Quality of Life, Symptom Burden, and Associated Factors Among Patients With Lung Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.6 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2026-07-16 DOI:10.2196/87232
Mpho Ratshikana, Kija Malale, Abdul-Rauf Sayed, Oluwatosin Ayeni, Peedi Mathobela, Rofhiwa Mathiba, Charmaine Blanchard, Merika Tsitsi, Daniel Osei-Fofie, Anita Graham, Herry Owuor Dhudha, Nestory Masalu
{"title":"Quality of Life, Symptom Burden, and Associated Factors Among Patients With Lung Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Mpho Ratshikana, Kija Malale, Abdul-Rauf Sayed, Oluwatosin Ayeni, Peedi Mathobela, Rofhiwa Mathiba, Charmaine Blanchard, Merika Tsitsi, Daniel Osei-Fofie, Anita Graham, Herry Owuor Dhudha, Nestory Masalu","doi":"10.2196/87232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer remains a major contributor to cancer mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where late diagnosis, driven by low awareness, sociocultural barriers, and health system constraints, limits effective treatment. Despite the growing burden, evidence on patients' quality of life (QoL) and symptom experience in SSA is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to describe the common symptoms and QoL of patients with lung cancer treated at 2 hospitals in SSA, and to investigate the association of demographics, clinical characteristics, and symptom burden with QoL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study that consecutively recruited patients with lung cancer from 2 teaching hospitals in SSA: Bugando Medical Centre (BMC) in Tanzania and the University of the Witwatersrand Centre of Respiratory Excellence (WITS-CORE) in South Africa. Data collected included demographics, clinical information, and performance status using the Eastern Cooperative Oncological Group Performance Scale (ECOG-PS). Health-related QoL was assessed using the 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The study followed all ethical procedures, and data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics in Stata 18. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 174 patients with lung cancer were enrolled across the 2 sites. The score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL subscale was low, with a median of 41.67 (IQR 33.33-41.67), and it varied by site. Patients from WITS-CORE demonstrated higher social functioning scores, while those from BMC reported greater financial difficulties. A low global health status/QoL score was independently associated with the BMC site (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.3) and poor performance status (ECOG-PS 3-4; aOR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2-6.6). Furthermore, symptoms such as nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, diarrhea, and financial struggles were all associated with a low global health status/QoL score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QoL among patients with lung cancer in SSA is poor. Low QoL is strongly associated with the Multinational Lung Cancer Control Program study site, poor performance status, and a range of symptoms and financial difficulties. Addressing these factors may help to improve patient outcomes and well-being in SSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":"12 ","pages":"e87232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13424756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/87232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer remains a major contributor to cancer mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where late diagnosis, driven by low awareness, sociocultural barriers, and health system constraints, limits effective treatment. Despite the growing burden, evidence on patients' quality of life (QoL) and symptom experience in SSA is limited.

Objective: This study aimed to describe the common symptoms and QoL of patients with lung cancer treated at 2 hospitals in SSA, and to investigate the association of demographics, clinical characteristics, and symptom burden with QoL.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that consecutively recruited patients with lung cancer from 2 teaching hospitals in SSA: Bugando Medical Centre (BMC) in Tanzania and the University of the Witwatersrand Centre of Respiratory Excellence (WITS-CORE) in South Africa. Data collected included demographics, clinical information, and performance status using the Eastern Cooperative Oncological Group Performance Scale (ECOG-PS). Health-related QoL was assessed using the 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The study followed all ethical procedures, and data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics in Stata 18. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: A total of 174 patients with lung cancer were enrolled across the 2 sites. The score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL subscale was low, with a median of 41.67 (IQR 33.33-41.67), and it varied by site. Patients from WITS-CORE demonstrated higher social functioning scores, while those from BMC reported greater financial difficulties. A low global health status/QoL score was independently associated with the BMC site (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.3) and poor performance status (ECOG-PS 3-4; aOR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2-6.6). Furthermore, symptoms such as nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, diarrhea, and financial struggles were all associated with a low global health status/QoL score.

Conclusions: QoL among patients with lung cancer in SSA is poor. Low QoL is strongly associated with the Multinational Lung Cancer Control Program study site, poor performance status, and a range of symptoms and financial difficulties. Addressing these factors may help to improve patient outcomes and well-being in SSA.

撒哈拉以南非洲地区肺癌患者的生活质量、症状负担和相关因素:横断面研究
背景:在撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA),肺癌仍然是癌症死亡的主要原因,在那里,由于意识不高、社会文化障碍和卫生系统限制,晚期诊断限制了有效治疗。尽管负担越来越大,但关于SSA患者生活质量(QoL)和症状体验的证据有限。目的:本研究旨在描述SSA两家医院肺癌患者的常见症状和生活质量,并探讨人口统计学、临床特征和症状负担与生活质量的关系。方法:这是一项横断面研究,连续招募来自SSA两家教学医院的肺癌患者:坦桑尼亚的Bugando医学中心(BMC)和南非的Witwatersrand大学呼吸系统卓越中心(WITS-CORE)。收集的数据包括人口统计、临床信息和使用东部合作肿瘤小组绩效量表(ECOG-PS)的绩效状况。与健康相关的生活质量采用30项欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)进行评估。该研究遵循了所有伦理程序,并使用Stata 18中的描述性和推断性统计对数据进行了分析。结果的A P值:两组共入组174例肺癌患者。EORTC QLQ-C30整体健康状态/生活质量量表得分较低,中位数为41.67 (IQR为33.33-41.67),且因地区而异。来自WITS-CORE的患者表现出更高的社会功能评分,而来自BMC的患者则报告了更大的经济困难。整体健康状态/生活质量评分较低与BMC部位(调整优势比[aOR] 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.3)和不良的工作状态(ECOG-PS 3-4; aOR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2-6.6)独立相关。此外,恶心和呕吐、疼痛、呼吸困难、失眠、食欲不振、腹泻和经济困难等症状都与较低的整体健康状况/生活质量评分有关。结论:SSA区肺癌患者生活质量较差。低生活质量与多国肺癌控制计划研究地点、不良表现状态、一系列症状和经济困难密切相关。解决这些因素可能有助于改善SSA患者的预后和幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书