Collaborating across academia and local government: augmenting the use of academically produced evidence.

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Tom Douglass, Ewen Speed, Aaron Wyllie, Jack Head, Rejoice Frimpong, Dimitra Mouriki
{"title":"Collaborating across academia and local government: augmenting the use of academically produced evidence.","authors":"Tom Douglass, Ewen Speed, Aaron Wyllie, Jack Head, Rejoice Frimpong, Dimitra Mouriki","doi":"10.1332/17442648Y2026D000000103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the UK, increasing attention is being given to strengthening the use of academically produced evidence within local government. Recent investment from the National Institute for Health and Care Research has supported various initiatives designed to foster closer collaboration between universities and local authorities. This includes the Health Determinants Research Collaborations (HDRCs) and a separate researcher-in-residence programme focused on social care. While existing literatures explore research-practice partnerships, embedded research, knowledge mobilisation and evidence use, there remains considerable value in sharing reflections emerging from these recently funded forms of collaboration. Drawing on experiences within one HDRC and from a researcher-in-residence, this reflective article examines efforts to strengthen engagement with academically produced evidence within the public health and social care functions of local government. In reflecting on these experiences, we draw on a conceptual framework which emphasises the importance of capacity, motivation and opportunity in shaping engagement with research evidence. We organise our reflections around three themes: (1) developing engagement with academically produced evidence; (2) negotiating time, pace and policy pressures; and (3) communication, language and professional cultures. Across these areas, we identify recurring tensions and challenges that emerge when academia and local government work together, while also highlighting practical strategies that may strengthen engagement with research evidence. Our experiences suggest that effective collaboration depends not only on producing robust research findings, but also on sustained engagement with research processes, shared expectations around time and policy relevance, and accessible forms of communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648Y2026D000000103","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the UK, increasing attention is being given to strengthening the use of academically produced evidence within local government. Recent investment from the National Institute for Health and Care Research has supported various initiatives designed to foster closer collaboration between universities and local authorities. This includes the Health Determinants Research Collaborations (HDRCs) and a separate researcher-in-residence programme focused on social care. While existing literatures explore research-practice partnerships, embedded research, knowledge mobilisation and evidence use, there remains considerable value in sharing reflections emerging from these recently funded forms of collaboration. Drawing on experiences within one HDRC and from a researcher-in-residence, this reflective article examines efforts to strengthen engagement with academically produced evidence within the public health and social care functions of local government. In reflecting on these experiences, we draw on a conceptual framework which emphasises the importance of capacity, motivation and opportunity in shaping engagement with research evidence. We organise our reflections around three themes: (1) developing engagement with academically produced evidence; (2) negotiating time, pace and policy pressures; and (3) communication, language and professional cultures. Across these areas, we identify recurring tensions and challenges that emerge when academia and local government work together, while also highlighting practical strategies that may strengthen engagement with research evidence. Our experiences suggest that effective collaboration depends not only on producing robust research findings, but also on sustained engagement with research processes, shared expectations around time and policy relevance, and accessible forms of communication.

在学术界和地方政府之间开展合作:扩大对学术证据的使用。
在英国,人们越来越重视在地方政府内部加强对学术证据的使用。国家卫生和保健研究所最近的投资支持了旨在促进大学和地方当局之间更密切合作的各种倡议。这包括健康决定因素研究合作(HDRCs)和侧重于社会保健的单独的驻院研究人员规划。虽然现有文献探讨了研究实践伙伴关系、嵌入式研究、知识动员和证据使用,但分享这些最近资助的合作形式所产生的反思仍然具有相当大的价值。这篇反思性文章借鉴了一个HDRC内部和一名驻院研究员的经验,审查了在地方政府公共卫生和社会保健职能范围内加强与学术证据接触的努力。在反思这些经验时,我们借鉴了一个概念框架,该框架强调了能力、动机和机会在塑造参与研究证据方面的重要性。我们围绕三个主题组织我们的反思:(1)发展与学术证据的接触;(2)谈判时间、节奏和政策压力;(3)沟通、语言和专业文化。在这些领域,我们确定了学术界和地方政府合作时出现的反复出现的紧张局势和挑战,同时也强调了可能加强研究证据参与的实用策略。我们的经验表明,有效的合作不仅取决于产生强有力的研究成果,还取决于对研究过程的持续参与,对时间和政策相关性的共同期望,以及可获取的沟通形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence & Policy
Evidence & Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书