Yasmin Rafiq, Shenglin Wang, Mohammed Al-Nuaimi, Lyudmila Mihaylova, Robert M Hierons, Sanja Dogramadzi
{"title":"Vision-based vs. IMU-based upper-limb pose estimation in assisted dressing: a comparative study of positional accuracy and kinematic fidelity.","authors":"Yasmin Rafiq, Shenglin Wang, Mohammed Al-Nuaimi, Lyudmila Mihaylova, Robert M Hierons, Sanja Dogramadzi","doi":"10.3389/frobt.2026.1844439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate estimation of upper-limb kinematics is essential for applications such as rehabilitation assessment and assistive robotics, yet remains challenging in real-world scenarios involving occlusion and physical human interaction. While vision-based pose estimation methods have advanced significantly, their ability to recover reliable joint kinematics under such conditions remains unclear. This paper presents a systematic comparison of vision-based and wearable sensing approaches for upper-limb pose estimation during assisted dressing tasks. A monocular RGB-based convolutional neural network (CNN) and a temporally smoothed variant (CNN_temporal) are evaluated alongside a wearable IMU-based reconstruction method. All approaches are compared against an inverse kinematics (IK) reference derived from VICON motion capture data using participant-specific kinematic models. Performance is assessed using both positional error, measured via global and shoulder-centred mean per-joint position error (MPJPE), and kinematic agreement, measured via elbow flexion/extension angle error. Experiments on a real-world dataset of assisted dressing trials, involving an occupational therapist and three participants, demonstrate that IMU-based estimation provides consistently accurate and stable joint-angle reconstruction (e.g., <math><mrow><mo>∼</mo> <mn>12</mn> <mo>°</mo></mrow> </math> mean absolute error). In contrast, vision-based methods achieve reasonable positional accuracy (MPJPE <math><mrow><mo>∼</mo></mrow> </math> 0.20 m) but exhibit substantially larger errors in joint-angle estimation (often exceeding 80 <math><mrow><mo>°</mo></mrow> </math> ), particularly under occlusion. Temporal smoothing improves positional consistency but does not preserve kinematic fidelity. These results highlight a fundamental limitation of current vision-based approaches for tasks requiring accurate joint kinematics. The findings suggest that integrating inertial sensing or incorporating biomechanical constraints may be necessary to achieve reliable pose estimation in real-world assistive scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":47597,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","volume":"13 ","pages":"1844439"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13368569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2026.1844439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate estimation of upper-limb kinematics is essential for applications such as rehabilitation assessment and assistive robotics, yet remains challenging in real-world scenarios involving occlusion and physical human interaction. While vision-based pose estimation methods have advanced significantly, their ability to recover reliable joint kinematics under such conditions remains unclear. This paper presents a systematic comparison of vision-based and wearable sensing approaches for upper-limb pose estimation during assisted dressing tasks. A monocular RGB-based convolutional neural network (CNN) and a temporally smoothed variant (CNN_temporal) are evaluated alongside a wearable IMU-based reconstruction method. All approaches are compared against an inverse kinematics (IK) reference derived from VICON motion capture data using participant-specific kinematic models. Performance is assessed using both positional error, measured via global and shoulder-centred mean per-joint position error (MPJPE), and kinematic agreement, measured via elbow flexion/extension angle error. Experiments on a real-world dataset of assisted dressing trials, involving an occupational therapist and three participants, demonstrate that IMU-based estimation provides consistently accurate and stable joint-angle reconstruction (e.g., mean absolute error). In contrast, vision-based methods achieve reasonable positional accuracy (MPJPE 0.20 m) but exhibit substantially larger errors in joint-angle estimation (often exceeding 80 ), particularly under occlusion. Temporal smoothing improves positional consistency but does not preserve kinematic fidelity. These results highlight a fundamental limitation of current vision-based approaches for tasks requiring accurate joint kinematics. The findings suggest that integrating inertial sensing or incorporating biomechanical constraints may be necessary to achieve reliable pose estimation in real-world assistive scenarios.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Robotics and AI publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research covering all theory and applications of robotics, technology, and artificial intelligence, from biomedical to space robotics.