Predicting Situation Awareness From Physiological Signals

IF 4.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Kieran J. Smith;Tristan C. Endsley;Torin K. Clark
{"title":"Predicting Situation Awareness From Physiological Signals","authors":"Kieran J. Smith;Tristan C. Endsley;Torin K. Clark","doi":"10.1109/THMS.2025.3647796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Situation awareness (SA)—comprising the ability to 1) perceive critical elements in the environment, 2) comprehend their meanings, and 3) project their future states—is critical for human operator performance. Due to the disruptive nature of gold-standard SA measures, researchers have sought physiological indicators to provide real-time information about SA. We extend prior work by using a multimodal suite of neurophysiological, psychophysiological, and behavioral signals, predicting all three levels of SA along a continuum, and predicting a comprehensive measure of SA in a complex multitasking simulation. We present a lab study in which 31 participants controlled an aircraft simulator task battery while wearing physiological sensors and responding to SA “freeze-probe” assessments. We demonstrate the validity of task and assessment for measuring SA. Multimodal physiological models predict SA with greater predictive performance (<italic>Q</i><sup>2</sup> for levels 1–3 and total, respectively: 0.14, 0.00, 0.26, and 0.36) than models built with shuffled labels, demonstrating that multimodal physiological signals provide useful, albeit imperfect, information in predicting all SA levels. Level 3 SA (projection) was best predicted, and level 2 SA (comprehension) was the most challenging to predict. Ablation analysis and single-sensor models found EEG and eye-tracking signals to be particularly useful to predictions of level 3 and total SA. A reduced sensor fusion model showed that predictive performance can be maintained with a subset of sensors. This rigorous cross-validation assessment of predictive performance demonstrates the utility of multimodal physiological signals for inferring complex, holistic, objective measures of SA at all levels, nondisruptively, and along a continuum.","PeriodicalId":48916,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems","volume":"56 2","pages":"213-223"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11413951/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Situation awareness (SA)—comprising the ability to 1) perceive critical elements in the environment, 2) comprehend their meanings, and 3) project their future states—is critical for human operator performance. Due to the disruptive nature of gold-standard SA measures, researchers have sought physiological indicators to provide real-time information about SA. We extend prior work by using a multimodal suite of neurophysiological, psychophysiological, and behavioral signals, predicting all three levels of SA along a continuum, and predicting a comprehensive measure of SA in a complex multitasking simulation. We present a lab study in which 31 participants controlled an aircraft simulator task battery while wearing physiological sensors and responding to SA “freeze-probe” assessments. We demonstrate the validity of task and assessment for measuring SA. Multimodal physiological models predict SA with greater predictive performance (Q2 for levels 1–3 and total, respectively: 0.14, 0.00, 0.26, and 0.36) than models built with shuffled labels, demonstrating that multimodal physiological signals provide useful, albeit imperfect, information in predicting all SA levels. Level 3 SA (projection) was best predicted, and level 2 SA (comprehension) was the most challenging to predict. Ablation analysis and single-sensor models found EEG and eye-tracking signals to be particularly useful to predictions of level 3 and total SA. A reduced sensor fusion model showed that predictive performance can be maintained with a subset of sensors. This rigorous cross-validation assessment of predictive performance demonstrates the utility of multimodal physiological signals for inferring complex, holistic, objective measures of SA at all levels, nondisruptively, and along a continuum.
从生理信号预测态势感知
态势感知(SA)——包括1)感知环境中的关键要素,2)理解其含义,以及3)预测其未来状态的能力——对人类操作员的表现至关重要。由于金标准SA测量的破坏性,研究人员寻求生理指标来提供SA的实时信息。我们通过使用神经生理、心理生理和行为信号的多模态组合来扩展先前的工作,沿着连续体预测所有三个水平的SA,并在复杂的多任务模拟中预测SA的综合测量。我们提出了一项实验室研究,其中31名参与者在佩戴生理传感器并响应SA“冻结探针”评估的同时控制飞机模拟器任务电池。我们论证了任务和评估的有效性。多模态生理模型预测SA的预测性能(Q2分别为1-3和总水平:0.14,0.00,0.26和0.36)比使用混乱标签构建的模型更好,这表明多模态生理信号在预测所有SA水平方面提供了有用的信息,尽管不完美。3级SA(投射)预测效果最好,2级SA(理解)最难预测。消融分析和单传感器模型发现脑电图和眼动追踪信号对预测3级和总SA特别有用。一个简化的传感器融合模型表明,该模型可以在一个传感器子集中保持预测性能。这种对预测性能的严格交叉验证评估证明了多模态生理信号在推断复杂的、全面的、客观的、非破坏性的、连续的水平SA测量中的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
期刊介绍: The scope of the IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems includes the fields of human machine systems. It covers human systems and human organizational interactions including cognitive ergonomics, system test and evaluation, and human information processing concerns in systems and organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书