{"title":"Clinical effectiveness of a digitally delivered balance program for older adults: a nonrandomized controlled trial.","authors":"Folasade Phillips, Sandhya Yadav, Cynthia Castro Sweet, Rachel Ns Foster Kirk, Mindy Hong, Samuel Mink, Jeffrey Krauss","doi":"10.57264/cer-2026-0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a digitally delivered balance program relative to an attention-control comparison group in older adults at risk for falls. <b>Materials & methods:</b> This nonrandomized controlled trial recruited adults aged 65 years and older with moderate-to-high fall risk. Participants were assigned to a digital balance program (exercise therapy, education and health coaching) or an attention-control group (education materials). Outcomes were assessed via self-report surveys at baseline and 3 months. Analyses including all assigned participants evaluated changes in fall rate, fall severity, physical function and medical care utilization. <b>Results:</b> A total of 687 participants were included in the analysis (intervention: n = 344; attention-control: n = 343). The mean age was 68.8 years, and 74.1% of participants were female. In the primary analysis, adjusting for baseline factors, the intervention group demonstrated a 37% lower fall rate compared with the attention-control group at 3 months (IRR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48-0.82, p < 0.001). The intervention group also demonstrated significant improvement in physical functioning (β = 6.86, 95% CI: 3.80-9.92, p < 0.001) and lower odds of emergency department visits (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.76, p = 0.004). Intervention participants engaged in an average of 25.2 exercise therapy sessions over the 12-week period. <b>Conclusion:</b> Findings suggest that participation in the digital balance program was associated with reductions in self-reported fall rates, improvements in self-reported physical function, and lower odds of emergency department utilization. High engagement levels further indicate that digitally delivered programs offer a viable option for improving health outcomes in this population. <b>Trial Registration:</b> Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06868680 retrospectively registered 6 March 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e260070"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2026-0070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a digitally delivered balance program relative to an attention-control comparison group in older adults at risk for falls. Materials & methods: This nonrandomized controlled trial recruited adults aged 65 years and older with moderate-to-high fall risk. Participants were assigned to a digital balance program (exercise therapy, education and health coaching) or an attention-control group (education materials). Outcomes were assessed via self-report surveys at baseline and 3 months. Analyses including all assigned participants evaluated changes in fall rate, fall severity, physical function and medical care utilization. Results: A total of 687 participants were included in the analysis (intervention: n = 344; attention-control: n = 343). The mean age was 68.8 years, and 74.1% of participants were female. In the primary analysis, adjusting for baseline factors, the intervention group demonstrated a 37% lower fall rate compared with the attention-control group at 3 months (IRR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48-0.82, p < 0.001). The intervention group also demonstrated significant improvement in physical functioning (β = 6.86, 95% CI: 3.80-9.92, p < 0.001) and lower odds of emergency department visits (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.76, p = 0.004). Intervention participants engaged in an average of 25.2 exercise therapy sessions over the 12-week period. Conclusion: Findings suggest that participation in the digital balance program was associated with reductions in self-reported fall rates, improvements in self-reported physical function, and lower odds of emergency department utilization. High engagement levels further indicate that digitally delivered programs offer a viable option for improving health outcomes in this population. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06868680 retrospectively registered 6 March 2025.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies.
Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.