Experimental and machine learning investigation of hybrid FRP strengthened high strength concrete

Q2 Engineering
P. Sowmiyadevi, R. Arvind Saravan, C Vinothini, G. Nakkeeran, T. Subbulakshmi
{"title":"Experimental and machine learning investigation of hybrid FRP strengthened high strength concrete","authors":"P. Sowmiyadevi,&nbsp;R. Arvind Saravan,&nbsp;C Vinothini,&nbsp;G. Nakkeeran,&nbsp;T. Subbulakshmi","doi":"10.1007/s42107-026-01697-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the mechanical performance of high-strength concrete (HSC) incorporating silica fume (SF) as a supplementary cementitious material and waste glass aggregate (WGA) as a natural coarse aggregate replacement, with potential application in hybrid FRP-strengthened systems. Nine concrete mixtures were prepared with SF (0–20%) and WGA (0–100%) at a constant water-to-binder ratio of 0.38. Compressive strength (CS), tensile strength (TS), and flexural strength (FS) were evaluated at 7 and 28 days following IS standards. An optimal combination of 10–15% SF and 20–40% WGA achieved peak 28-day values of 72.8 MPa (CS), 6.02 MPa (TS), and 9.35 MPa (FS), exceeding M60-grade benchmarks by 10–15%. To predict mechanical properties, ensemble machine learning models including Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosting (GB) were developed. Among these, the GB model demonstrated superior predictive performance across all output variables, achieving higher coefficients of determination (R² = 0.9813, 0.9803, and 0.9791 for CS, TS, and FS, respectively) along with lower prediction errors (MAE and RMSE) compared to RF. Feature importance analysis revealed that cement content and SF were the most influential parameters governing strength development. The results indicate that optimized SF–WGA concrete can provide a sustainable alternative to conventional HSC, while GB-based models offer a reliable approach for strength prediction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"27 8","pages":"3947 - 3959"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-026-01697-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the mechanical performance of high-strength concrete (HSC) incorporating silica fume (SF) as a supplementary cementitious material and waste glass aggregate (WGA) as a natural coarse aggregate replacement, with potential application in hybrid FRP-strengthened systems. Nine concrete mixtures were prepared with SF (0–20%) and WGA (0–100%) at a constant water-to-binder ratio of 0.38. Compressive strength (CS), tensile strength (TS), and flexural strength (FS) were evaluated at 7 and 28 days following IS standards. An optimal combination of 10–15% SF and 20–40% WGA achieved peak 28-day values of 72.8 MPa (CS), 6.02 MPa (TS), and 9.35 MPa (FS), exceeding M60-grade benchmarks by 10–15%. To predict mechanical properties, ensemble machine learning models including Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosting (GB) were developed. Among these, the GB model demonstrated superior predictive performance across all output variables, achieving higher coefficients of determination (R² = 0.9813, 0.9803, and 0.9791 for CS, TS, and FS, respectively) along with lower prediction errors (MAE and RMSE) compared to RF. Feature importance analysis revealed that cement content and SF were the most influential parameters governing strength development. The results indicate that optimized SF–WGA concrete can provide a sustainable alternative to conventional HSC, while GB-based models offer a reliable approach for strength prediction.

Abstract Image

混杂FRP增强高强混凝土的试验与机器学习研究
本研究研究了含硅灰(SF)作为补充胶凝材料和废玻璃骨料(WGA)作为天然粗骨料替代品的高强混凝土(HSC)的力学性能,并在frp增强混合体系中具有潜在的应用前景。在水胶比为0.38的恒定条件下,以SF(0-20%)和WGA(0-100%)配制了9种混凝土配合比。抗压强度(CS)、抗拉强度(TS)和抗弯强度(FS)分别在IS标准后7天和28天进行评估。10-15% SF和20-40% WGA的最佳组合达到了28天峰值72.8 MPa (CS)、6.02 MPa (TS)和9.35 MPa (FS),比m60级基准高出10-15%。为了预测机械性能,开发了包括随机森林(RF)和梯度增强(GB)在内的集成机器学习模型。其中,GB模型在所有输出变量上都表现出优越的预测性能,与RF相比,具有更高的决定系数(CS、TS和FS分别为R²= 0.9813、0.9803和0.9791)以及更低的预测误差(MAE和RMSE)。特征重要性分析表明,水泥掺量和顺水密度是影响强度发展的主要参数。结果表明,优化后的SF-WGA混凝土可以替代传统的HSC,而基于gb的模型为强度预测提供了可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书