Embodying well-being in research: key principles and praxis.

IF 2.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Frontiers in Education Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-25 DOI:10.3389/feduc.2026.1836519
Hadley Rahrig, Megan Lipsett, Adam B David, Caroline G Richter, Ya-Yun Chen, Em V Adams, Caitlyn L Wilson, Senegal Alfred Mabry, Vincent D Lai, Kathrine Whitman, Grace O Allison, Ellie P Xu, Lindsey Ostermiller, Samantha De Leon Sautu, Claire Laubacher, Christine D Wilson-Mendenhall
{"title":"Embodying well-being in research: key principles and praxis.","authors":"Hadley Rahrig, Megan Lipsett, Adam B David, Caroline G Richter, Ya-Yun Chen, Em V Adams, Caitlyn L Wilson, Senegal Alfred Mabry, Vincent D Lai, Kathrine Whitman, Grace O Allison, Ellie P Xu, Lindsey Ostermiller, Samantha De Leon Sautu, Claire Laubacher, Christine D Wilson-Mendenhall","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2026.1836519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research increasingly points to well-being as a public priority, integral to the health of individuals and communities. In response to pressing societal challenges, many researchers seek to produce scientific knowledge that advances understanding and cultivation of well-being. Academic culture rightly uplifts the products of well-being research-the knowledge that improves people's lives. However, relatively less attention is paid to fostering well-being in the process of conducting such research. Indeed, recent research indicating high rates of anxiety and depression (20%-50%) amongst graduate students and postdocs, suggest a troubling paradox: that the prioritization of well-being research outcomes may come at the expense of researchers' own wellbeing. Early-career scholars, who assume substantial demands within the scientific enterprise, are especially impacted by this tradeoff. Yet, they are uniquely positioned to re-envision a praxis for research that embeds well-being in both its products and processes. Developed by an interdisciplinary coalition of early-career scholars, this perspective paper identifies key barriers to fostering well-being in research, and in turn, proposes four guiding principles and corresponding practices: 1) cultivate belonging, 2) center communities, 3) question cultural systems, and 4) embody cultural change. In turn, these principles aim to advance the societal impact of well-being research through community-based, participatory approaches that promote solidarity between researchers and communities historically excluded from the research enterprise.</p>","PeriodicalId":52290,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Education","volume":"11 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13375101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1836519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research increasingly points to well-being as a public priority, integral to the health of individuals and communities. In response to pressing societal challenges, many researchers seek to produce scientific knowledge that advances understanding and cultivation of well-being. Academic culture rightly uplifts the products of well-being research-the knowledge that improves people's lives. However, relatively less attention is paid to fostering well-being in the process of conducting such research. Indeed, recent research indicating high rates of anxiety and depression (20%-50%) amongst graduate students and postdocs, suggest a troubling paradox: that the prioritization of well-being research outcomes may come at the expense of researchers' own wellbeing. Early-career scholars, who assume substantial demands within the scientific enterprise, are especially impacted by this tradeoff. Yet, they are uniquely positioned to re-envision a praxis for research that embeds well-being in both its products and processes. Developed by an interdisciplinary coalition of early-career scholars, this perspective paper identifies key barriers to fostering well-being in research, and in turn, proposes four guiding principles and corresponding practices: 1) cultivate belonging, 2) center communities, 3) question cultural systems, and 4) embody cultural change. In turn, these principles aim to advance the societal impact of well-being research through community-based, participatory approaches that promote solidarity between researchers and communities historically excluded from the research enterprise.

在研究中体现幸福:关键原则和实践。
研究越来越多地指出,福祉是一项公共优先事项,是个人和社区健康的组成部分。为了应对紧迫的社会挑战,许多研究人员寻求产生科学知识,以促进对福祉的理解和培养。学术文化正确地提升了福祉研究的成果——改善人们生活的知识。然而,在进行此类研究的过程中,对促进福祉的关注相对较少。事实上,最近的研究表明,研究生和博士后中焦虑和抑郁的比例很高(20%-50%),这表明了一个令人不安的悖论:幸福研究成果的优先级可能是以牺牲研究人员自己的幸福为代价的。在科学事业中承担大量需求的早期职业学者尤其受到这种权衡的影响。然而,他们处于独特的地位,可以重新设想一种将福祉嵌入其产品和过程中的研究实践。由跨学科的早期职业学者联盟开发,这篇观点论文确定了促进研究幸福感的主要障碍,并提出了四个指导原则和相应的实践:1)培养归属感,2)中心社区,3)质疑文化系统,4)体现文化变革。反过来,这些原则旨在通过以社区为基础的参与性方法,促进研究人员和历史上被排除在研究事业之外的社区之间的团结,促进福祉研究的社会影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Education
Frontiers in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
887
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书