AI-SOFA: An EMR-integrated Nursing Informatics-driven Decision Support System for Mortality Risk-informed ICU Clinical Decision-making.

IF 1.9
Su-Jin Jeong, Shin-Jeong Kim
{"title":"AI-SOFA: An EMR-integrated Nursing Informatics-driven Decision Support System for Mortality Risk-informed ICU Clinical Decision-making.","authors":"Su-Jin Jeong, Shin-Jeong Kim","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate and timely mortality prediction is essential for nursing clinical decision-making in intensive care units (ICUs). Although the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is widely used to evaluate organ dysfunction, its manual calculation limits routine application in fast-paced clinical environments. This study aimed to enhance ICU system-level safety and workflow efficiency by refining and evaluating an automated Electronic Medical Record (EMR)-integrated SOFA scoring system (AI-SOFA) to evaluate: (1) its predictive performance for mortality compared to traditional manual scoring; and (2) its clinical utility as a nursing informatics initiative. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using EMR data from 2559 ICU admissions at a tertiary hospital in South Korea. Automated SOFA scores were generated using 11 routinely collected clinical parameters. Logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost models were trained, and model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 score. ICU mortality increased markedly with higher SOFA scores, exceeding 50% at scores ≥13. Among the machine learning (ML) models, XGBoost demonstrated the highest predictive performance (AUROC=0.9005), outperforming random forest (0.8975) and logistic regression (0.8722). In contrast, mortality prediction based on manual SOFA scoring showed substantially lower accuracy (AUROC=0.64). The AI-SOFA system serves as a nursing informatics tool that supports nursing workflows by enabling real-time risk stratification, reducing documentation burden, and facilitating timely clinical decision-making in ICU settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520598,"journal":{"name":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate and timely mortality prediction is essential for nursing clinical decision-making in intensive care units (ICUs). Although the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is widely used to evaluate organ dysfunction, its manual calculation limits routine application in fast-paced clinical environments. This study aimed to enhance ICU system-level safety and workflow efficiency by refining and evaluating an automated Electronic Medical Record (EMR)-integrated SOFA scoring system (AI-SOFA) to evaluate: (1) its predictive performance for mortality compared to traditional manual scoring; and (2) its clinical utility as a nursing informatics initiative. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using EMR data from 2559 ICU admissions at a tertiary hospital in South Korea. Automated SOFA scores were generated using 11 routinely collected clinical parameters. Logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost models were trained, and model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 score. ICU mortality increased markedly with higher SOFA scores, exceeding 50% at scores ≥13. Among the machine learning (ML) models, XGBoost demonstrated the highest predictive performance (AUROC=0.9005), outperforming random forest (0.8975) and logistic regression (0.8722). In contrast, mortality prediction based on manual SOFA scoring showed substantially lower accuracy (AUROC=0.64). The AI-SOFA system serves as a nursing informatics tool that supports nursing workflows by enabling real-time risk stratification, reducing documentation burden, and facilitating timely clinical decision-making in ICU settings.

AI-SOFA: emr综合护理信息学驱动的ICU临床死亡率风险决策支持系统。
准确、及时的死亡率预测对重症监护病房(icu)护理临床决策至关重要。虽然顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分被广泛用于评估器官功能障碍,但其人工计算限制了在快节奏临床环境中的常规应用。本研究旨在通过改进和评估自动化电子病历(EMR)集成SOFA评分系统(AI-SOFA)来提高ICU系统级安全性和工作流程效率,以评估:(1)与传统人工评分相比,其对死亡率的预测性能;(2)其作为护理信息学倡议的临床应用。回顾性队列研究使用韩国一家三级医院2559名ICU住院患者的电子病历数据。使用11个常规收集的临床参数生成自动SOFA评分。对Logistic回归、随机森林和XGBoost模型进行训练,并使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、灵敏度、特异性、准确性和F1评分来评估模型的性能。SOFA评分越高,ICU死亡率显著升高,评分≥13时死亡率超过50%。在机器学习(ML)模型中,XGBoost表现出最高的预测性能(AUROC=0.9005),优于随机森林(0.8975)和逻辑回归(0.8722)。相比之下,基于人工SOFA评分的死亡率预测准确率明显较低(AUROC=0.64)。AI-SOFA系统作为一种护理信息学工具,通过实现实时风险分层、减轻文件负担和促进ICU环境中的及时临床决策,支持护理工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书