Clinical Outcomes after Onset of Mirogabalin-Related Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Post Hoc Analysis of the MiroTAS Study.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-18 DOI:10.1007/s40122-026-00855-6
Takuya Nikaido, Kazuhito Shiosakai, Hiroshi Sakoda
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes after Onset of Mirogabalin-Related Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Post Hoc Analysis of the MiroTAS Study.","authors":"Takuya Nikaido, Kazuhito Shiosakai, Hiroshi Sakoda","doi":"10.1007/s40122-026-00855-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The MiroTAS study demonstrated the pain-relieving effect and safety of mirogabalin in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS); however, whether mirogabalin-related adverse drug reactions (mrADRs) affect clinical courses, treatment continuation, or adherence remained unknown. We examined recovery outcomes and treatment status following mrADR onset and whether the analgesic effects of mirogabalin correlated with LSS and leg pain durations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This post hoc analysis of the 12-week, randomized controlled MiroTAS study summarized mrADRs (dizziness, somnolence, peripheral edema, and edema) by severity and outcome. Spearman's rank correlations between leg pain changes and duration of LSS and leg pain were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 214 patients in the modified intention-to-treat set (mirogabalin add-on: 110; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone: 104) and 216 in the safety analysis set (110 and 106 patients, respectively) were analyzed. Regarding mrADRs, 27/33 dizziness, 25/35 somnolence, 3/6 peripheral edema, and 2/2 edema events recovered or improved. Median times to recovery for dizziness and somnolence were 8.0 and 33.5 days, respectively. Recovery or improvement of dizziness and somnolence occurred in most patients even without dose modification, with a higher proportion of recovery following dose reduction. Most events with moderate dizziness or somnolence (80.0% and 85.7%, respectively) recovered or improved. In the mirogabalin add-on group, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients showed weak positive correlations between change in visual analogue scale (VAS) score for leg pain from baseline to week 12 and LSS duration (P = 0.0269) and no correlation between leg pain duration and change in VAS score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that dizziness and somnolence are generally manageable under careful monitoring, with most events recovered or improved after onset. The analgesic effect of mirogabalin was weakly associated with LSS duration and not associated with leg pain duration. However, this was a post hoc analysis; given the limited sample size and statistical power, further research is needed.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs021200007).</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1433-1445"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13624239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-026-00855-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The MiroTAS study demonstrated the pain-relieving effect and safety of mirogabalin in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS); however, whether mirogabalin-related adverse drug reactions (mrADRs) affect clinical courses, treatment continuation, or adherence remained unknown. We examined recovery outcomes and treatment status following mrADR onset and whether the analgesic effects of mirogabalin correlated with LSS and leg pain durations.

Methods: This post hoc analysis of the 12-week, randomized controlled MiroTAS study summarized mrADRs (dizziness, somnolence, peripheral edema, and edema) by severity and outcome. Spearman's rank correlations between leg pain changes and duration of LSS and leg pain were examined.

Results: Data from 214 patients in the modified intention-to-treat set (mirogabalin add-on: 110; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone: 104) and 216 in the safety analysis set (110 and 106 patients, respectively) were analyzed. Regarding mrADRs, 27/33 dizziness, 25/35 somnolence, 3/6 peripheral edema, and 2/2 edema events recovered or improved. Median times to recovery for dizziness and somnolence were 8.0 and 33.5 days, respectively. Recovery or improvement of dizziness and somnolence occurred in most patients even without dose modification, with a higher proportion of recovery following dose reduction. Most events with moderate dizziness or somnolence (80.0% and 85.7%, respectively) recovered or improved. In the mirogabalin add-on group, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients showed weak positive correlations between change in visual analogue scale (VAS) score for leg pain from baseline to week 12 and LSS duration (P = 0.0269) and no correlation between leg pain duration and change in VAS score.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that dizziness and somnolence are generally manageable under careful monitoring, with most events recovered or improved after onset. The analgesic effect of mirogabalin was weakly associated with LSS duration and not associated with leg pain duration. However, this was a post hoc analysis; given the limited sample size and statistical power, further research is needed.

Clinical trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs021200007).

腰椎管狭窄患者发生米罗巴林相关药物不良反应后的临床结果:MiroTAS研究的事后分析
导语:MiroTAS研究证实了米罗巴林对腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者的镇痛效果和安全性;然而,与米罗巴林相关的药物不良反应(mradr)是否影响临床过程、治疗持续或依从性仍然未知。我们检查了mrADR发生后的恢复结果和治疗状态,以及米罗巴林的镇痛作用是否与LSS和腿部疼痛持续时间相关。方法:这项为期12周的随机对照MiroTAS研究的事后分析总结了mradr(头晕、嗜睡、外周水肿和水肿)的严重程度和结果。检查腿痛变化与LSS和腿痛持续时间之间的Spearman秩相关。结果:214例患者的数据被纳入改良意向治疗组(加用米罗巴林组:110例;单独使用非甾体抗炎药组:104例),216例患者的数据被纳入安全性分析组(分别为110例和106例)。在mradr中,27/33的头晕、25/35的嗜睡、3/6的外周水肿和2/2的水肿事件恢复或改善。头晕和嗜睡的中位恢复时间分别为8.0天和33.5天。大多数患者即使不调整剂量也能恢复或改善头晕和嗜睡,减少剂量后恢复的比例更高。大多数中度头晕或嗜睡事件(分别为80.0%和85.7%)恢复或改善。在米罗巴林附加组中,Spearman等级相关系数显示从基线到第12周腿部疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分变化与LSS持续时间之间呈弱正相关(P = 0.0269),而腿部疼痛持续时间与VAS评分变化之间无相关性。结论:我们的数据表明,在仔细监测下,头晕和嗜睡通常是可控的,大多数事件在发病后恢复或改善。米罗巴林的镇痛作用与LSS持续时间呈弱相关,与腿部疼痛持续时间无相关性。然而,这是一个事后分析;考虑到有限的样本量和统计能力,需要进一步的研究。临床试验注册:日本临床试验注册中心(jRCTs021200007)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain and Therapy
Pain and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书