Continuous Aerosolized Albuterol Treatment for Status Asthmaticus on the General Care Floor: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2026-07-16 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000896
Kailey A Remien, Charles Hardy, Karen Allen, Matthew Wysong, Morgan Zlotolow, Gerd McGwire, Courtney Whitacre, Renae Forsythe, Tara Dinh, Lisa Ulrich, Adjoa A Andoh, Samantha W Gee, Shauna Schord
{"title":"Continuous Aerosolized Albuterol Treatment for Status Asthmaticus on the General Care Floor: A Quality Improvement Initiative.","authors":"Kailey A Remien, Charles Hardy, Karen Allen, Matthew Wysong, Morgan Zlotolow, Gerd McGwire, Courtney Whitacre, Renae Forsythe, Tara Dinh, Lisa Ulrich, Adjoa A Andoh, Samantha W Gee, Shauna Schord","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Asthma, a leading cause of pediatric hospitalization, affects more than 6 million US children and costs more than $5 billion annually. Continuous aerosolized albuterol (CAA) effectively treats severe exacerbations but is typically reserved for intensive care or emergency settings. This quality improvement project aimed to safely expand CAA use on the general care floor (GCF) by monitoring treatment uptake, protocol adherence, and safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center quality improvement project, led by a multidisciplinary team, included children aged 2-18 years with status asthmaticus on CAA who met the inclusion criteria. Interventions involved protocol development, staff education, electronic health record updates, and a resident-led handoff huddle. Primary outcomes were non-pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) CAA hours and the proportion of patients treated on the GCF. Process measures included protocol use and handoff huddles. Balancing metrics included PICU and emergency transfers, fluid-refractory hypotension, and ED length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From June 2024 to October 2025, GCF CAA accounted for 17% of total hospital CAA, surpassing the 10% target. ED length of stay remained unchanged, indicating no disruption to workflow. We safely treated 72 patients on the GCF (average CAA duration of 21.6 h); 22 (31%) required PICU transfer; none were emergent transfer. This intervention saved 1,017 PICU hours (42.4 PICU bed-days), equivalent to $275,600 in room-and-board costs. These savings represent a substantial reduction in PICU resource use; however, we did not conduct a formal cost-effectiveness analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAA can be safely administered in the GCF following a structured protocol, reducing the need for PICU resources without adversely affecting ED care efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":"11 4","pages":"e896"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13375096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Asthma, a leading cause of pediatric hospitalization, affects more than 6 million US children and costs more than $5 billion annually. Continuous aerosolized albuterol (CAA) effectively treats severe exacerbations but is typically reserved for intensive care or emergency settings. This quality improvement project aimed to safely expand CAA use on the general care floor (GCF) by monitoring treatment uptake, protocol adherence, and safety outcomes.

Methods: This single-center quality improvement project, led by a multidisciplinary team, included children aged 2-18 years with status asthmaticus on CAA who met the inclusion criteria. Interventions involved protocol development, staff education, electronic health record updates, and a resident-led handoff huddle. Primary outcomes were non-pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) CAA hours and the proportion of patients treated on the GCF. Process measures included protocol use and handoff huddles. Balancing metrics included PICU and emergency transfers, fluid-refractory hypotension, and ED length of stay.

Results: From June 2024 to October 2025, GCF CAA accounted for 17% of total hospital CAA, surpassing the 10% target. ED length of stay remained unchanged, indicating no disruption to workflow. We safely treated 72 patients on the GCF (average CAA duration of 21.6 h); 22 (31%) required PICU transfer; none were emergent transfer. This intervention saved 1,017 PICU hours (42.4 PICU bed-days), equivalent to $275,600 in room-and-board costs. These savings represent a substantial reduction in PICU resource use; however, we did not conduct a formal cost-effectiveness analysis.

Conclusions: CAA can be safely administered in the GCF following a structured protocol, reducing the need for PICU resources without adversely affecting ED care efficiency.

持续雾化沙丁胺醇治疗普通护理楼层状态哮喘:质量改进倡议。
简介:哮喘是儿童住院的主要原因,影响了600多万美国儿童,每年花费超过50亿美元。持续雾化沙丁胺醇(CAA)有效治疗严重恶化,但通常用于重症监护或紧急情况。本质量改进项目旨在通过监测治疗接受情况、方案依从性和安全性结果,安全地扩大CAA在普通护理楼层(GCF)的使用。方法:该单中心质量改善项目由多学科团队领导,纳入符合纳入标准的2-18岁CAA哮喘状态儿童。干预措施包括协议制定、员工教育、电子健康记录更新和住院医生领导的交接会议。主要结局是非儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的CAA小时和接受GCF治疗的患者比例。过程度量包括协议使用和交接会议。平衡指标包括PICU和紧急转移、液体难治性低血压和ED住院时间。结果:2024年6月至2025年10月,GCF CAA占医院总CAA的17%,超额完成10%的目标。ED的停留时间保持不变,表明工作流程没有中断。我们安全地治疗了72例GCF患者(平均CAA持续时间为21.6小时);22例(31%)需要PICU转移;没有一个是紧急转移。这一干预措施节省了1,017个PICU小时(42.4个PICU住院日),相当于275,600美元的食宿费用。这些节省意味着PICU资源使用的大幅减少;然而,我们没有进行正式的成本效益分析。结论:CAA可以在GCF中安全使用,遵循结构化的方案,减少对PICU资源的需求,而不会对ED的护理效率产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书