A Co-Simulation Framework for Steady-State Analyses of Multiple Droop-Based MTdc Grids in Continental-Scale Systems

IF 2.8 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Quan Nguyen;Sameer Nekkalapu;Tony Nguyen;Bharat Vyakaranam;Michael Abdelmalak;Hisham Mahmood;Chuan Qin;Nader Samaan
{"title":"A Co-Simulation Framework for Steady-State Analyses of Multiple Droop-Based MTdc Grids in Continental-Scale Systems","authors":"Quan Nguyen;Sameer Nekkalapu;Tony Nguyen;Bharat Vyakaranam;Michael Abdelmalak;Hisham Mahmood;Chuan Qin;Nader Samaan","doi":"10.1109/OAJPE.2026.3711062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing scale and complexity of planning continental hybrid ac and multi-terminal dc (MTdc) systems require scalable steady-state modeling and analysis approaches not currently available in commercial tools. In particular, widely used planning and commercial power-flow environments typically offer limited support for multiple meshed MTdc grids, and do not natively represent droop-based control and converter current-limiting strategies in a manner that scales to continental studies. As a result, planners often rely on simplified representations that obscure key ac–dc coupling effects. This paper presents a comprehensive multi-fidelity model-conversion framework that enables the efficient transition of MTdc grid models from production cost modeling (PCM) and approximated ac power flow to detailed ac–MTdc power flow for large-scale planning studies. The core of this framework is a scalable co-simulation approach that, for the first time, enables power flow analysis in continental-scale ac–MTdc systems. It seamlessly couples commercial ac solvers with a detailed MTdc grid model that incorporates droop-based control and current-limiting strategies of multiple meshed MTdc grids. Leveraging this capability, an evaluation framework to systematically assess and compare different MTdc power redispatch strategies under ac and dc contingencies is introduced. The proposed framework and algorithm are evaluated using both a combined IEEE 39-bus system with a 3-terminal MTdc grid and a large-scale system integrating the Western and Eastern Interconnections with 11 MTdc grids of varying sizes. The results demonstrate a coherent transition from PCM to detailed ac–MTdc power flow analysis, robust power flow convergence under diverse operating conditions, and enhanced system performance in voltage regulation and transmission line overload mitigation following representative contingencies.","PeriodicalId":56187,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy","volume":"13 ","pages":"553-569"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11598802","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11598802/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing scale and complexity of planning continental hybrid ac and multi-terminal dc (MTdc) systems require scalable steady-state modeling and analysis approaches not currently available in commercial tools. In particular, widely used planning and commercial power-flow environments typically offer limited support for multiple meshed MTdc grids, and do not natively represent droop-based control and converter current-limiting strategies in a manner that scales to continental studies. As a result, planners often rely on simplified representations that obscure key ac–dc coupling effects. This paper presents a comprehensive multi-fidelity model-conversion framework that enables the efficient transition of MTdc grid models from production cost modeling (PCM) and approximated ac power flow to detailed ac–MTdc power flow for large-scale planning studies. The core of this framework is a scalable co-simulation approach that, for the first time, enables power flow analysis in continental-scale ac–MTdc systems. It seamlessly couples commercial ac solvers with a detailed MTdc grid model that incorporates droop-based control and current-limiting strategies of multiple meshed MTdc grids. Leveraging this capability, an evaluation framework to systematically assess and compare different MTdc power redispatch strategies under ac and dc contingencies is introduced. The proposed framework and algorithm are evaluated using both a combined IEEE 39-bus system with a 3-terminal MTdc grid and a large-scale system integrating the Western and Eastern Interconnections with 11 MTdc grids of varying sizes. The results demonstrate a coherent transition from PCM to detailed ac–MTdc power flow analysis, robust power flow convergence under diverse operating conditions, and enhanced system performance in voltage regulation and transmission line overload mitigation following representative contingencies.
大陆尺度系统多下垂MTdc网格稳态分析的联合仿真框架
规划大陆混合交流和多终端直流(MTdc)系统的规模和复杂性不断增长,需要可扩展的稳态建模和分析方法,而这些方法目前在商业工具中是不可用的。特别是,广泛使用的规划和商业潮流环境通常对多网格MTdc电网提供有限的支持,并且不能以扩展到大陆研究的方式原生地表示基于下降的控制和转换器电流限制策略。因此,规划者通常依赖于模糊关键交直流耦合效应的简化表示。本文提出了一个全面的多保真度模型转换框架,使MTdc电网模型能够有效地从生产成本建模(PCM)和近似的交流潮流过渡到详细的交流- MTdc潮流,用于大规模规划研究。该框架的核心是一种可扩展的联合模拟方法,该方法首次实现了大陆级交流- mtdc系统的潮流分析。它将商业交流求解器与详细的MTdc网格模型无缝耦合,该模型结合了基于下垂的控制和多个网格MTdc网格的限流策略。利用这种能力,介绍了一个评估框架,系统地评估和比较交流和直流事故下不同的MTdc功率再分配策略。本文对所提出的框架和算法进行了评估,使用了一个具有3端MTdc电网的IEEE 39总线组合系统和一个包含11个不同大小MTdc电网的大型系统。结果表明,从PCM到详细的交流- mtdc潮流分析的连贯过渡,在不同运行条件下的强大潮流收敛,以及在代表性突发事件后的电压调节和输电线路过载缓解方面增强的系统性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
45
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书