Trends in Treatment Decisions for Distal Radius Fractures: The Effect of a Guideline Change.

IF 4.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2026-07-17 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.26.00061
Ofir Vinograd, Erez Avisar, Jonathan Persitz, Ahmad Essa, Orna Tal, Adi Vinograd
{"title":"Trends in Treatment Decisions for Distal Radius Fractures: The Effect of a Guideline Change.","authors":"Ofir Vinograd, Erez Avisar, Jonathan Persitz, Ahmad Essa, Orna Tal, Adi Vinograd","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.26.00061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2022 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons/American Society for Surgery of the Hand (AAOS/ASSH) guideline discourages routine operative fixation of distal radius fractures (DRF) in patients aged 65 years or older. This study examined the impact of this recommendation on operative management patterns in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, quasi-experimental before-after study was conducted, including all DRF diagnoses among patients aged 65 years or older at a tertiary medical center during 2012 to 2024. Annual age-standardized and sex-standardized DRF incidence and surgery rates were estimated. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated postguideline versus preguideline odds of surgery and model-based projection compared expected with observed postguideline surgery rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 3,137 DRF cases were diagnosed with stable incidence. Surgery rates significantly increased among patients aged 65 to 69 years from 9% to 16% after guideline publication, whereas rates were unchanged in patients aged 70 years or older. Patients aged 65 to 69 years were nearly twice as likely to undergo operative management in the postguideline versus preguideline period. Model-based projection among patients aged 65 to 69 years predicted a postguideline surgery rate of 11%, whereas the observed rate of 16% represented a 44% relative increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite a guideline discouraging operative management of DRF at ages ≥65 years, surgery rates did not decline, and increased in those aged 65 to 69 years, highlighting the limitations of an age-only treatment threshold.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13375063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.26.00061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 2022 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons/American Society for Surgery of the Hand (AAOS/ASSH) guideline discourages routine operative fixation of distal radius fractures (DRF) in patients aged 65 years or older. This study examined the impact of this recommendation on operative management patterns in this population.

Methods: A retrospective, quasi-experimental before-after study was conducted, including all DRF diagnoses among patients aged 65 years or older at a tertiary medical center during 2012 to 2024. Annual age-standardized and sex-standardized DRF incidence and surgery rates were estimated. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated postguideline versus preguideline odds of surgery and model-based projection compared expected with observed postguideline surgery rates.

Results: During the study period, 3,137 DRF cases were diagnosed with stable incidence. Surgery rates significantly increased among patients aged 65 to 69 years from 9% to 16% after guideline publication, whereas rates were unchanged in patients aged 70 years or older. Patients aged 65 to 69 years were nearly twice as likely to undergo operative management in the postguideline versus preguideline period. Model-based projection among patients aged 65 to 69 years predicted a postguideline surgery rate of 11%, whereas the observed rate of 16% represented a 44% relative increase.

Conclusions: Despite a guideline discouraging operative management of DRF at ages ≥65 years, surgery rates did not decline, and increased in those aged 65 to 69 years, highlighting the limitations of an age-only treatment threshold.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

桡骨远端骨折治疗决策的趋势:指南改变的影响。
背景:2022年美国骨科学会/美国手部外科学会(AAOS/ASSH)指南不鼓励65岁及以上患者桡骨远端骨折(DRF)的常规手术固定。本研究考察了这一建议对该人群手术管理模式的影响。方法:采用回顾性、准实验的前后对照研究,纳入2012年至2024年在三级医疗中心就诊的65岁及以上的所有DRF诊断患者。估计年度年龄标准化和性别标准化DRF发病率和手术率。多变量逻辑回归评估指南后与指南前的手术几率,并将基于模型的预测与指南后的预期手术率进行比较。结果:在研究期间,3137例DRF被诊断为发病率稳定。指南发布后,65 - 69岁患者的手术率显著增加,从9%增加到16%,而70岁及以上患者的手术率不变。65至69岁的患者在指南后接受手术治疗的可能性几乎是指南前的两倍。在65岁至69岁的患者中,基于模型的预测预测指南后手术率为11%,而观察到的16%的比率代表了44%的相对增长。结论:尽管指南不鼓励对≥65岁的DRF进行手术治疗,但手术率并未下降,在65至69岁的人群中反而有所增加,这突出了仅针对年龄的治疗阈值的局限性。证据等级:治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书