Risk Stratification to Optimize Colorectal Cancer Screening: Development and Validation of a Decision-Tree Model for Colonoscopy Prioritization

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
María Capilla-Lozano, Carmen Quiñones-Torrelo, Lucas Sebastián-Peris, José Miguel Carot-Sierra, Concepción Gómez-Medina, Inmaculada Lorca, Clara Alfaro-Cervelló, Pilar Aguilar, Susana Castán-Cameo, Silvia Gimeno-Martos, Marta Ponce-Romero, Isabel Pascual-Moreno, Arturo Carratalá-Calvo, Andrés Peña, David Martí-Aguado
{"title":"Risk Stratification to Optimize Colorectal Cancer Screening: Development and Validation of a Decision-Tree Model for Colonoscopy Prioritization","authors":"María Capilla-Lozano,&nbsp;Carmen Quiñones-Torrelo,&nbsp;Lucas Sebastián-Peris,&nbsp;José Miguel Carot-Sierra,&nbsp;Concepción Gómez-Medina,&nbsp;Inmaculada Lorca,&nbsp;Clara Alfaro-Cervelló,&nbsp;Pilar Aguilar,&nbsp;Susana Castán-Cameo,&nbsp;Silvia Gimeno-Martos,&nbsp;Marta Ponce-Romero,&nbsp;Isabel Pascual-Moreno,&nbsp;Arturo Carratalá-Calvo,&nbsp;Andrés Peña,&nbsp;David Martí-Aguado","doi":"10.1111/den.70224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening is effective; however, colonoscopy demand exceeds endoscopy capacity. Delays in colonoscopy after a positive test reduce screening effectiveness. We developed and validated a decision-tree model to stratify colorectal cancer risk among individuals with a positive test to prioritize colonoscopy for those at highest risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective study including participants with a positive fecal immunochemical test referred for colonoscopy within a Spanish regional population-based screening program (2021–2024). Individuals were randomly assigned to derivation (65%) and validation (35%) cohorts using a stratified random split. Fecal hemoglobin concentration, clinical and laboratory data were collected to develop the decision-tree model. The primary outcomes were colorectal cancer and advanced-stage colorectal cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1773 participants were included. Colorectal cancer was detected in 97 participants (5.5%), including 25 cases (1.5%) with advanced-stage disease. The model stratified participants into low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups. A progressive increase in the prevalence of colorectal cancer and advanced-stage disease was observed across risk groups in both cohorts (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The very high-risk group (fecal hemoglobin &gt; 100 μg/g and &gt; 65 years) included 6.7% of participants, with colorectal cancer and advanced-stage prevalence of 21.8% and 7.6%, respectively. Prioritizing colonoscopy for this group yielded a number needed to scope of 4.6 for colorectal cancer and 13.2 for advanced-stage disease, both significantly lower than the current one-size-fits-all strategy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A decision-tree model was developed to stratify the risk of colorectal cancer and optimize endoscopic resources in screening programs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":159,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"38 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/den.70224","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.70224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening is effective; however, colonoscopy demand exceeds endoscopy capacity. Delays in colonoscopy after a positive test reduce screening effectiveness. We developed and validated a decision-tree model to stratify colorectal cancer risk among individuals with a positive test to prioritize colonoscopy for those at highest risk.

Methods

Prospective study including participants with a positive fecal immunochemical test referred for colonoscopy within a Spanish regional population-based screening program (2021–2024). Individuals were randomly assigned to derivation (65%) and validation (35%) cohorts using a stratified random split. Fecal hemoglobin concentration, clinical and laboratory data were collected to develop the decision-tree model. The primary outcomes were colorectal cancer and advanced-stage colorectal cancer.

Results

A total of 1773 participants were included. Colorectal cancer was detected in 97 participants (5.5%), including 25 cases (1.5%) with advanced-stage disease. The model stratified participants into low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups. A progressive increase in the prevalence of colorectal cancer and advanced-stage disease was observed across risk groups in both cohorts (p < 0.001). The very high-risk group (fecal hemoglobin > 100 μg/g and > 65 years) included 6.7% of participants, with colorectal cancer and advanced-stage prevalence of 21.8% and 7.6%, respectively. Prioritizing colonoscopy for this group yielded a number needed to scope of 4.6 for colorectal cancer and 13.2 for advanced-stage disease, both significantly lower than the current one-size-fits-all strategy.

Conclusions

A decision-tree model was developed to stratify the risk of colorectal cancer and optimize endoscopic resources in screening programs.

Abstract Image

风险分层优化结直肠癌筛查:结肠镜检查优先级决策树模型的开发和验证。
背景与目的:基于粪便免疫化学试验的结直肠癌筛查是有效的;然而,结肠镜检查的需求超过了内窥镜检查的能力。阳性检查后结肠镜检查的延误降低了筛查的有效性。我们开发并验证了一种决策树模型,用于对检测呈阳性的个体进行结直肠癌风险分层,以优先考虑高危人群的结肠镜检查。方法:前瞻性研究包括在西班牙区域人群筛查计划(2021-2024)中进行结肠镜检查的粪便免疫化学测试阳性的参与者。个体被随机分配到衍生(65%)和验证(35%)队列使用分层随机分割。收集粪便血红蛋白浓度、临床和实验室数据,建立决策树模型。主要结局是结直肠癌和晚期结直肠癌。结果:共纳入受试者1773人。97例(5.5%)被检测出结直肠癌,其中25例(1.5%)为晚期疾病。该模型将参与者分为低、中、高和高危组。在两个队列(p 100 μg/g和bbb65岁)的风险组中,观察到结直肠癌和晚期疾病的患病率逐渐增加,包括6.7%的参与者,结直肠癌和晚期患病率分别为21.8%和7.6%。优先考虑结肠镜检查的人群,结直肠癌患者所需的范围为4.6,晚期疾病患者所需的范围为13.2,两者都明显低于目前的一刀切策略。结论:建立了一个决策树模型来对结直肠癌的风险进行分层,并优化内镜筛查方案中的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Endoscopy
Digestive Endoscopy 医学-外科
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
291
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Digestive Endoscopy (DEN) is the official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy and the World Endoscopy Organization. Digestive Endoscopy serves as a medium for presenting original articles that offer significant contributions to knowledge in the broad field of endoscopy. The Journal also includes Reviews, Original Articles, How I Do It, Case Reports (only of exceptional interest and novelty are accepted), Letters, Techniques and Images, abstracts and news items that may be of interest to endoscopists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书