状况提供了可行的选择。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06868680回顾性注册于2025年3月6日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of comparative effectiveness research
Journal of comparative effectiveness research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies. Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书