Enhancing virtual screening of cystathionine β-synthase inhibitors: benchmarking target-specific machine-learning scoring functions against state-of-the-art AI docking and co-folding approaches

IF 7.9 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Cheminformatics Pub Date : 2026-07-18 Epub Date: 2026-10-15 DOI:10.1186/s13321-026-01262-x
Cao-Minh Truong, Van-Thinh To, Nathalie Janel, Julien Dairou, Pedro J. Ballester, Olivier Taboureau, Viet-Khoa Tran-Nguyen
{"title":"Enhancing virtual screening of cystathionine β-synthase inhibitors: benchmarking target-specific machine-learning scoring functions against state-of-the-art AI docking and co-folding approaches","authors":"Cao-Minh Truong,&nbsp;Van-Thinh To,&nbsp;Nathalie Janel,&nbsp;Julien Dairou,&nbsp;Pedro J. Ballester,&nbsp;Olivier Taboureau,&nbsp;Viet-Khoa Tran-Nguyen","doi":"10.1186/s13321-026-01262-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) has emerged as an important therapeutic target implicated in cancer and Down syndrome, yet the discovery of selective CBS inhibitors remains challenging due to limited structural diversity of known ligands and the scarcity of target-focused virtual screening (VS) benchmarks. In this study, we present the first comprehensive evaluation of CBS-specific artificial intelligence (AI) models for structure-based VS, supported by a carefully curated and up-to-date data set of experimentally validated CBS inhibitors, true inactives and decoys. Using this data set, we developed CBS-specific binary classification models trained on docking-derived features and evaluated them in a rigorous five-fold cross-validation framework that employed similarity-controlled splits, ensuring structural independence between training and test sets while minimizing intra-fold class bias. Predictive performance was assessed primarily using the normalized enrichment factor of true actives at 1% (NEF1%) alongside balanced accuracy. Across all folds, the CBS-specific AI models demonstrated consistently high screening power and robust classification performance. Importantly, we benchmarked their performance against a diverse panel of 16 established VS pipelines, including widely adopted docking-based scoring schemes, modern deep-learning (DL) docking tools, and recent co-folding approaches for protein–ligand binding prediction. The CBS-specific AI classifiers substantially outperformed these state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods in early enrichment (NEF1% = 0.764 ± 0.191), highlighting the advantage of target-focused training for VS tasks. Our results further reveal that generic DL docking and co-folding approaches struggle to achieve reliable screening performance when applied to targets under-represented in or entirely absent from their training data, as appears to be the case for CBS. This finding underscores a key limitation of broadly trained foundation-style models in prospective drug discovery campaigns involving less-studied proteins. Overall, this work reinforces the benefits of target-specific AI scoring models tailored to individual proteins, highlights the value of high-quality curated data sets for such efforts, and provides practical guidance for selecting VS strategies in case of data-limited targets. To promote transparency and reproducibility, all input and output files, curated data sets and source code are freely available via GitHub and Zenodo.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cheminformatics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13321-026-01262-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cheminformatics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13321-026-01262-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) has emerged as an important therapeutic target implicated in cancer and Down syndrome, yet the discovery of selective CBS inhibitors remains challenging due to limited structural diversity of known ligands and the scarcity of target-focused virtual screening (VS) benchmarks. In this study, we present the first comprehensive evaluation of CBS-specific artificial intelligence (AI) models for structure-based VS, supported by a carefully curated and up-to-date data set of experimentally validated CBS inhibitors, true inactives and decoys. Using this data set, we developed CBS-specific binary classification models trained on docking-derived features and evaluated them in a rigorous five-fold cross-validation framework that employed similarity-controlled splits, ensuring structural independence between training and test sets while minimizing intra-fold class bias. Predictive performance was assessed primarily using the normalized enrichment factor of true actives at 1% (NEF1%) alongside balanced accuracy. Across all folds, the CBS-specific AI models demonstrated consistently high screening power and robust classification performance. Importantly, we benchmarked their performance against a diverse panel of 16 established VS pipelines, including widely adopted docking-based scoring schemes, modern deep-learning (DL) docking tools, and recent co-folding approaches for protein–ligand binding prediction. The CBS-specific AI classifiers substantially outperformed these state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods in early enrichment (NEF1% = 0.764 ± 0.191), highlighting the advantage of target-focused training for VS tasks. Our results further reveal that generic DL docking and co-folding approaches struggle to achieve reliable screening performance when applied to targets under-represented in or entirely absent from their training data, as appears to be the case for CBS. This finding underscores a key limitation of broadly trained foundation-style models in prospective drug discovery campaigns involving less-studied proteins. Overall, this work reinforces the benefits of target-specific AI scoring models tailored to individual proteins, highlights the value of high-quality curated data sets for such efforts, and provides practical guidance for selecting VS strategies in case of data-limited targets. To promote transparency and reproducibility, all input and output files, curated data sets and source code are freely available via GitHub and Zenodo.

增强半胱硫氨酸β合酶抑制剂的虚拟筛选:针对最先进的人工智能对接和共折叠方法对目标特异性机器学习评分功能进行基准测试。
胱氨酸β合酶(CBS)已成为癌症和唐氏综合征的重要治疗靶点,但由于已知配体的结构多样性有限,以及缺乏以靶标为中心的虚拟筛选(VS)基准,选择性CBS抑制剂的发现仍然具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们首次对基于结构的VS的CBS特异性人工智能(AI)模型进行了全面评估,并通过精心策划和最新的实验验证的CBS抑制剂,真正的失活和诱饵数据集进行了支持。利用该数据集,我们开发了基于对接衍生特征训练的cbs特定二元分类模型,并在采用相似性控制分割的严格五重交叉验证框架中对其进行评估,确保了训练集和测试集之间的结构独立性,同时最大限度地减少了折叠内类偏差。预测性能主要使用1%真活性的归一化富集因子(NEF1%)和平衡精度进行评估。在所有折叠中,cbs特定的人工智能模型都表现出一贯的高筛选能力和稳健的分类性能。重要的是,我们将它们的性能与16个已建立的VS管道的不同面板进行了基准测试,包括广泛采用的基于对接的评分方案,现代深度学习(DL)对接工具,以及最近用于蛋白质配体结合预测的共折叠方法。cbs特定的AI分类器在早期富集方面明显优于这些最先进的(SOTA)方法(NEF1% = 0.764±0.191),突出了以目标为中心的VS任务训练的优势。我们的研究结果进一步表明,当应用于训练数据中代表性不足或完全不存在的目标时,通用DL对接和共折叠方法难以实现可靠的筛选性能,CBS的情况似乎就是如此。这一发现强调了在涉及研究较少的蛋白质的前瞻性药物发现活动中广泛训练的基础式模型的关键局限性。总的来说,这项工作加强了针对单个蛋白质定制的目标特定AI评分模型的好处,突出了高质量策划数据集的价值,并为在数据有限的目标情况下选择VS策略提供了实用指导。为了提高透明度和可重复性,所有的输入和输出文件,精心策划的数据集和源代码都可以通过GitHub和Zenodo免费获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cheminformatics
Journal of Cheminformatics CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Cheminformatics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all aspects of cheminformatics and molecular modelling. Coverage includes, but is not limited to: chemical information systems, software and databases, and molecular modelling, chemical structure representations and their use in structure, substructure, and similarity searching of chemical substance and chemical reaction databases, computer and molecular graphics, computer-aided molecular design, expert systems, QSAR, and data mining techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书