Can AI assist in reducing diagnostic error? A narrative review.

IF 1.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diagnosis Pub Date : 2026-07-22 DOI:10.1515/dx-2026-0021
Ian A Scott
{"title":"Can AI assist in reducing diagnostic error? A narrative review.","authors":"Ian A Scott","doi":"10.1515/dx-2026-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnostic error, defined as missed, wrong, or delayed diagnoses or those not communicated to patients, is common, affecting 5-10 % of hospital admissions and clinic visits. Such errors cause patient harm in up to 1 in 100 of such encounters and account for 10 % of all hospital deaths and serious adverse events. About 80 % of diagnostic errors are potentially preventable, most resulting from flaws in clinician reasoning in formulating and testing diagnostic hypotheses. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI), and large language models (LLMs) in particular, has attracted great interest in how these technologies can reduce diagnostic error within the context of bedside or clinic consultations. This narrative review aims to provide practising clinicians with a comprehensible analysis of where AI and LLMs are currently positioned in assisting diagnostic performance in clinician-patient encounters based on contemporary state-of-the-art research. It attempts to answer seven questions relevant to clinician understanding and adoption of AI/LLMs. It concludes that AI tools have matured to the extent that they can improve diagnostic decision-making of clinicians and can assist institutions in increasing diagnostic safety. The rapid development of LLMs and ongoing release of new versions necessitate continuous monitoring of their evolving diagnostic capabilities. Importantly, a balanced approach is required where LLMs work to complement, rather than replace, the nuanced diagnostic reasoning of clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2026-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnostic error, defined as missed, wrong, or delayed diagnoses or those not communicated to patients, is common, affecting 5-10 % of hospital admissions and clinic visits. Such errors cause patient harm in up to 1 in 100 of such encounters and account for 10 % of all hospital deaths and serious adverse events. About 80 % of diagnostic errors are potentially preventable, most resulting from flaws in clinician reasoning in formulating and testing diagnostic hypotheses. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI), and large language models (LLMs) in particular, has attracted great interest in how these technologies can reduce diagnostic error within the context of bedside or clinic consultations. This narrative review aims to provide practising clinicians with a comprehensible analysis of where AI and LLMs are currently positioned in assisting diagnostic performance in clinician-patient encounters based on contemporary state-of-the-art research. It attempts to answer seven questions relevant to clinician understanding and adoption of AI/LLMs. It concludes that AI tools have matured to the extent that they can improve diagnostic decision-making of clinicians and can assist institutions in increasing diagnostic safety. The rapid development of LLMs and ongoing release of new versions necessitate continuous monitoring of their evolving diagnostic capabilities. Importantly, a balanced approach is required where LLMs work to complement, rather than replace, the nuanced diagnostic reasoning of clinicians.

人工智能能帮助减少诊断错误吗?叙述性评论
诊断错误,定义为遗漏、错误或延迟诊断或未与患者沟通,是常见的,影响5- 10%的住院和门诊就诊。此类错误造成的患者伤害高达1 / 100,占所有医院死亡和严重不良事件的10% %。大约80% %的诊断错误是可以预防的,大多数是由于临床医生在制定和测试诊断假设时的推理缺陷造成的。人工智能(AI)的出现,特别是大型语言模型(llm)的出现,引起了人们对这些技术如何在床边或诊所咨询的背景下减少诊断错误的极大兴趣。这篇叙述性综述旨在为执业临床医生提供一个可理解的分析,即基于当代最先进的研究,人工智能和法学硕士目前在协助临床-患者接触中的诊断表现方面的定位。它试图回答与临床医生理解和采用人工智能/法学硕士相关的七个问题。它的结论是,人工智能工具已经成熟到可以改善临床医生的诊断决策,并可以帮助机构提高诊断安全性。llm的快速发展和新版本的不断发布需要对其不断发展的诊断能力进行持续监测。重要的是,法学硕士需要一种平衡的方法来补充而不是取代临床医生细致入微的诊断推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书