Patient-specific variables predicting triage outcomes of ear, nose, throat referrals from primary care for dysphonia.

IF 2.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Christopher Payten, Duy Duong Nguyen, Kelly Weir, Catherine Madill
{"title":"Patient-specific variables predicting triage outcomes of ear, nose, throat referrals from primary care for dysphonia.","authors":"Christopher Payten, Duy Duong Nguyen, Kelly Weir, Catherine Madill","doi":"10.1186/s12875-026-03435-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with dysphonia are referred to Speech-Language Pathologists (SLP) or Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) surgeons from General Practitioners (GPs) for specialist assessment. Accurate referral information is needed to determine the assessment-pathway and priority. This study aimed to examine which patient-specific information provided in GP referral documents predicted clinicians' triage outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an IRB-approved retrospective study of electronic medical records of 150 voice-disordered adults aged ≥ 18 years referred to a tertiary hospital specialist ENT department between March 1, 2019, and July 1, 2020. Data collected included demographics, voice symptoms, risk factors, and medical history. ENT clinicians triaged all patients to either SLP or ENT assessment-pathway and recommended a priority categorisation. The predictive values of documented information in the referral on assessment triage outcome were analysed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty referrals reported hoarseness as the only symptom, only eight reported three or more symptoms. Female gender, previous smoking history, and current smoking history significantly predicted the ENT-pathway for initial assessment. The same variables plus previous thyroid surgery significantly predicted triage to high-priority assessment. However, a quarter of referral letters did not include information about smoking and alcohol consumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gender and smoking history were significant predictors of triage outcomes. No significant association was found between referral symptoms and the triage outcomes. The exclusion of relevant lifestyle and health information likely impacted decision-making at triage. More detailed information specific to voice disorder risk factors included in GP written referrals may provide critical missing details required to prioritise referrals accurately.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13656379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-026-03435-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with dysphonia are referred to Speech-Language Pathologists (SLP) or Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) surgeons from General Practitioners (GPs) for specialist assessment. Accurate referral information is needed to determine the assessment-pathway and priority. This study aimed to examine which patient-specific information provided in GP referral documents predicted clinicians' triage outcomes.

Methods: This was an IRB-approved retrospective study of electronic medical records of 150 voice-disordered adults aged ≥ 18 years referred to a tertiary hospital specialist ENT department between March 1, 2019, and July 1, 2020. Data collected included demographics, voice symptoms, risk factors, and medical history. ENT clinicians triaged all patients to either SLP or ENT assessment-pathway and recommended a priority categorisation. The predictive values of documented information in the referral on assessment triage outcome were analysed using logistic regression.

Results: Eighty referrals reported hoarseness as the only symptom, only eight reported three or more symptoms. Female gender, previous smoking history, and current smoking history significantly predicted the ENT-pathway for initial assessment. The same variables plus previous thyroid surgery significantly predicted triage to high-priority assessment. However, a quarter of referral letters did not include information about smoking and alcohol consumption.

Conclusion: Gender and smoking history were significant predictors of triage outcomes. No significant association was found between referral symptoms and the triage outcomes. The exclusion of relevant lifestyle and health information likely impacted decision-making at triage. More detailed information specific to voice disorder risk factors included in GP written referrals may provide critical missing details required to prioritise referrals accurately.

患者特异性变量预测耳,鼻,喉从初级保健转介语音障碍的分诊结果。
背景:发声障碍患者被转介给语言病理学家(SLP)或耳鼻喉(ENT)外科医生从全科医生(gp)进行专家评估。需要准确的转诊信息来确定评估途径和优先级。本研究旨在研究在全科医生转诊文件中提供的哪些患者特定信息可以预测临床医生的分诊结果。方法:这是一项经irb批准的回顾性研究,纳入了2019年3月1日至2020年7月1日期间在三级医院专科耳鼻喉科转诊的150名年龄≥18岁的声音障碍成年人的电子病历。收集的数据包括人口统计、声音症状、危险因素和病史。耳鼻喉科临床医生将所有患者分为SLP或耳鼻喉科评估途径,并推荐优先分类。采用logistic回归分析转诊时文献资料对评估分诊结果的预测价值。结果:80名转诊患者报告声音嘶哑为唯一症状,只有8名转诊患者报告三种或三种以上症状。女性性别、既往吸烟史和当前吸烟史对初步评估的ent通路有显著预测作用。同样的变量加上以前的甲状腺手术显著地预测了高优先级评估的分类。然而,四分之一的推荐信没有包括吸烟和饮酒的信息。结论:性别和吸烟史是分诊结果的重要预测因素。在转诊症状和分诊结果之间没有发现显著的关联。排除相关的生活方式和健康信息可能会影响分诊时的决策。更详细的信息,具体到语音障碍的风险因素,包括在全科医生书面转诊可能提供关键缺失的细节,需要准确地优先转诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书