Robot-assisted versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer in the pancreatic head (DIPLOMA-2x2): study protocol for an international multicentre patient- and assessor-blinded randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2026-07-16 DOI:10.1186/s13063-026-09692-6
Nine de Graaf, Caro L Bruna, Julia E Menso, Anouk M L H Emmen, Bergthor Björnsson, Hakon Blomstrand, Ugo Boggi, Bert Bonsing, Olivier R Busch, Daniela Campani, Valentina Caputo, Tiane Chen, Annalisa Comandatore, A Stijn L P Crobach, Freek Daams, Wouter Derksen, Michail Doukas, Ann Driessen, Alessandro Esposito, Giovanni Ferrari, Sebastiaan Festen, Raffaele Gaeta, Michael Ginesini, Martina Guerra, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Thilo Hackert, Vera Hartman, Jin He, Ignace de Hingh, Jony van Hilst, Casper Jansen, Tobias Keck, Pui Y Lee, Mike S L Liem, Daan J Lips, Thomas Longerich, Martin Loos, Claudio Luchini, Misha D P Luyer, Michele Mazzola, Christoph W Michalski, J Sven D Mieog, Katharina Möller, Luca Morelli, I Quintus Molenaar, Felix Nickel, Mihaela Raicu, Geert Roeyen, Christian Watermann, Ulrich Wellner, Roeland F de Wilde, Roberto Salvia, Per Sandström, Johanna W Wilmink, Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta, Mahsoem Ali, Johannes Berkhof, Patrick Maisonneuve, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Marc G Besselink
{"title":"Robot-assisted versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer in the pancreatic head (DIPLOMA-2x2): study protocol for an international multicentre patient- and assessor-blinded randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.","authors":"Nine de Graaf, Caro L Bruna, Julia E Menso, Anouk M L H Emmen, Bergthor Björnsson, Hakon Blomstrand, Ugo Boggi, Bert Bonsing, Olivier R Busch, Daniela Campani, Valentina Caputo, Tiane Chen, Annalisa Comandatore, A Stijn L P Crobach, Freek Daams, Wouter Derksen, Michail Doukas, Ann Driessen, Alessandro Esposito, Giovanni Ferrari, Sebastiaan Festen, Raffaele Gaeta, Michael Ginesini, Martina Guerra, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Thilo Hackert, Vera Hartman, Jin He, Ignace de Hingh, Jony van Hilst, Casper Jansen, Tobias Keck, Pui Y Lee, Mike S L Liem, Daan J Lips, Thomas Longerich, Martin Loos, Claudio Luchini, Misha D P Luyer, Michele Mazzola, Christoph W Michalski, J Sven D Mieog, Katharina Möller, Luca Morelli, I Quintus Molenaar, Felix Nickel, Mihaela Raicu, Geert Roeyen, Christian Watermann, Ulrich Wellner, Roeland F de Wilde, Roberto Salvia, Per Sandström, Johanna W Wilmink, Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta, Mahsoem Ali, Johannes Berkhof, Patrick Maisonneuve, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Marc G Besselink","doi":"10.1186/s13063-026-09692-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is increasingly performed for cancer in the pancreatic head. Randomised evidence confirming its oncological safety and efficacy is lacking. The DIPLOMA-2x2 trial aims to compare the oncological safety of RPD versus OPD in terms of radicality (microscopically radical resection [R0] resection). We hypothesise that RPD is non-inferior to OPD in terms of radicality and superior regarding time to functional recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The DIPLOMA-2x2 trial is an investigator-initiated, international, multicentre, patient- and assessor-blinded randomised non-inferiority trial. The trial was conducted as a roll-over of the DIPLOMA-2 trial and includes 20 high-volume tertiary referral hospitals in 7 countries. Minimum surgeon's experience is 60 RPD and 60 OPD, with a minimum annual centre volume of 30 RPD prior to trial initiation. Eligible patients are adults (≥18 years) with suspected or proven upfront resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) without any vascular involvement. Participants are randomised in a 2:1 ratio to RPD or OPD, respectively, stratified by tumour indication (proven PDAC versus other) and preoperative pancreatic fistula risk (high versus low). In total, 413 patients will be included, of which 137 previously randomised in DIPLOMA-2 and 276 newly recruited in DIPLOMA-2x2. Patients are blinded up to postoperative day 5. Primary outcome is pathological R0-resection rate (pR0; >1 mm tumour clearance at surgical resection margins and anatomical surfaces, 0 mm clearance at anterior surface), tested for non-inferiority with a -7% margin. Pathological assessment is blinded, and a randomly selected 10% of specimen will undergo central review. The key secondary outcome, tested for superiority, is time to functional recovery. Other secondary outcomes include lymph node retrieval, initiation/completion of adjuvant therapy, time to start of adjuvant therapy, disease-free and overall survival, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Safety outcomes include major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III), serious adverse events, and 90-day mortality. Primary analyses will be based on the modified intention-to-treat principle, including all patients who underwent resection. Postoperative follow-up is up to 90 days for short-term outcomes and up to 60 months for survival.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The DIPLOMA-2x2 trial evaluates whether RPD is oncologically safe compared to OPD in patients with upfront resectable PDAC and DCC in experienced high-volume centres.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN27483786. Registered: January 11, 2021 (updated: February 6, 2025). First enrolment: January 3, 2021. Expected completion of enrolment: May 2026.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13656715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09692-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is increasingly performed for cancer in the pancreatic head. Randomised evidence confirming its oncological safety and efficacy is lacking. The DIPLOMA-2x2 trial aims to compare the oncological safety of RPD versus OPD in terms of radicality (microscopically radical resection [R0] resection). We hypothesise that RPD is non-inferior to OPD in terms of radicality and superior regarding time to functional recovery.

Methods: The DIPLOMA-2x2 trial is an investigator-initiated, international, multicentre, patient- and assessor-blinded randomised non-inferiority trial. The trial was conducted as a roll-over of the DIPLOMA-2 trial and includes 20 high-volume tertiary referral hospitals in 7 countries. Minimum surgeon's experience is 60 RPD and 60 OPD, with a minimum annual centre volume of 30 RPD prior to trial initiation. Eligible patients are adults (≥18 years) with suspected or proven upfront resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) without any vascular involvement. Participants are randomised in a 2:1 ratio to RPD or OPD, respectively, stratified by tumour indication (proven PDAC versus other) and preoperative pancreatic fistula risk (high versus low). In total, 413 patients will be included, of which 137 previously randomised in DIPLOMA-2 and 276 newly recruited in DIPLOMA-2x2. Patients are blinded up to postoperative day 5. Primary outcome is pathological R0-resection rate (pR0; >1 mm tumour clearance at surgical resection margins and anatomical surfaces, 0 mm clearance at anterior surface), tested for non-inferiority with a -7% margin. Pathological assessment is blinded, and a randomly selected 10% of specimen will undergo central review. The key secondary outcome, tested for superiority, is time to functional recovery. Other secondary outcomes include lymph node retrieval, initiation/completion of adjuvant therapy, time to start of adjuvant therapy, disease-free and overall survival, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Safety outcomes include major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III), serious adverse events, and 90-day mortality. Primary analyses will be based on the modified intention-to-treat principle, including all patients who underwent resection. Postoperative follow-up is up to 90 days for short-term outcomes and up to 60 months for survival.

Discussion: The DIPLOMA-2x2 trial evaluates whether RPD is oncologically safe compared to OPD in patients with upfront resectable PDAC and DCC in experienced high-volume centres.

Trial registration: ISRCTN27483786. Registered: January 11, 2021 (updated: February 6, 2025). First enrolment: January 3, 2021. Expected completion of enrolment: May 2026.

机器人辅助胰头癌与开放式胰十二指肠切除术(DIPLOMA-2x2):一项国际多中心患者和评估者盲法随机对照非劣效性试验的研究方案。
背景:机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)越来越多地用于胰头癌。缺乏证实其肿瘤安全性和有效性的随机证据。DIPLOMA-2x2试验旨在比较RPD与OPD在根治性(显微根治性切除[R0])方面的肿瘤学安全性。我们假设RPD在根治性方面不逊于OPD,在功能恢复时间方面优于OPD。方法:DIPLOMA-2x2试验是一项研究者发起的、国际性、多中心、患者和评估者盲法随机非劣效性试验。该试验是对DIPLOMA-2试验的延续,包括7个国家的20家大容量三级转诊医院。最低的外科医生经验是60个RPD和60个OPD,在试验开始之前,至少每年30个RPD的中心容量。符合条件的患者为成人(≥18岁),怀疑或证实患有可切除的前部胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)和远端胆管癌(DCC),没有任何血管受损伤。参与者分别以2:1的比例随机分配到RPD或OPD,根据肿瘤适应症(证实的PDAC与其他)和术前胰瘘风险(高与低)分层。总共将纳入413名患者,其中137名先前随机分配到DIPLOMA-2中,276名新招募到DIPLOMA-2x2中。患者在术后第5天失明。主要结局是病理r0 -切除率(pR0; >,手术切除边缘和解剖表面肿瘤清除率为1mm,前表面清除率为0mm),非劣效性测试为-7%。病理评估采用盲法,随机抽取10%的标本进行中心复查。关键的次要结果是功能恢复的时间。其他次要结局包括淋巴结恢复、辅助治疗的开始/完成、开始辅助治疗的时间、无病生存期和总生存期、生活质量和成本效益。安全性结局包括主要并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级≥III)、严重不良事件和90天死亡率。初步分析将基于改良的意向治疗原则,包括所有接受切除术的患者。术后随访时间为90天,短期随访时间为60个月。讨论:在经验丰富的大容量中心,DIPLOMA-2x2试验评估了在术前可切除的PDAC和DCC患者中,与OPD相比,RPD在肿瘤学上是否安全。试验注册:ISRCTN27483786。注册日期:2021年1月11日(更新日期:2025年2月6日)。首次入学时间:2021年1月3日。预计入学完成时间:2026年5月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书