Iván Manuel De la Vega Hernández;Giulio Marchena Sekli;Kelly Santander
{"title":"Scientific Mapping and Systematic Literature Review on Sociotechnical Change and Transition to Industry 5.0 or Society 5.0","authors":"Iván Manuel De la Vega Hernández;Giulio Marchena Sekli;Kelly Santander","doi":"10.1109/EMR.2025.3618554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to explore two of the main currents of thought on the evolution of humanity, derived from the great transformations driven by technological change. The purpose is to recognize the characteristics, similarities, and differences of the Industry 5.0 (I5.0) and Society 5.0 (S5.0) models and to propose scenarios with distinctive features to determine which of them will prevail in the future. The approach of the study is deductive; the strategy is exploratory; and the method applied is mixed. The quantitative method was developed through a longitudinal scientific mapping performed in Web of Science and Scopus databases. The qualitative method was carried out through an exhaustive review of the literature using terminology connected to the topics explored. This mapping made it possible to identify the countries, institutions, scientific collaboration networks, and leading authors in these fields of knowledge. The results revealed convergent and divergent attributes between the two approaches. There is a set of technologies that will predictably prevail, regardless of the model adopted. However, key differences in the approaches and in the dynamics of human–technology interaction were also identified. It is assumed that both models are complementary in the use of technologies, but their fundamental difference lies in the approach. I5.0 focuses on the sphere of high-end manufacturing, with an emphasis on enhancing human creativity and labor welfare through technological integration, while S5.0 prioritizes a broad social spectrum and integrates various aspects of life where there is an intelligent audit of the use of technology.","PeriodicalId":35585,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Engineering Management Review","volume":"54 2","pages":"79-104"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Engineering Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11195130/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore two of the main currents of thought on the evolution of humanity, derived from the great transformations driven by technological change. The purpose is to recognize the characteristics, similarities, and differences of the Industry 5.0 (I5.0) and Society 5.0 (S5.0) models and to propose scenarios with distinctive features to determine which of them will prevail in the future. The approach of the study is deductive; the strategy is exploratory; and the method applied is mixed. The quantitative method was developed through a longitudinal scientific mapping performed in Web of Science and Scopus databases. The qualitative method was carried out through an exhaustive review of the literature using terminology connected to the topics explored. This mapping made it possible to identify the countries, institutions, scientific collaboration networks, and leading authors in these fields of knowledge. The results revealed convergent and divergent attributes between the two approaches. There is a set of technologies that will predictably prevail, regardless of the model adopted. However, key differences in the approaches and in the dynamics of human–technology interaction were also identified. It is assumed that both models are complementary in the use of technologies, but their fundamental difference lies in the approach. I5.0 focuses on the sphere of high-end manufacturing, with an emphasis on enhancing human creativity and labor welfare through technological integration, while S5.0 prioritizes a broad social spectrum and integrates various aspects of life where there is an intelligent audit of the use of technology.
本研究的目的是探索人类进化的两种主要思潮,它们源于技术变革所推动的巨大变革。目的是识别工业5.0 (I5.0)和社会5.0 (S5.0)模型的特征、相似点和不同点,并提出具有鲜明特征的场景,以确定哪一个将在未来占上风。研究的方法是演绎法;战略是探索性的;所采用的方法是混合的。定量方法是通过在Web of Science和Scopus数据库中进行纵向科学映射来开发的。定性方法是通过使用与所探讨主题相关的术语对文献进行详尽的审查而进行的。通过绘制地图,可以确定这些知识领域的国家、机构、科学合作网络和主要作者。结果显示了两种方法的收敛性和发散性。无论采用何种模式,总有一组技术可以预见会占上风。然而,在方法和人-技术互动的动态方面的关键差异也被确定。假设这两种模型在技术的使用上是互补的,但它们的根本区别在于方法。I5.0专注于高端制造领域,强调通过技术整合提高人类创造力和劳动福利,而S5.0优先考虑广泛的社会范围,整合生活的各个方面,对技术的使用进行智能审核。
期刊介绍:
Reprints articles from other publications of significant interest to members. The papers are aimed at those engaged in managing research, development, or engineering activities. Reprints make it possible for the readers to receive the best of today"s literature without having to subscribe to and read other periodicals.