Parent-administered Metered-dose Inhalers Improves Medication Administration Time in the Children's Emergency.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2026-07-16 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000889
Nur Nasiha B M Bahrudin, Cherie Tan, Germaine R Eu, Qian Wen Sng
{"title":"Parent-administered Metered-dose Inhalers Improves Medication Administration Time in the Children's Emergency.","authors":"Nur Nasiha B M Bahrudin, Cherie Tan, Germaine R Eu, Qian Wen Sng","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prompt administration of bronchodilator therapy via metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) is critical to optimizing clinical outcomes in children with bronchospasm. At our children's emergency department, baseline data indicated that the average interval between the first and second MDI bronchodilator cycles was 44.4 minutes, highlighting delays in bronchodilator therapy. The primary objective was to achieve a 30% reduction in the time interval between the first and second bronchodilator MDI cycles within 1 year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multidisciplinary quality improvement project was conducted using the Plan-Do-Study-Act model. Children aged 4-13 years presenting with clinical symptoms requiring bronchodilator therapy via MDI (salbutamol ± ipratropium) were included. Key interventions included revising the workflow to allow nurse-supervised parent administration of MDI, supported by information leaflets, educational videos, nurse-led demonstrations, competency checks, and a designated space for MDI administration. Our primary outcome measure was the time taken to administer the second cycle. Secondary outcome measures focused on parental competency and parent and nurse satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From August 2022 to June 2023, our educational program reduced the mean time to administer the second MDI cycle from 44.3 (SD 31.3) to 27.6 (SD 8.1) minutes (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Ninety-eight percent of parents were competent on their first attempt. Both parents and nurses reported high satisfaction with the initiative and perceived it as safe.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parent-administered MDI significantly reduced the time interval between the first and second cycles and was highly accepted by parents and nurses, demonstrating an effective, sustainable approach to reducing delays in MDI administration in the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":"11 4","pages":"e889"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13375059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prompt administration of bronchodilator therapy via metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) is critical to optimizing clinical outcomes in children with bronchospasm. At our children's emergency department, baseline data indicated that the average interval between the first and second MDI bronchodilator cycles was 44.4 minutes, highlighting delays in bronchodilator therapy. The primary objective was to achieve a 30% reduction in the time interval between the first and second bronchodilator MDI cycles within 1 year.

Methods: This multidisciplinary quality improvement project was conducted using the Plan-Do-Study-Act model. Children aged 4-13 years presenting with clinical symptoms requiring bronchodilator therapy via MDI (salbutamol ± ipratropium) were included. Key interventions included revising the workflow to allow nurse-supervised parent administration of MDI, supported by information leaflets, educational videos, nurse-led demonstrations, competency checks, and a designated space for MDI administration. Our primary outcome measure was the time taken to administer the second cycle. Secondary outcome measures focused on parental competency and parent and nurse satisfaction.

Results: From August 2022 to June 2023, our educational program reduced the mean time to administer the second MDI cycle from 44.3 (SD 31.3) to 27.6 (SD 8.1) minutes (P < 0.001). Ninety-eight percent of parents were competent on their first attempt. Both parents and nurses reported high satisfaction with the initiative and perceived it as safe.

Conclusions: Parent-administered MDI significantly reduced the time interval between the first and second cycles and was highly accepted by parents and nurses, demonstrating an effective, sustainable approach to reducing delays in MDI administration in the emergency department.

家长管理的计量吸入器缩短了儿童紧急情况下的用药时间。
通过计量吸入器(MDIs)及时给予支气管扩张剂治疗对于优化支气管痉挛患儿的临床结果至关重要。在我们的儿童急诊科,基线数据表明,第一次和第二次MDI支气管扩张剂周期之间的平均间隔为44.4分钟,这突出了支气管扩张剂治疗的延迟。主要目标是在1年内将第一次和第二次支气管扩张剂MDI周期之间的时间间隔减少30%。方法:本多学科质量改进项目采用计划-执行-研究-行动模式进行。年龄4-13岁的儿童出现临床症状,需要通过MDI(沙丁胺醇±异丙托品)进行支气管扩张剂治疗。主要干预措施包括修改工作流程,允许护士监督家长管理MDI,并辅以信息传单、教育视频、护士主导的示范、能力检查和指定的MDI管理空间。我们的主要结局指标是进行第二周期治疗所需的时间。次要结果测量侧重于父母能力和父母和护士满意度。结果:从2022年8月到2023年6月,我们的教育计划将实施第二个MDI周期的平均时间从44.3分钟(SD 31.3)减少到27.6分钟(SD 8.1)分钟(P < 0.001)。98%的父母在第一次尝试时就能胜任。家长和护士都对这一举措表示高度满意,并认为它是安全的。结论:家长给药的MDI显著缩短了第一和第二周期之间的时间间隔,得到了家长和护士的高度接受,证明了一种有效、可持续的方法来减少急诊部门MDI给药的延误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书