Thai nursing students' experiences of stress, role positioning, and facilitation tone in simulation-based learning: implications for culturally responsive facilitation and debriefing.

IF 3.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Trakulwong Luecha, Charunyakorn Viriya, Nattaya Sangsai, Patcharin Poonthawe, Witchaporn Kidsamrong, Warisa Kanbuala, Puntaree Pikulnee, Paweena Tivasiripong
{"title":"Thai nursing students' experiences of stress, role positioning, and facilitation tone in simulation-based learning: implications for culturally responsive facilitation and debriefing.","authors":"Trakulwong Luecha, Charunyakorn Viriya, Nattaya Sangsai, Patcharin Poonthawe, Witchaporn Kidsamrong, Warisa Kanbuala, Puntaree Pikulnee, Paweena Tivasiripong","doi":"10.1186/s41077-026-00472-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation facilitation models have developed predominantly in Western educational settings. The ways in which cultural norms, particularly kreng-jai and deference to authority, shape nursing student participation in high power-distance contexts have received limited empirical attention.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined how stress, role positioning, and facilitator feedback timing and tone interact to shape participation and culturally safe learning in simulation-based nursing education in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Thai with 24 third- and fourth-year nursing students in Eastern Thailand between August and October 2024. Interviews lasted 45-60 min and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were developed. Entering a New Space positioned simulation as a threshold where visibility intersected with kreng-jai-patterned restraint; students' reluctance to speak was culturally rational rather than disengagement. Stress as a Double-Edged Sword in Simulation showed that pressure could sharpen recall and prioritisation but could also narrow participation when abrupt feedback arrived mid-scenario. Learning Across Participation, Observation, and Debriefing identified distinct but complementary learning routes: active scenario participants acted under time pressure, whereas observers developed an analytic perspective, with both perspectives converging during debriefing. Facilitation and Cultural Safety found that calm guidance kept kreng-jai compatible with engagement, whereas abrupt correction rendered silence a response to relational risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participation and psychological safety in simulation were not inherent features of instructional design but were interactionally and culturally mediated through facilitation, role positioning, and hierarchical norms.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13670541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-026-00472-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simulation facilitation models have developed predominantly in Western educational settings. The ways in which cultural norms, particularly kreng-jai and deference to authority, shape nursing student participation in high power-distance contexts have received limited empirical attention.

Objectives: This study examined how stress, role positioning, and facilitator feedback timing and tone interact to shape participation and culturally safe learning in simulation-based nursing education in Thailand.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Thai with 24 third- and fourth-year nursing students in Eastern Thailand between August and October 2024. Interviews lasted 45-60 min and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Four themes were developed. Entering a New Space positioned simulation as a threshold where visibility intersected with kreng-jai-patterned restraint; students' reluctance to speak was culturally rational rather than disengagement. Stress as a Double-Edged Sword in Simulation showed that pressure could sharpen recall and prioritisation but could also narrow participation when abrupt feedback arrived mid-scenario. Learning Across Participation, Observation, and Debriefing identified distinct but complementary learning routes: active scenario participants acted under time pressure, whereas observers developed an analytic perspective, with both perspectives converging during debriefing. Facilitation and Cultural Safety found that calm guidance kept kreng-jai compatible with engagement, whereas abrupt correction rendered silence a response to relational risk.

Conclusion: Participation and psychological safety in simulation were not inherent features of instructional design but were interactionally and culturally mediated through facilitation, role positioning, and hierarchical norms.

泰国护理学生在模拟学习中的压力、角色定位和促进基调:对文化响应性促进和汇报的影响。
背景:模拟促进模型主要是在西方教育环境中发展起来的。文化规范,尤其是敬教和对权威的尊重,在高权力距离环境中塑造护理学生参与的方式受到了有限的实证关注。目的:本研究考察了泰国基于模拟的护理教育中,压力、角色定位、引导者反馈时间和语气如何相互作用,以塑造参与和文化安全学习。方法:于2024年8月至10月在泰国东部对24名三年级和四年级护理专业学生进行半结构化访谈。访谈持续45-60分钟,使用反身性主题分析进行分析。结果:发展了四个主题。《进入新空间》将模拟定位为一个门槛,在这里可见性与宫拳模式的约束相交;学生们不愿发言是出于文化上的理性,而非脱离。模拟中的压力是一把双刃剑,表明压力可以增强回忆和优先级,但当突然的反馈在场景中期到来时,压力也可能缩小参与范围。通过参与、观察和汇报学习确定了不同但互补的学习路径:积极情景参与者在时间压力下行动,而观察者则形成了分析视角,两种视角在汇报过程中融合。促进和文化安全研究发现,冷静的指导使“指教”与参与保持一致,而突然的纠正则使沉默成为对关系风险的反应。结论:模拟中的参与和心理安全不是教学设计的固有特征,而是通过促进、角色定位和等级规范进行互动和文化中介的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书