Efficacy and safety of a novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of freckles in Chinese patients: a randomized, split-face, multicenter, noninferiority trial.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of a novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of freckles in Chinese patients: a randomized, split-face, multicenter, noninferiority trial.","authors":"Yuxi Zhou, Yingqiu Bao, Yu Fu","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2026.2702775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The picosecond Nd:YAG laser is a standard treatment for freckles. However, factors such as cost and technology barriers may limit accessibility, necessitating evaluation of alternative systems.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the noninferiority and safety of a novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser versus an established system for treating freckles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-face trial, 84 participants received a single treatment session. Contralateral facial sides were randomly assigned to the investigational or control device in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the response rate at week 8. Secondary endpoints included the cure rate, investigator-assessed improvement, patient satisfaction and procedural tolerability. Safety was assessed by adverse events monitoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The investigational device demonstrated noninferiority to the control (response rates: 97.6% vs. 97.6%; difference, 0.0%; 95% confidence interval: -3.30% to 3.30%) with comparable cure rates (13.1% vs. 9.5%, <i>p</i> = .527). Participant satisfaction was significantly higher with the investigational device (72.6% vs. 58.3%, <i>p</i> = .001). Treatment duration suggested an association with superior efficacy (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.14-3.76, <i>p</i> = .016). No serious adverse effects occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser is noninferior to the established system, with comparable short-term efficacy and safety. Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"37 1","pages":"2702775"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2026.2702775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The picosecond Nd:YAG laser is a standard treatment for freckles. However, factors such as cost and technology barriers may limit accessibility, necessitating evaluation of alternative systems.
Objectives: To evaluate the noninferiority and safety of a novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser versus an established system for treating freckles.
Methods: In this randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-face trial, 84 participants received a single treatment session. Contralateral facial sides were randomly assigned to the investigational or control device in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the response rate at week 8. Secondary endpoints included the cure rate, investigator-assessed improvement, patient satisfaction and procedural tolerability. Safety was assessed by adverse events monitoring.
Results: The investigational device demonstrated noninferiority to the control (response rates: 97.6% vs. 97.6%; difference, 0.0%; 95% confidence interval: -3.30% to 3.30%) with comparable cure rates (13.1% vs. 9.5%, p = .527). Participant satisfaction was significantly higher with the investigational device (72.6% vs. 58.3%, p = .001). Treatment duration suggested an association with superior efficacy (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.14-3.76, p = .016). No serious adverse effects occurred.
Conclusion: The novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser is noninferior to the established system, with comparable short-term efficacy and safety. Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety.