What Makes the Best Educator? A Qualitative Analysis of Emergency Medicine Resident Perspectives

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Marshall Howell, Joshua Ginsburg, Erin Lincoln, C. Reece Brockman II, D. Mark Courtney, Brian Milman
{"title":"What Makes the Best Educator? A Qualitative Analysis of Emergency Medicine Resident Perspectives","authors":"Marshall Howell,&nbsp;Joshua Ginsburg,&nbsp;Erin Lincoln,&nbsp;C. Reece Brockman II,&nbsp;D. Mark Courtney,&nbsp;Brian Milman","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Effective clinical educators are essential to emergency medicine (EM) residency training, and the pace and dynamics of the emergency department require them to have a unique educational skillset. Most existing literature defining educational excellence in EM reflects educator rather than learner perspectives, and there is limited contemporary, resident-centered work that describes the teaching practices of exceptional EM educators. This study aimed to identify EM resident-defined practices that characterize the “best” EM educators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a qualitative thematic analysis to analyze open-ended survey responses from residents at a large, urban, 3 year EM residency program. All 78 residents were invited to complete an anonymous survey containing a single prompt to describe their best EM educator. Data were collected over 72 h in March 2025. Three investigators performed iterative open coding and applied constant comparative methods to identify themes. Postgraduate year (PGY) class was unblinded after analysis to explore patterns by training level.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-eight residents responded (48.7% response rate). Five themes emerged: (1) growth orientation, (2) psychological safety, (3) shares clinical burden, (4) educational expertise, including optimal timing and setting of teaching, knowledge translation, and fostering independence; and (5) clinical expertise, including content expertise and role modeling. In a secondary descriptive analysis, PGY-1s emphasized psychological safety, growth-oriented feedback, and autonomy, while PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents prioritized approachability, timely teaching, shared workload, and clinical expertise.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Residents identified outstanding EM educators as growth-oriented, supportive, skilled teachers and expert clinicians, with preferences varying by training level. These themes may guide faculty development, coaching, and feedback as well as future studies on resident-centered educator training.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.70211","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Effective clinical educators are essential to emergency medicine (EM) residency training, and the pace and dynamics of the emergency department require them to have a unique educational skillset. Most existing literature defining educational excellence in EM reflects educator rather than learner perspectives, and there is limited contemporary, resident-centered work that describes the teaching practices of exceptional EM educators. This study aimed to identify EM resident-defined practices that characterize the “best” EM educators.

Methods

We performed a qualitative thematic analysis to analyze open-ended survey responses from residents at a large, urban, 3 year EM residency program. All 78 residents were invited to complete an anonymous survey containing a single prompt to describe their best EM educator. Data were collected over 72 h in March 2025. Three investigators performed iterative open coding and applied constant comparative methods to identify themes. Postgraduate year (PGY) class was unblinded after analysis to explore patterns by training level.

Results

Thirty-eight residents responded (48.7% response rate). Five themes emerged: (1) growth orientation, (2) psychological safety, (3) shares clinical burden, (4) educational expertise, including optimal timing and setting of teaching, knowledge translation, and fostering independence; and (5) clinical expertise, including content expertise and role modeling. In a secondary descriptive analysis, PGY-1s emphasized psychological safety, growth-oriented feedback, and autonomy, while PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents prioritized approachability, timely teaching, shared workload, and clinical expertise.

Conclusions

Residents identified outstanding EM educators as growth-oriented, supportive, skilled teachers and expert clinicians, with preferences varying by training level. These themes may guide faculty development, coaching, and feedback as well as future studies on resident-centered educator training.

是什么造就了最好的教育者?急诊医学住院医师观点的定性分析
背景有效的临床教育工作者对急诊医学住院医师培训至关重要,急诊科的步伐和动态要求他们具有独特的教育技能。大多数现有的定义EM教育卓越的文献反映的是教育者而不是学习者的观点,并且当代以居民为中心的描述杰出EM教育者教学实践的工作有限。本研究旨在确定新兴市场居民定义的实践,这些实践是“最佳”新兴市场教育者的特征。方法:我们进行了定性的主题分析,以分析一个大型的、城市的、为期3年的新兴市场住院医师项目的居民的开放式调查反馈。所有78名居民被邀请完成一项匿名调查,其中包含一个提示,描述他们最好的EM教育者。数据于2025年3月在72小时内收集。三名调查人员进行了迭代开放编码和应用恒定的比较方法来确定主题。通过对研究生一年(PGY)班级进行盲法分析,探索培养水平的规律。结果38名居民回访,回复率为48.7%。五大主题包括:(1)成长导向;(2)心理安全;(3)分担临床负担;(4)教育专长,包括最佳教学时机和设置、知识翻译和培养独立性;(5)临床专业知识,包括内容专业知识和角色示范。在二级描述性分析中,pgy -1强调心理安全、以成长为导向的反馈和自主性,而PGY-2和PGY-3的住院医师优先考虑的是可接近性、及时教学、分担工作量和临床专业知识。结论:居民认为优秀的EM教育者是成长导向的、支持性的、熟练的教师和专家临床医生,他们的偏好因培训水平而异。这些主题可以指导教师发展、辅导和反馈,以及未来以住院医师为中心的教育工作者培训的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书