Recolonization and colonization resistance of the large bowel after three methods of preoperative preparation of the gastrointestinal tract for elective colorectal surgery.

A E van den Bogaard, W F Weidema, C P van Boven, D van der Waay
{"title":"Recolonization and colonization resistance of the large bowel after three methods of preoperative preparation of the gastrointestinal tract for elective colorectal surgery.","authors":"A E van den Bogaard,&nbsp;W F Weidema,&nbsp;C P van Boven,&nbsp;D van der Waay","doi":"10.1017/s0022172400064342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of three current types of preoperative large bowel preparation on the microbial flora and the colonization resistance (CR) was investigated in 15 volunteers. In the first group a whole gut irrigation was performed without administration of antibiotics (group WGI). In the second group 0.5 g/l metronidazole and 1 g/l neomycin was added to the irrigation fluid (group WGI + AB). A whole gut irrigation with prior oral administration of 1 l mannitol 10% was performed in the third group. The antibiotic prophylaxis in this group consisted of two doses of 80 mg gentamicin i.v. and 500 mg metronidazole orally 24 h after lavage (group Mann + AB). One hour after the mechanical cleansing procedure was finished all volunteers were orally contaminated with one dose of an Escherichia coli test strain. The aerobic faecal reduction due to the cleansing procedure was 2-3 logs, while for the anaerobes it was 4-5 logs. The anaerobic flora in group WGI recovered within 24 h, while the aerobes showed a transient 'overgrowth' for the period of 2 days. The overgrowth of aerobes in group WGI + AB was observed for more than a week and the total numbers of aerobes started gradually to decline after the anaerobic flora had reached pretreatment levels at day three or four. Despite the normal numbers of anaerobes present 24 h after treatment, overgrowth of E. coli was seen in the group Mann + AB, probably due to residual mannitol left in the intestinal tract. The test strain of E. coli was excreted for a period of 1 week by the volunteers in the groups WGI and Mann + AB, but it was isolated for more than 10 weeks in the group WGI + AB. It is thought that all three methods of preoperative large bowel preparation decreased the CR of the gastrointestinal tract because of a disturbance of the interaction between aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms and alterations of the colonic wall. The anaerobic microflora, however, appeared to be primarily responsible for the maintenance of the CR. Antimicrobial prophylaxis should consist of a high dose, short term, systemic antibiotic regimen, not only because an adequate serum level of an appropriate drug at the time of operation substantially decreases the incidence of postoperative septic complications but also because a systemic regimen scarcely influences the CR of the gastrointestinal tract. beta-Aspartylglycine appeared to be a specific but not very sensitive marker for decreased CR.</p>","PeriodicalId":15931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hygiene","volume":"97 1","pages":"49-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s0022172400064342","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022172400064342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

The impact of three current types of preoperative large bowel preparation on the microbial flora and the colonization resistance (CR) was investigated in 15 volunteers. In the first group a whole gut irrigation was performed without administration of antibiotics (group WGI). In the second group 0.5 g/l metronidazole and 1 g/l neomycin was added to the irrigation fluid (group WGI + AB). A whole gut irrigation with prior oral administration of 1 l mannitol 10% was performed in the third group. The antibiotic prophylaxis in this group consisted of two doses of 80 mg gentamicin i.v. and 500 mg metronidazole orally 24 h after lavage (group Mann + AB). One hour after the mechanical cleansing procedure was finished all volunteers were orally contaminated with one dose of an Escherichia coli test strain. The aerobic faecal reduction due to the cleansing procedure was 2-3 logs, while for the anaerobes it was 4-5 logs. The anaerobic flora in group WGI recovered within 24 h, while the aerobes showed a transient 'overgrowth' for the period of 2 days. The overgrowth of aerobes in group WGI + AB was observed for more than a week and the total numbers of aerobes started gradually to decline after the anaerobic flora had reached pretreatment levels at day three or four. Despite the normal numbers of anaerobes present 24 h after treatment, overgrowth of E. coli was seen in the group Mann + AB, probably due to residual mannitol left in the intestinal tract. The test strain of E. coli was excreted for a period of 1 week by the volunteers in the groups WGI and Mann + AB, but it was isolated for more than 10 weeks in the group WGI + AB. It is thought that all three methods of preoperative large bowel preparation decreased the CR of the gastrointestinal tract because of a disturbance of the interaction between aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms and alterations of the colonic wall. The anaerobic microflora, however, appeared to be primarily responsible for the maintenance of the CR. Antimicrobial prophylaxis should consist of a high dose, short term, systemic antibiotic regimen, not only because an adequate serum level of an appropriate drug at the time of operation substantially decreases the incidence of postoperative septic complications but also because a systemic regimen scarcely influences the CR of the gastrointestinal tract. beta-Aspartylglycine appeared to be a specific but not very sensitive marker for decreased CR.

择期结直肠手术前三种胃肠道准备方法对大肠再定植和定植抗性的影响。
研究了15名志愿者术前三种大肠准备方式对肠道微生物菌群及定植耐药性的影响。第一组在不给药的情况下全肠冲洗(WGI组)。第二组灌洗液中添加0.5 g/l甲硝唑和1 g/l新霉素(WGI + AB组)。第三组采用全肠冲洗,事先口服10%甘露醇1l。本组采用庆大霉素80mg静脉注射和甲硝唑500mg灌胃后24h口服两剂抗生素预防(Mann + AB组)。机械清洁程序完成一小时后,所有志愿者都口服了一剂大肠杆菌试验菌株。由于清洁过程,好氧粪便减少量为2-3 log,而厌氧粪便减少量为4-5 log。WGI组厌氧菌群在24 h内恢复,而需氧菌在2 d内出现短暂的“过度生长”。WGI + AB组需氧菌过度生长的现象持续了一个多星期,当厌氧菌群在第3天或第4天达到预处理水平后,需氧菌总数开始逐渐下降。尽管治疗24小时后厌氧菌数量正常,但在Mann + AB组中发现大肠杆菌过度生长,可能是由于肠道中残留的甘露醇。试验菌株在WGI组和Mann + AB组的志愿者中只排出了1周,而在WGI + AB组的志愿者中,大肠杆菌的分离时间超过了10周。据认为,这三种术前大肠准备方法都降低了胃肠道的CR,这是由于好氧和厌氧微生物之间的相互作用受到干扰以及结肠壁的改变。然而,厌氧菌群似乎是维持CR的主要原因。抗菌素预防应包括高剂量、短期、全身抗生素治疗方案,这不仅是因为手术时适当的血清药物水平可显著降低术后败血症并发症的发生率,而且还因为全身治疗方案几乎不影响胃肠道的CR。β -天冬氨酸似乎是降低CR的特异性但不是非常敏感的标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信