Creating Something Different: Similarity, Contrast, and Representativeness in Categorization.

Computational brain & behavior Pub Date : 2024-07-11 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s42113-024-00209-5
Joseph L Austerweil, Shi Xian Liew, Nolan Conaway, Kenneth J Kurtz
{"title":"Creating Something Different: Similarity, Contrast, and Representativeness in Categorization.","authors":"Joseph L Austerweil, Shi Xian Liew, Nolan Conaway, Kenneth J Kurtz","doi":"10.1007/s42113-024-00209-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to generate new concepts and ideas is among the most fascinating aspects of human cognition, but we do not have a strong understanding of the cognitive processes and representations underlying concept generation. Previous work in this domain has focused on how the statistical structure of known categories generalizes to generated categories, overlooking whether (and if so, how) contrast between the known and generated categories is a factor. In this paper, we explore a different factor: contrast from known categories. We propose two novel approaches to modeling category contrast: one focused on exemplar dissimilarity and another based on the representativeness heuristic. Across three behavioral experiments, we find that people generate new categories that contrast from observed categories and distribute exemplars acoss \"unoccupied\" regions of stimulus space. The model based on the representativeness heuristic captured human category generation better when the known category was well captured by a Gaussian distribution. Conversely, the exemplar-based model captured human-generated categories better when the known category was not Gaussian distributed. Our results suggest contrast is a fundamental principle used in generating exemplars of a new category.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42113-024-00209-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":72660,"journal":{"name":"Computational brain & behavior","volume":"8 1","pages":"36-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13298683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational brain & behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-024-00209-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to generate new concepts and ideas is among the most fascinating aspects of human cognition, but we do not have a strong understanding of the cognitive processes and representations underlying concept generation. Previous work in this domain has focused on how the statistical structure of known categories generalizes to generated categories, overlooking whether (and if so, how) contrast between the known and generated categories is a factor. In this paper, we explore a different factor: contrast from known categories. We propose two novel approaches to modeling category contrast: one focused on exemplar dissimilarity and another based on the representativeness heuristic. Across three behavioral experiments, we find that people generate new categories that contrast from observed categories and distribute exemplars acoss "unoccupied" regions of stimulus space. The model based on the representativeness heuristic captured human category generation better when the known category was well captured by a Gaussian distribution. Conversely, the exemplar-based model captured human-generated categories better when the known category was not Gaussian distributed. Our results suggest contrast is a fundamental principle used in generating exemplars of a new category.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42113-024-00209-5.

创造不一样的东西:分类中的相似性、对比性和代表性。
产生新概念和想法的能力是人类认知中最迷人的方面之一,但我们对概念产生的认知过程和表征还没有很好的理解。该领域以前的工作集中在如何将已知类别的统计结构推广到生成的类别上,忽略了已知类别和生成类别之间的对比是否(如果是,如何)是一个因素。在本文中,我们探讨了一个不同的因素:与已知类别的对比。我们提出了两种新的类别对比建模方法:一种是基于样本不相似性的方法,另一种是基于代表性启发式的方法。在三个行为实验中,我们发现人们产生的新类别与观察到的类别形成对比,并将样本分布在刺激空间的“未占用”区域。基于代表性启发式的模型在已知类别被高斯分布很好地捕获时能更好地捕获人类类别生成。相反,当已知类别不是高斯分布时,基于示例的模型更好地捕获了人类生成的类别。我们的结果表明,对比是一个基本原则,用于产生一个新的类别的例子。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1007/s42113-024-00209-5获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书