Traumatic Posterior Dislocation Is Associated with Posterior Acromial Morphology.

Jean-David Werthel,Alexander Vervaecke,Matteo Petit,Omid Jamei-Martel,Christian Gerber
{"title":"Traumatic Posterior Dislocation Is Associated with Posterior Acromial Morphology.","authors":"Jean-David Werthel,Alexander Vervaecke,Matteo Petit,Omid Jamei-Martel,Christian Gerber","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.26.00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nTraumatic posterior shoulder dislocation is rare, and the role of posterior acromial morphology in acute traumatic posterior dislocation is unknown. We compared posterior acromial morphology in first-time traumatic posterior versus first-time traumatic anterior dislocations.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn this retrospective comparative cohort study, 34 consecutive patients with a first-time acute traumatic posterior shoulder dislocation were compared with 34 consecutive patients with a first-time acute traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. The posterior dislocation cohort included 26 males and 8 females, with a mean age of 43.4 ± 16.5 years, and the anterior dislocation cohort included 29 males and 5 females, with a mean age of 41.3 ± 15.4 years. Posterior acromial tilt (PAT), posterior acromial coverage (PAC), posterior acromial height (PAH), and the critical shoulder angle (CSA) were measured on standardized radiographs. Comparisons between the groups were performed, and logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between acromial morphology parameters and posterior dislocation. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nCompared with the anterior dislocation group, patients with posterior dislocation demonstrated a significantly higher PAT (65.8° ± 6.7° versus 58.9° ± 8.4°, p < 0.001), lower PAC (55.6° ± 6.6° versus 59.5° ± 8.4°, p = 0.038), greater PAH (27.0 ± 4.2 versus 22.0 ± 6.7 mm, p < 0.001), and smaller CSA (32.9° ± 4.0° versus 35.5° ± 4.1°, p = 0.009). Logistic regression showed that higher PAH and PAT were most strongly associated with posterior dislocation. Measurement reliability was good to excellent for all parameters.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAcute traumatic posterior shoulder dislocation is associated with distinct posterior acromial morphology similar to that described in recurrent posterior instability.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nDiagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.26.00036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Traumatic posterior shoulder dislocation is rare, and the role of posterior acromial morphology in acute traumatic posterior dislocation is unknown. We compared posterior acromial morphology in first-time traumatic posterior versus first-time traumatic anterior dislocations. METHODS In this retrospective comparative cohort study, 34 consecutive patients with a first-time acute traumatic posterior shoulder dislocation were compared with 34 consecutive patients with a first-time acute traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. The posterior dislocation cohort included 26 males and 8 females, with a mean age of 43.4 ± 16.5 years, and the anterior dislocation cohort included 29 males and 5 females, with a mean age of 41.3 ± 15.4 years. Posterior acromial tilt (PAT), posterior acromial coverage (PAC), posterior acromial height (PAH), and the critical shoulder angle (CSA) were measured on standardized radiographs. Comparisons between the groups were performed, and logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between acromial morphology parameters and posterior dislocation. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS Compared with the anterior dislocation group, patients with posterior dislocation demonstrated a significantly higher PAT (65.8° ± 6.7° versus 58.9° ± 8.4°, p < 0.001), lower PAC (55.6° ± 6.6° versus 59.5° ± 8.4°, p = 0.038), greater PAH (27.0 ± 4.2 versus 22.0 ± 6.7 mm, p < 0.001), and smaller CSA (32.9° ± 4.0° versus 35.5° ± 4.1°, p = 0.009). Logistic regression showed that higher PAH and PAT were most strongly associated with posterior dislocation. Measurement reliability was good to excellent for all parameters. CONCLUSIONS Acute traumatic posterior shoulder dislocation is associated with distinct posterior acromial morphology similar to that described in recurrent posterior instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
外伤性后脱位与肩峰后形态有关。
背景:外伤性肩胛骨后脱位是罕见的,肩胛骨后形态在急性外伤性肩胛骨后脱位中的作用尚不清楚。我们比较了首次外伤性后脱位和首次外伤性前脱位的肩峰后形态。方法在这项回顾性比较队列研究中,将34例首次急性外伤性肩后脱位患者与34例首次急性外伤性肩前脱位患者进行比较。后路脱位组男性26例,女性8例,平均年龄43.4±16.5岁;前路脱位组男性29例,女性5例,平均年龄41.3±15.4岁。在标准化x线片上测量肩峰后倾斜(PAT)、肩峰后覆盖(PAC)、肩峰后高度(PAH)和临界肩角(CSA)。进行组间比较,并采用逻辑回归分析评估肩峰形态参数与后路脱位之间的关系。使用类内相关系数评估观察者间和观察者内的信度。结果与前脱位组相比,后路脱位患者的PAT(65.8°±6.7°比58.9°±8.4°,p < 0.001)、PAC(55.6°±6.6°比59.5°±8.4°,p = 0.038)、PAH(27.0±4.2比22.0±6.7 mm, p < 0.001)和CSA(32.9°±4.0°比35.5°±4.1°,p = 0.009)显著升高。Logistic回归分析显示,较高的PAH和PAT与后路脱位相关性最强。所有参数的测量信度均为良好至优秀。结论急性外伤性肩后脱位与复发性后路不稳的肩峰后形态相似。证据级别诊断级IV。参见《作者说明》获得证据级别的完整描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书