TrustChain: A Blockchain Framework for Auditing and Verifying Aggregators in Decentralized Federated Learning

IF 8.1 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
IEEE Transactions on Big Data Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI:10.1109/TBDATA.2025.3639977
Ehsan Hallaji;Roozbeh Razavi-Far;Mehrdad Saif
{"title":"TrustChain: A Blockchain Framework for Auditing and Verifying Aggregators in Decentralized Federated Learning","authors":"Ehsan Hallaji;Roozbeh Razavi-Far;Mehrdad Saif","doi":"10.1109/TBDATA.2025.3639977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The serverless nature of Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) requires allocating the aggregation role to specific participants in each federated round. Current DFL architectures ensure the trustworthiness of the aggregator node upon selection. However, most of these studies overlook the possibility that the aggregating node may turn rogue and act maliciously after being nominated. To address this problem, this paper proposes a DFL structure, called <monospace>TrustChain</monospace>, that scores the aggregators before selection based on their past behavior and additionally audits them after the aggregation. To do this, the statistical independence between the client updates and the aggregated model is continuously monitored using the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC). The proposed method relies on several principles, including blockchain, anomaly detection, and concept drift analysis. The designed structure is evaluated on several federated datasets and attack scenarios with different numbers of Byzantine nodes.","PeriodicalId":13106,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Big Data","volume":"12 3","pages":"741-751"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Big Data","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11278062/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The serverless nature of Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) requires allocating the aggregation role to specific participants in each federated round. Current DFL architectures ensure the trustworthiness of the aggregator node upon selection. However, most of these studies overlook the possibility that the aggregating node may turn rogue and act maliciously after being nominated. To address this problem, this paper proposes a DFL structure, called TrustChain, that scores the aggregators before selection based on their past behavior and additionally audits them after the aggregation. To do this, the statistical independence between the client updates and the aggregated model is continuously monitored using the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC). The proposed method relies on several principles, including blockchain, anomaly detection, and concept drift analysis. The designed structure is evaluated on several federated datasets and attack scenarios with different numbers of Byzantine nodes.
TrustChain:分布式联邦学习中审计和验证聚合器的区块链框架
分散式联邦学习(DFL)的无服务器特性要求将聚合角色分配给每个联邦轮中的特定参与者。当前的DFL架构确保了聚合器节点在选择时的可信性。然而,这些研究大多忽略了聚合节点在被提名后可能变得流氓和恶意行为的可能性。为了解决这个问题,本文提出了一个DFL结构,称为TrustChain,它在选择之前根据聚合器过去的行为对它们进行评分,并在聚合之后对它们进行额外的审计。为此,使用Hilbert-Schmidt独立性标准(HSIC)持续监视客户机更新和聚合模型之间的统计独立性。所提出的方法依赖于几种原理,包括区块链、异常检测和概念漂移分析。设计的结构在多个联邦数据集和具有不同拜占庭节点数量的攻击场景下进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Big Data publishes peer-reviewed articles focusing on big data. These articles present innovative research ideas and application results across disciplines, including novel theories, algorithms, and applications. Research areas cover a wide range, such as big data analytics, visualization, curation, management, semantics, infrastructure, standards, performance analysis, intelligence extraction, scientific discovery, security, privacy, and legal issues specific to big data. The journal also prioritizes applications of big data in fields generating massive datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书