Joseph L Austerweil, Shi Xian Liew, Nolan Conaway, Kenneth J Kurtz
{"title":"Creating Something Different: Similarity, Contrast, and Representativeness in Categorization.","authors":"Joseph L Austerweil, Shi Xian Liew, Nolan Conaway, Kenneth J Kurtz","doi":"10.1007/s42113-024-00209-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to generate new concepts and ideas is among the most fascinating aspects of human cognition, but we do not have a strong understanding of the cognitive processes and representations underlying concept generation. Previous work in this domain has focused on how the statistical structure of known categories generalizes to generated categories, overlooking whether (and if so, how) contrast between the known and generated categories is a factor. In this paper, we explore a different factor: contrast from known categories. We propose two novel approaches to modeling category contrast: one focused on exemplar dissimilarity and another based on the representativeness heuristic. Across three behavioral experiments, we find that people generate new categories that contrast from observed categories and distribute exemplars acoss \"unoccupied\" regions of stimulus space. The model based on the representativeness heuristic captured human category generation better when the known category was well captured by a Gaussian distribution. Conversely, the exemplar-based model captured human-generated categories better when the known category was not Gaussian distributed. Our results suggest contrast is a fundamental principle used in generating exemplars of a new category.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42113-024-00209-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":72660,"journal":{"name":"Computational brain & behavior","volume":"8 1","pages":"36-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13298683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational brain & behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-024-00209-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The ability to generate new concepts and ideas is among the most fascinating aspects of human cognition, but we do not have a strong understanding of the cognitive processes and representations underlying concept generation. Previous work in this domain has focused on how the statistical structure of known categories generalizes to generated categories, overlooking whether (and if so, how) contrast between the known and generated categories is a factor. In this paper, we explore a different factor: contrast from known categories. We propose two novel approaches to modeling category contrast: one focused on exemplar dissimilarity and another based on the representativeness heuristic. Across three behavioral experiments, we find that people generate new categories that contrast from observed categories and distribute exemplars acoss "unoccupied" regions of stimulus space. The model based on the representativeness heuristic captured human category generation better when the known category was well captured by a Gaussian distribution. Conversely, the exemplar-based model captured human-generated categories better when the known category was not Gaussian distributed. Our results suggest contrast is a fundamental principle used in generating exemplars of a new category.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42113-024-00209-5.