Systematic gravity-induced posterior tumour drift in free-breathing lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Lars Merring-Mikkelsen, Hella M.B. Sand, Mads H. Brincker
{"title":"Systematic gravity-induced posterior tumour drift in free-breathing lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy","authors":"Lars Merring-Mikkelsen,&nbsp;Hella M.B. Sand,&nbsp;Mads H. Brincker","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2026.101030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Intra-fractional respiratory tumour motion is a known challenge in lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), as it can compromise target dose coverage. Gravity-induced tumour baseline drift during free-breathing carries the same risk but remains uncharacterised. This study aimed to quantify posterior tumour drift in peripheral lung SABR, investigate predictive factors, and evaluate tumour dose coverage.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In total, 97 patients (102 tumours) treated with 67.5 Gy in 3 fractions were analysed. Pre- and post-treatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging quantified intra-fractional shifts at the first and second fraction. Temporal linear regression determined patient-specific drift rates. Correlations between drift rates and patient and tumour parameters were assessed. Plans were recalculated for worst-case drifts exceeding the 4 mm posterior planning target volume (PTV) margin.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Systematic posterior drift was observed, with mean vertical shifts of −1.45 mm at the first fraction and − 1.24 mm at the second fraction (both <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Mean lateral and longitudinal shifts were negligible. No correlations with patient or tumour characteristics were identified. Based on drift rates, 15.7% of patients would exceed the 4 mm posterior margin within a 20-min treatment. Recalculated plans revealed severe gross tumour volume (GTV) underdosage: mean D<sub>90%</sub> coverage decreased from 99.9% to 74.2% (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) under worst-case scenarios.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Gravity-induced posterior drift represents a systematic, clinically significant phenomenon in free-breathing lung SABR. In 15.7% of patients, drifts exceeded planning margins, with potentially severe target underdosage. Routine post-treatment CBCT verification is recommended to identify at-risk patients, enabling intervention at subsequent fractions to ensure treatment accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 101030"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631626001302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Intra-fractional respiratory tumour motion is a known challenge in lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), as it can compromise target dose coverage. Gravity-induced tumour baseline drift during free-breathing carries the same risk but remains uncharacterised. This study aimed to quantify posterior tumour drift in peripheral lung SABR, investigate predictive factors, and evaluate tumour dose coverage.

Materials and methods

In total, 97 patients (102 tumours) treated with 67.5 Gy in 3 fractions were analysed. Pre- and post-treatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging quantified intra-fractional shifts at the first and second fraction. Temporal linear regression determined patient-specific drift rates. Correlations between drift rates and patient and tumour parameters were assessed. Plans were recalculated for worst-case drifts exceeding the 4 mm posterior planning target volume (PTV) margin.

Results

Systematic posterior drift was observed, with mean vertical shifts of −1.45 mm at the first fraction and − 1.24 mm at the second fraction (both p < 0.001). Mean lateral and longitudinal shifts were negligible. No correlations with patient or tumour characteristics were identified. Based on drift rates, 15.7% of patients would exceed the 4 mm posterior margin within a 20-min treatment. Recalculated plans revealed severe gross tumour volume (GTV) underdosage: mean D90% coverage decreased from 99.9% to 74.2% (p < 0.001) under worst-case scenarios.

Conclusions

Gravity-induced posterior drift represents a systematic, clinically significant phenomenon in free-breathing lung SABR. In 15.7% of patients, drifts exceeded planning margins, with potentially severe target underdosage. Routine post-treatment CBCT verification is recommended to identify at-risk patients, enabling intervention at subsequent fractions to ensure treatment accuracy.
自由呼吸肺立体定向消融放疗中系统重力诱导的后侧肿瘤漂移
背景和目的在肺立体定向消融放疗(SABR)中,分数阶呼吸道肿瘤运动是一个已知的挑战,因为它会损害靶剂量覆盖。在自由呼吸期间,重力诱导的肿瘤基线漂移具有相同的风险,但仍然没有特征。本研究旨在量化外周肺SABR的后部肿瘤漂移,探讨预测因素,并评估肿瘤剂量覆盖。材料与方法对3组67.5 Gy治疗的97例(102例)肿瘤进行分析。治疗前和治疗后的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)成像量化了第一和第二分数的分数内移位。时间线性回归确定了患者特异性漂移率。评估漂移率与患者和肿瘤参数之间的相关性。对于最坏情况下超过4毫米后规划目标体积(PTV)边际的漂移,重新计算计划。结果观察到系统的后验漂移,第一部分的平均垂直位移为- 1.45 mm,第二部分为- 1.24 mm (p < 0.001)。平均横向和纵向位移可以忽略不计。与患者或肿瘤特征无相关性。根据漂移率,15.7%的患者在治疗20分钟内超过4毫米后缘。重新计算的计划显示了严重的总肿瘤体积(GTV)剂量不足:在最坏情况下,平均D90%覆盖率从99.9%下降到74.2% (p < 0.001)。结论在自由呼吸肺SABR中,重力诱导的后漂移是一种系统的、有临床意义的现象。在15.7%的患者中,漂移超过了计划范围,可能出现严重的靶剂量不足。建议进行常规治疗后CBCT验证,以识别高危患者,并在后续阶段进行干预,以确保治疗的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书