Mixed Methods Evaluation of Gaps and Barriers in Delivery of Precision Oncology in Advanced Lung Cancer.

Jacob N Stein, Alayah Johnson-Jennings, Courtney Canter, Mary E Grewe, Marjory Charlot
{"title":"Mixed Methods Evaluation of Gaps and Barriers in Delivery of Precision Oncology in Advanced Lung Cancer.","authors":"Jacob N Stein, Alayah Johnson-Jennings, Courtney Canter, Mary E Grewe, Marjory Charlot","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality and has well described disparities in outcomes. Significant survival gains in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been achieved due to precision oncology, however, shortfalls in its delivery will further exacerbate disparities. Patient navigation is an approach to address cancer care disparities. We sought to characterize the barriers and facilitators to precision oncology through a mixed methods approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional study of patient navigators, pathologists, and clinicians in North Carolina (NC). We conducted surveys and interviews to assess barriers and facilitators to effective delivery of precision medicine for patients with advanced NSCLC, including next generation sequencing (NGS) and use of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. We recruited both community-based and academic cancer providers across the state.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six participants completed the survey, with representation from both community and academic sites, and five completed interviews. Clinicians reported gaps in delivery of precision medicine as well as knowledge gaps, feeling \"not at all\" or \"a little bit\" knowledgeable about NGS (19%), liquid biopsy (32%) and targeted therapies (19%). Navigators endorsed common conversations about precision medicine but felt \"somewhat\" or \"very\" uncomfortable discussing NGS (38%), targeted therapies (31%), and limited confidence in resolving barriers. Qualitative interviews highlighted potential solutions including financial aid, dedicated pathology support, use of liquid biopsy, and partnership with social work.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Academic and community-based clinicians in N.C. reported gaps in delivery of precision oncology in advanced NSCLC. Navigators reported a significant role in precision oncology education and delivery but limited confidence in doing so. Qualitative data highlight potential strategies for improving access. These findings suggest a need for further interventions and education to support clinicians and navigators disseminating precision oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":73875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oncology navigation & survivorship","volume":"15 9","pages":"246-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13372248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oncology navigation & survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality and has well described disparities in outcomes. Significant survival gains in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been achieved due to precision oncology, however, shortfalls in its delivery will further exacerbate disparities. Patient navigation is an approach to address cancer care disparities. We sought to characterize the barriers and facilitators to precision oncology through a mixed methods approach.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of patient navigators, pathologists, and clinicians in North Carolina (NC). We conducted surveys and interviews to assess barriers and facilitators to effective delivery of precision medicine for patients with advanced NSCLC, including next generation sequencing (NGS) and use of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. We recruited both community-based and academic cancer providers across the state.

Results: Fifty-six participants completed the survey, with representation from both community and academic sites, and five completed interviews. Clinicians reported gaps in delivery of precision medicine as well as knowledge gaps, feeling "not at all" or "a little bit" knowledgeable about NGS (19%), liquid biopsy (32%) and targeted therapies (19%). Navigators endorsed common conversations about precision medicine but felt "somewhat" or "very" uncomfortable discussing NGS (38%), targeted therapies (31%), and limited confidence in resolving barriers. Qualitative interviews highlighted potential solutions including financial aid, dedicated pathology support, use of liquid biopsy, and partnership with social work.

Conclusion: Academic and community-based clinicians in N.C. reported gaps in delivery of precision oncology in advanced NSCLC. Navigators reported a significant role in precision oncology education and delivery but limited confidence in doing so. Qualitative data highlight potential strategies for improving access. These findings suggest a need for further interventions and education to support clinicians and navigators disseminating precision oncology.

混合方法评估晚期肺癌精准肿瘤治疗的差距和障碍。
背景:肺癌是癌症死亡的主要原因,并且在结果上有很好的描述差异。由于精确肿瘤学,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的生存率显著提高,然而,其交付的不足将进一步加剧差距。患者导航是解决癌症治疗差异的一种方法。我们试图通过混合方法来描述精确肿瘤学的障碍和促进因素。方法:我们对北卡罗来纳州(NC)的患者导航员、病理学家和临床医生进行了横断面研究。我们进行了调查和访谈,以评估对晚期NSCLC患者有效提供精准医疗的障碍和促进因素,包括下一代测序(NGS)和靶向治疗和免疫治疗的使用。我们在全州招募了社区和学术癌症提供者。结果:56名参与者完成了调查,其中有来自社区和学术机构的代表,并完成了5次访谈。临床医生报告了在提供精准医疗和知识方面的差距,对NGS(19%)、液体活检(32%)和靶向治疗(19%)“完全”或“一点”不了解。导航员支持关于精准医疗的常见对话,但在讨论NGS(38%)、靶向治疗(31%)以及解决障碍的信心有限时,他们感到“有些”或“非常”不舒服。定性访谈强调了潜在的解决方案,包括经济援助、专门的病理支持、液体活检的使用以及与社会工作的合作。结论:北卡罗来纳州的学术和社区临床医生报告了晚期非小细胞肺癌精准肿瘤治疗的差距。导航员报告了在精确肿瘤学教育和传递方面的重要作用,但对这样做的信心有限。定性数据突出了改善获取的潜在战略。这些发现表明需要进一步的干预和教育,以支持临床医生和导航员传播精确肿瘤学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书