The Q $$ Q $$ -Score: A Magnitude-Weighted Goodness-of-Fit Score for Earthquake Forecasting

IF 1.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmetrics Pub Date : 2026-07-14 DOI:10.1002/env.70113
Julia Jansson Valter, Alejandra Arjon, Francesco Serafini, Frederic Schoenberg
{"title":"The \n \n \n Q\n \n $$ Q $$\n -Score: A Magnitude-Weighted Goodness-of-Fit Score for Earthquake Forecasting","authors":"Julia Jansson Valter,&nbsp;Alejandra Arjon,&nbsp;Francesco Serafini,&nbsp;Frederic Schoenberg","doi":"10.1002/env.70113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate forecasting of large earthquakes is of great importance, yet most current earthquake forecast evaluation metrics, such as the log-likelihood score, do not give additional weight to large-magnitude events. To this end, magnitude-weighted goodness-of-fit scores for earthquake forecasting have recently been introduced, such as potency-weighted log-likelihood and the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ Q $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-score. In this article, we investigate properties of the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ Q $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-score, which is a quotient emphasizing model fit for the largest 5% of earthquakes. We explore the theoretical properties of the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ Q $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-score, demonstrating that under certain null conditions, the expectations of the numerator and denominator are equal and thus the expectation of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ Q $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is 1 in a ratio sense. Additionally, the score satisfies a law of large numbers. We evaluated the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ Q $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-score of 21 next-day gridded earthquake forecasts for California, provided by the Collaborative for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) for the years 2012, 2014, and 2017. We also calculate the log-likelihood scores of the forecasts to obtain a more comprehensive evaluation of how well different models perform, both for predicting the largest events and also in terms of overall model fit.</p>","PeriodicalId":50512,"journal":{"name":"Environmetrics","volume":"37 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/env.70113","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmetrics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.70113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of large earthquakes is of great importance, yet most current earthquake forecast evaluation metrics, such as the log-likelihood score, do not give additional weight to large-magnitude events. To this end, magnitude-weighted goodness-of-fit scores for earthquake forecasting have recently been introduced, such as potency-weighted log-likelihood and the Q $$ Q $$ -score. In this article, we investigate properties of the Q $$ Q $$ -score, which is a quotient emphasizing model fit for the largest 5% of earthquakes. We explore the theoretical properties of the Q $$ Q $$ -score, demonstrating that under certain null conditions, the expectations of the numerator and denominator are equal and thus the expectation of Q $$ Q $$ is 1 in a ratio sense. Additionally, the score satisfies a law of large numbers. We evaluated the Q $$ Q $$ -score of 21 next-day gridded earthquake forecasts for California, provided by the Collaborative for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) for the years 2012, 2014, and 2017. We also calculate the log-likelihood scores of the forecasts to obtain a more comprehensive evaluation of how well different models perform, both for predicting the largest events and also in terms of overall model fit.

Abstract Image

Q $$ Q $$ -分数:地震预报的震级加权拟合优度分数
大地震的准确预报是非常重要的,然而目前大多数地震预报评价指标,如对数似然评分,并没有给大震级事件额外的权重。为此,最近引入了地震预报的震级加权拟合优度分数,如势加权对数似然和Q $$ Q $$分数。在本文中,我们研究了Q $$ Q $$ -score的性质,它是一个商强调模型,适合于最大的5% of earthquakes. We explore the theoretical properties of the Q $$ Q $$ -score, demonstrating that under certain null conditions, the expectations of the numerator and denominator are equal and thus the expectation of Q $$ Q $$ is 1 in a ratio sense. Additionally, the score satisfies a law of large numbers. We evaluated the Q $$ Q $$ -score of 21 next-day gridded earthquake forecasts for California, provided by the Collaborative for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) for the years 2012, 2014, and 2017. We also calculate the log-likelihood scores of the forecasts to obtain a more comprehensive evaluation of how well different models perform, both for predicting the largest events and also in terms of overall model fit.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmetrics
Environmetrics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
67
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmetrics, the official journal of The International Environmetrics Society (TIES), an Association of the International Statistical Institute, is devoted to the dissemination of high-quality quantitative research in the environmental sciences. The journal welcomes pertinent and innovative submissions from quantitative disciplines developing new statistical and mathematical techniques, methods, and theories that solve modern environmental problems. Articles must proffer substantive, new statistical or mathematical advances to answer important scientific questions in the environmental sciences, or must develop novel or enhanced statistical methodology with clear applications to environmental science. New methods should be illustrated with recent environmental data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书