Survey on Federated Unlearning: Challenges and Opportunities

IF 8.1 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
IEEE Transactions on Big Data Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-27 DOI:10.1109/TBDATA.2026.3668538
Hyejun Jeong;Shiqing Ma;Amir Houmansadr
{"title":"Survey on Federated Unlearning: Challenges and Opportunities","authors":"Hyejun Jeong;Shiqing Ma;Amir Houmansadr","doi":"10.1109/TBDATA.2026.3668538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Federated learning (FL), introduced in 2017, enables collaborative learning across mutually distrusting parties without sharing raw data, enabling privacy-preserving model training. However, emerging regulations and practical demands require models to be able to <italic>forget</i> learned data, leading to growing interest in Machine Unlearning (MU). In the context of FL, many techniques developed for unlearning in centralized settings are not trivially applicable. This is due to interactivity, stochasticity, heterogeneity, and limited data accessibility. This has motivated a distinct research area of <italic>federated unlearning</i> (FU). This survey provides the first <italic>practice-oriented synthesis</i> of FU, foregrounding aspects often overlooked in prior surveys: data-distribution modeling (and non-IID simulation), dataset selection, and FL system configurations. We introduce a taxonomy that separates influence removal from performance recovery, and compare FU approaches across unlearning targets, aggregation assumptions, and reproducibility signals. By analyzing datasets, evaluation metrics, and code availability, we surface key trends that differentiate FU from centralized MU. We highlight challenges unique to FU, such as interactive training, stochastic client participation, and data isolation, and synthesize open problems around scalability, fairness, and unlearning in foundation models. Our survey aims to guide FU research by clarifying methodological gaps, system assumptions, and promising directions.","PeriodicalId":13106,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Big Data","volume":"12 3","pages":"702-720"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Big Data","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11415662/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Federated learning (FL), introduced in 2017, enables collaborative learning across mutually distrusting parties without sharing raw data, enabling privacy-preserving model training. However, emerging regulations and practical demands require models to be able to forget learned data, leading to growing interest in Machine Unlearning (MU). In the context of FL, many techniques developed for unlearning in centralized settings are not trivially applicable. This is due to interactivity, stochasticity, heterogeneity, and limited data accessibility. This has motivated a distinct research area of federated unlearning (FU). This survey provides the first practice-oriented synthesis of FU, foregrounding aspects often overlooked in prior surveys: data-distribution modeling (and non-IID simulation), dataset selection, and FL system configurations. We introduce a taxonomy that separates influence removal from performance recovery, and compare FU approaches across unlearning targets, aggregation assumptions, and reproducibility signals. By analyzing datasets, evaluation metrics, and code availability, we surface key trends that differentiate FU from centralized MU. We highlight challenges unique to FU, such as interactive training, stochastic client participation, and data isolation, and synthesize open problems around scalability, fairness, and unlearning in foundation models. Our survey aims to guide FU research by clarifying methodological gaps, system assumptions, and promising directions.
联邦遗忘调查:挑战与机遇
联邦学习(FL)于2017年推出,可以在互不信任的各方之间进行协作学习,而无需共享原始数据,从而实现保护隐私的模型训练。然而,新出现的法规和实际需求要求模型能够忘记学习过的数据,从而导致人们对机器学习(MU)的兴趣日益浓厚。在FL的背景下,许多为在集中设置中忘记而开发的技术并不简单适用。这是由于交互性、随机性、异质性和有限的数据可访问性。这激发了联合遗忘(FU)这一独特的研究领域。这项调查提供了第一个以实践为导向的FU综合,在以前的调查中经常被忽视的前景方面:数据分布建模(和非iid模拟),数据集选择和FL系统配置。我们引入了一种分类法,将影响消除与性能恢复分开,并在学习目标、聚合假设和可重复性信号中比较FU方法。通过分析数据集、评估指标和代码可用性,我们揭示了区分FU和集中式MU的关键趋势。我们强调了FU特有的挑战,如交互式训练、随机客户参与和数据隔离,并综合了基础模型中围绕可扩展性、公平性和遗忘的开放性问题。我们的调查旨在通过澄清方法上的差距、系统假设和有前途的方向来指导FU研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Big Data publishes peer-reviewed articles focusing on big data. These articles present innovative research ideas and application results across disciplines, including novel theories, algorithms, and applications. Research areas cover a wide range, such as big data analytics, visualization, curation, management, semantics, infrastructure, standards, performance analysis, intelligence extraction, scientific discovery, security, privacy, and legal issues specific to big data. The journal also prioritizes applications of big data in fields generating massive datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书