Efficacy and safety of a novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of freckles in Chinese patients: a randomized, split-face, multicenter, noninferiority trial.

IF 3.9
Yuxi Zhou, Yingqiu Bao, Yu Fu
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of a novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of freckles in Chinese patients: a randomized, split-face, multicenter, noninferiority trial.","authors":"Yuxi Zhou, Yingqiu Bao, Yu Fu","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2026.2702775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The picosecond Nd:YAG laser is a standard treatment for freckles. However, factors such as cost and technology barriers may limit accessibility, necessitating evaluation of alternative systems.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the noninferiority and safety of a novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser versus an established system for treating freckles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-face trial, 84 participants received a single treatment session. Contralateral facial sides were randomly assigned to the investigational or control device in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the response rate at week 8. Secondary endpoints included the cure rate, investigator-assessed improvement, patient satisfaction and procedural tolerability. Safety was assessed by adverse events monitoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The investigational device demonstrated noninferiority to the control (response rates: 97.6% vs. 97.6%; difference, 0.0%; 95% confidence interval: -3.30% to 3.30%) with comparable cure rates (13.1% vs. 9.5%, <i>p</i> = .527). Participant satisfaction was significantly higher with the investigational device (72.6% vs. 58.3%, <i>p</i> = .001). Treatment duration suggested an association with superior efficacy (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.14-3.76, <i>p</i> = .016). No serious adverse effects occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser is noninferior to the established system, with comparable short-term efficacy and safety. Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"37 1","pages":"2702775"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2026.2702775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The picosecond Nd:YAG laser is a standard treatment for freckles. However, factors such as cost and technology barriers may limit accessibility, necessitating evaluation of alternative systems.

Objectives: To evaluate the noninferiority and safety of a novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser versus an established system for treating freckles.

Methods: In this randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-face trial, 84 participants received a single treatment session. Contralateral facial sides were randomly assigned to the investigational or control device in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the response rate at week 8. Secondary endpoints included the cure rate, investigator-assessed improvement, patient satisfaction and procedural tolerability. Safety was assessed by adverse events monitoring.

Results: The investigational device demonstrated noninferiority to the control (response rates: 97.6% vs. 97.6%; difference, 0.0%; 95% confidence interval: -3.30% to 3.30%) with comparable cure rates (13.1% vs. 9.5%, p = .527). Participant satisfaction was significantly higher with the investigational device (72.6% vs. 58.3%, p = .001). Treatment duration suggested an association with superior efficacy (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.14-3.76, p = .016). No serious adverse effects occurred.

Conclusion: The novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser is noninferior to the established system, with comparable short-term efficacy and safety. Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety.

新型532nm皮秒Nd:YAG激光治疗中国患者雀斑的疗效和安全性:一项随机、裂面、多中心、非劣效性试验
背景:皮秒Nd:YAG激光是治疗雀斑的标准方法。然而,诸如成本和技术障碍等因素可能限制可及性,因此有必要对替代系统进行评估。目的:评价新型532nm皮秒Nd:YAG激光与现有系统治疗雀斑的非劣效性和安全性。方法:在这项随机、评估者盲法、裂面试验中,84名参与者接受了一次治疗。对侧面部按1:1的比例随机分配到研究装置或对照装置。主要终点是第8周的缓解率。次要终点包括治愈率、研究者评估的改善、患者满意度和手术耐受性。通过不良事件监测评估安全性。结果:研究装置与对照组相比具有非劣效性(有效率:97.6% vs. 97.6%;差异为0.0%;95%置信区间:-3.30% ~ 3.30%),治愈率相当(13.1% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.527)。参与者对研究装置的满意度显著提高(72.6%比58.3%,p = .001)。治疗时间与较好的疗效相关(OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.14-3.76, p = 0.016)。未发生严重不良反应。结论:新型532 nm皮秒Nd:YAG激光与已建立的系统相比,具有相当的短期疗效和安全性。需要进一步的研究来评估长期安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书