Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models of Binary Classification of Alzheimer Disease Using Longitudinal Non-imaging Data

Q1 Decision Sciences
Bukola Badeji-Ajisafe, Balikis Pelumioluwa Abdulraheem
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models of Binary Classification of Alzheimer Disease Using Longitudinal Non-imaging Data","authors":"Bukola Badeji-Ajisafe,&nbsp;Balikis Pelumioluwa Abdulraheem","doi":"10.1007/s40745-026-00679-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The brain is a mass of nerve tissue that controls all of our bodily and cognitive functions. It is susceptible to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). AD is a progressive and irreversible disease that leads to memory loss, continuous cognitive decline, and behavioral deterioration. Early identification of AD stages is crucial for timely intervention and improved patient care. This research compares the performance of multiple Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms trained with a longitudinal non-imaging dataset to classify individuals as either ‘Nondemented’ or ‘Demented’. The Support Vector Model (SVM), which is termed long_SVC, achieved the highest performance with an accuracy of 0.829 and an Area under Curve (AUC) of 0.830. The Random Forest model (long_RFC) was the second best, achieving an accuracy of 0.808 and an AUC score of 0.806. Deep learning (DL) approaches, including the long_1D-CNN model and long_LSTM-AE model, performed poorly in differentiating between ‘Non-demented’ and ‘Demented’. The long_1D-CNN model performed better than the long_LSTM-AE model; it had an accuracy of 0.566 and an AUC score of 0.585. The long_LSTM-AE has an accuracy of 0.533 and an AUC score of 0.558. The long_1D-CNN and long_LSTM-AE models had a log loss of 0.683 and 0.708, respectivel. This demonstrated the limited effectiveness of DL algorithms on small datasets. The outcomes showed that traditional machine learning approaches can outperform DL methods when working with limited longitudinal data. This research highlights the potential of the long_SVC model as a decision support tool in healthcare, helping doctors to come to an early diagnosis. Challenges related to real-world deployment, such as model interpretability for doctors, are discussed. Future studies could explore integrating this model into real-world healthcare settings to improve patient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36280,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Data Science","volume":"13 3","pages":"575 - 590"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40745-026-00679-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The brain is a mass of nerve tissue that controls all of our bodily and cognitive functions. It is susceptible to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). AD is a progressive and irreversible disease that leads to memory loss, continuous cognitive decline, and behavioral deterioration. Early identification of AD stages is crucial for timely intervention and improved patient care. This research compares the performance of multiple Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms trained with a longitudinal non-imaging dataset to classify individuals as either ‘Nondemented’ or ‘Demented’. The Support Vector Model (SVM), which is termed long_SVC, achieved the highest performance with an accuracy of 0.829 and an Area under Curve (AUC) of 0.830. The Random Forest model (long_RFC) was the second best, achieving an accuracy of 0.808 and an AUC score of 0.806. Deep learning (DL) approaches, including the long_1D-CNN model and long_LSTM-AE model, performed poorly in differentiating between ‘Non-demented’ and ‘Demented’. The long_1D-CNN model performed better than the long_LSTM-AE model; it had an accuracy of 0.566 and an AUC score of 0.585. The long_LSTM-AE has an accuracy of 0.533 and an AUC score of 0.558. The long_1D-CNN and long_LSTM-AE models had a log loss of 0.683 and 0.708, respectivel. This demonstrated the limited effectiveness of DL algorithms on small datasets. The outcomes showed that traditional machine learning approaches can outperform DL methods when working with limited longitudinal data. This research highlights the potential of the long_SVC model as a decision support tool in healthcare, helping doctors to come to an early diagnosis. Challenges related to real-world deployment, such as model interpretability for doctors, are discussed. Future studies could explore integrating this model into real-world healthcare settings to improve patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

基于纵向非成像数据的机器学习与深度学习阿尔茨海默病二分类模型的比较分析
大脑是一团神经组织,控制着我们所有的身体和认知功能。它易患神经退行性疾病,如阿尔茨海默病(AD)。阿尔茨海默病是一种进行性和不可逆转的疾病,可导致记忆丧失、持续认知能力下降和行为恶化。早期识别AD阶段对于及时干预和改善患者护理至关重要。本研究比较了使用纵向非成像数据集训练的多种人工智能(AI)算法的性能,将个体分类为“非痴呆”或“痴呆”。long_SVC支持向量模型(SVM)的准确率为0.829,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.830,达到了最高的性能。随机森林模型(long_RFC)排名第二,准确率为0.808,AUC得分为0.806。深度学习(DL)方法,包括long_1D-CNN模型和long_LSTM-AE模型,在区分“非痴呆”和“痴呆”方面表现不佳。long_1D-CNN模型优于long_LSTM-AE模型;其准确率为0.566,AUC评分为0.585。long_LSTM-AE的准确率为0.533,AUC分数为0.558。long_1D-CNN和long_LSTM-AE模型的对数损失分别为0.683和0.708。这表明DL算法在小数据集上的有效性有限。结果表明,在处理有限的纵向数据时,传统的机器学习方法可以优于深度学习方法。这项研究强调了long_SVC模型作为医疗保健决策支持工具的潜力,可以帮助医生进行早期诊断。讨论了与现实世界部署相关的挑战,例如医生的模型可解释性。未来的研究可以探索将该模型整合到现实世界的医疗保健环境中,以改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Data Science
Annals of Data Science Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Annals of Data Science (ADS) publishes cutting-edge research findings, experimental results and case studies of data science. Although Data Science is regarded as an interdisciplinary field of using mathematics, statistics, databases, data mining, high-performance computing, knowledge management and virtualization to discover knowledge from Big Data, it should have its own scientific contents, such as axioms, laws and rules, which are fundamentally important for experts in different fields to explore their own interests from Big Data. ADS encourages contributors to address such challenging problems at this exchange platform. At present, how to discover knowledge from heterogeneous data under Big Data environment needs to be addressed.     ADS is a series of volumes edited by either the editorial office or guest editors. Guest editors will be responsible for call-for-papers and the review process for high-quality contributions in their volumes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书