Thai nursing students' experiences of stress, role positioning, and facilitation tone in simulation-based learning: implications for culturally responsive facilitation and debriefing.
{"title":"Thai nursing students' experiences of stress, role positioning, and facilitation tone in simulation-based learning: implications for culturally responsive facilitation and debriefing.","authors":"Trakulwong Luecha, Charunyakorn Viriya, Nattaya Sangsai, Patcharin Poonthawe, Witchaporn Kidsamrong, Warisa Kanbuala, Puntaree Pikulnee, Paweena Tivasiripong","doi":"10.1186/s41077-026-00472-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation facilitation models have developed predominantly in Western educational settings. The ways in which cultural norms, particularly kreng-jai and deference to authority, shape nursing student participation in high power-distance contexts have received limited empirical attention.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined how stress, role positioning, and facilitator feedback timing and tone interact to shape participation and culturally safe learning in simulation-based nursing education in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Thai with 24 third- and fourth-year nursing students in Eastern Thailand between August and October 2024. Interviews lasted 45-60 min and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were developed. Entering a New Space positioned simulation as a threshold where visibility intersected with kreng-jai-patterned restraint; students' reluctance to speak was culturally rational rather than disengagement. Stress as a Double-Edged Sword in Simulation showed that pressure could sharpen recall and prioritisation but could also narrow participation when abrupt feedback arrived mid-scenario. Learning Across Participation, Observation, and Debriefing identified distinct but complementary learning routes: active scenario participants acted under time pressure, whereas observers developed an analytic perspective, with both perspectives converging during debriefing. Facilitation and Cultural Safety found that calm guidance kept kreng-jai compatible with engagement, whereas abrupt correction rendered silence a response to relational risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participation and psychological safety in simulation were not inherent features of instructional design but were interactionally and culturally mediated through facilitation, role positioning, and hierarchical norms.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13670541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-026-00472-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Simulation facilitation models have developed predominantly in Western educational settings. The ways in which cultural norms, particularly kreng-jai and deference to authority, shape nursing student participation in high power-distance contexts have received limited empirical attention.
Objectives: This study examined how stress, role positioning, and facilitator feedback timing and tone interact to shape participation and culturally safe learning in simulation-based nursing education in Thailand.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Thai with 24 third- and fourth-year nursing students in Eastern Thailand between August and October 2024. Interviews lasted 45-60 min and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results: Four themes were developed. Entering a New Space positioned simulation as a threshold where visibility intersected with kreng-jai-patterned restraint; students' reluctance to speak was culturally rational rather than disengagement. Stress as a Double-Edged Sword in Simulation showed that pressure could sharpen recall and prioritisation but could also narrow participation when abrupt feedback arrived mid-scenario. Learning Across Participation, Observation, and Debriefing identified distinct but complementary learning routes: active scenario participants acted under time pressure, whereas observers developed an analytic perspective, with both perspectives converging during debriefing. Facilitation and Cultural Safety found that calm guidance kept kreng-jai compatible with engagement, whereas abrupt correction rendered silence a response to relational risk.
Conclusion: Participation and psychological safety in simulation were not inherent features of instructional design but were interactionally and culturally mediated through facilitation, role positioning, and hierarchical norms.