Optimal Coordination of Practically Constrained Demand Response Program and Distribution Network Reconfiguration

IF 2.8 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Tharmini Thavaratnam;Bala Venkatesh
{"title":"Optimal Coordination of Practically Constrained Demand Response Program and Distribution Network Reconfiguration","authors":"Tharmini Thavaratnam;Bala Venkatesh","doi":"10.1109/OAJPE.2026.3711804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electric utilities and regulators are preparing for an electrified future with greater reliance on green energy. Building to peak demand is typical practice but becomes prohibitively expensive under deep electrification. Regulators are therefore contemplating methods to improve system utilization by reducing peak demand using flexibility tools such as demand response (DR) and distribution network reconfiguration (DNR). Practical DR programs for commercial and industrial users limit monthly activation frequency and duration, with higher costs beyond those limits. DNR causes additional wear on breakers and incurs costs. However, literature and utilities rarely address coordinated scheduling of DR and DNR, without coordination, DR may be used prematurely or sub optimally reducing long-term efficiency. The proposed framework co-optimizes DR activations and DNR switching decisions over a month-long horizon, using forecasted daily peak demand to minimize operational costs while respecting operational constraints, enabling a trend reversal in cumulative operational cost trajectories. Contribution 1 develops a DR model reflecting realistic utility constraints and consumer behavior. Contribution 2 formulates inter-temporal coordination of DR and DNR in a monthly mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) model. Studies on 12-Bus, IEEE 33-Bus and IEEE 69-Bus networks demonstrate that the co-optimization approach outperforms sequential daily optimizations, reducing operational costs by 47.56%, 29.77%, and 32.23% respectively, highlighting its effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":56187,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy","volume":"13 ","pages":"570-582"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11602073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11602073/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electric utilities and regulators are preparing for an electrified future with greater reliance on green energy. Building to peak demand is typical practice but becomes prohibitively expensive under deep electrification. Regulators are therefore contemplating methods to improve system utilization by reducing peak demand using flexibility tools such as demand response (DR) and distribution network reconfiguration (DNR). Practical DR programs for commercial and industrial users limit monthly activation frequency and duration, with higher costs beyond those limits. DNR causes additional wear on breakers and incurs costs. However, literature and utilities rarely address coordinated scheduling of DR and DNR, without coordination, DR may be used prematurely or sub optimally reducing long-term efficiency. The proposed framework co-optimizes DR activations and DNR switching decisions over a month-long horizon, using forecasted daily peak demand to minimize operational costs while respecting operational constraints, enabling a trend reversal in cumulative operational cost trajectories. Contribution 1 develops a DR model reflecting realistic utility constraints and consumer behavior. Contribution 2 formulates inter-temporal coordination of DR and DNR in a monthly mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) model. Studies on 12-Bus, IEEE 33-Bus and IEEE 69-Bus networks demonstrate that the co-optimization approach outperforms sequential daily optimizations, reducing operational costs by 47.56%, 29.77%, and 32.23% respectively, highlighting its effectiveness.
实际约束需求响应方案与配电网重构的最优协调
电力公司和监管机构正在为更加依赖绿色能源的电气化未来做准备。针对峰值需求进行建设是一种典型做法,但在深度电气化的情况下,成本变得过高。因此,监管机构正在考虑通过使用需求响应(DR)和配电网络重构(DNR)等灵活性工具减少峰值需求来提高系统利用率的方法。商业和工业用户的实际DR程序限制每月激活频率和持续时间,超出这些限制的成本更高。DNR会对断路器造成额外的磨损并产生成本。然而,文献和实用程序很少涉及DR和DNR的协调调度,如果没有协调,DR可能会过早或次优地使用,降低长期效率。提出的框架在一个月的时间跨度内共同优化DR激活和DNR切换决策,利用预测的每日峰值需求来最大限度地降低运营成本,同时尊重运营约束,实现累积运营成本轨迹的趋势逆转。贡献1建立了一个反映现实效用约束和消费者行为的DR模型。贡献2在一个月混合整数非线性规划(MINLP)模型中描述了DR和DNR的跨时间协调。对12-Bus、IEEE 33-Bus和IEEE 69-Bus网络的研究表明,协同优化方法优于顺序日常优化,分别降低了47.56%、29.77%和32.23%的运营成本,突出了其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
45
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书