[Combination of Manchester Triage System and chief complaint: development and internal validation of a new algorithm for patient flow management in integrated emergency centres].

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Domagoj Schunk, Milda Aleknonyte-Resch, Arvid Lepsien, Alina Balandin, Hans Jörg Busch, Florian Ketels, Sascha Thielke, Sebastian Wolfrum
{"title":"[Combination of Manchester Triage System and chief complaint: development and internal validation of a new algorithm for patient flow management in integrated emergency centres].","authors":"Domagoj Schunk, Milda Aleknonyte-Resch, Arvid Lepsien, Alina Balandin, Hans Jörg Busch, Florian Ketels, Sascha Thielke, Sebastian Wolfrum","doi":"10.1007/s00063-026-01475-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A central element of the emergency care reform in Germany is the establishment of integrated emergency centres (INZ) with a central point of assessment (ZE). This simulation study presents a new tool (L-MTS) combining the Manchester Triage System (MTS) with the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) chief complaint to identify patients with low urgency early, thereby decreasing the workload in the central emergency department (ZNA) while ensuring patient safety in the urgent care centre (AA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 38,639 adult self-presenting emergency patients (fNP) at two university hospitals (2024). Following randomization (70% training, n = 27,048/30% test, n = 11,591), chief-complaint-based outpatient rates were calculated as pretest probabilities. Using ROC analysis and the maximum Youden index, a 74% cutoff was defined for the allocation algorithm. This was refined into an optimized version (L-MTS opt.) by routing high-risk complaints directly to the ZNA. Internal validation within the test dataset was performed using decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration curves (Brier score), and bootstrapping (min. 5000 iterations).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Outpatient rates varied substantially depending on the chief complaint. Using L-MTS opt., the ZNA workload could be reduced by up to 44.3% of all fNP within the test dataset. This includes 12.9% of patients requiring secondary transfer from the AA to the ZNA. The proportion of AA patients requiring monitoring or who died was 0.20% and 0.14%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>L-MTS opt. substantially reduces emergency department overcrowding while maintaining high patient safety. The broad availability of the variables used and the high adaptability of the allocation algorithms allow for wide application of the system. The findings support the need for close spatial and organizational integration of ZNA and AA to optimize patient flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-026-01475-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A central element of the emergency care reform in Germany is the establishment of integrated emergency centres (INZ) with a central point of assessment (ZE). This simulation study presents a new tool (L-MTS) combining the Manchester Triage System (MTS) with the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) chief complaint to identify patients with low urgency early, thereby decreasing the workload in the central emergency department (ZNA) while ensuring patient safety in the urgent care centre (AA).

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 38,639 adult self-presenting emergency patients (fNP) at two university hospitals (2024). Following randomization (70% training, n = 27,048/30% test, n = 11,591), chief-complaint-based outpatient rates were calculated as pretest probabilities. Using ROC analysis and the maximum Youden index, a 74% cutoff was defined for the allocation algorithm. This was refined into an optimized version (L-MTS opt.) by routing high-risk complaints directly to the ZNA. Internal validation within the test dataset was performed using decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration curves (Brier score), and bootstrapping (min. 5000 iterations).

Results: Outpatient rates varied substantially depending on the chief complaint. Using L-MTS opt., the ZNA workload could be reduced by up to 44.3% of all fNP within the test dataset. This includes 12.9% of patients requiring secondary transfer from the AA to the ZNA. The proportion of AA patients requiring monitoring or who died was 0.20% and 0.14%, respectively.

Conclusion: L-MTS opt. substantially reduces emergency department overcrowding while maintaining high patient safety. The broad availability of the variables used and the high adaptability of the allocation algorithms allow for wide application of the system. The findings support the need for close spatial and organizational integration of ZNA and AA to optimize patient flow.

[曼彻斯特分诊系统和主诉的结合:综合急救中心病人流管理新算法的开发和内部验证]。
背景:德国紧急护理改革的一个核心要素是建立具有中心评估点的综合紧急中心(INZ)。本模拟研究提出了一种将曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)与加拿大急诊科信息系统(CEDIS)主诉相结合的新工具(L-MTS),以早期识别低紧急程度的患者,从而减少中央急诊科(ZNA)的工作量,同时确保紧急护理中心(AA)的患者安全。方法:回顾性分析两所大学附属医院(2024年)38639例自我表现的成人急诊患者(fNP)。随机化(70%训练,n = 27,048/30%检验,n = 11,591)后,以主诉为基础的门诊率作为预试概率计算。通过ROC分析和最大约登指数,为分配算法定义了74%的截止值。通过将高风险投诉直接发送到ZNA,这被改进为优化版本(L-MTS选择)。使用决策曲线分析(DCA)、校准曲线(Brier评分)和bootstrapping (min。5000次迭代)。结果:门诊率因主诉不同而有很大差异。使用L-MTS opt, ZNA工作负载可以减少测试数据集中所有fNP的44.3%。这包括12.9%需要从AA转到ZNA的患者。需要监测或死亡的AA患者比例分别为0.20%和0.14%。结论:L-MTS的选择大大减少了急诊科的拥挤,同时保持了患者的高度安全。所使用的变量的广泛可用性和分配算法的高适应性使系统得到广泛的应用。研究结果支持了ZNA和AA在空间和组织上紧密整合的必要性,以优化患者流量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书