Vision-based vs. IMU-based upper-limb pose estimation in assisted dressing: a comparative study of positional accuracy and kinematic fidelity.

IF 3.7 Q2 ROBOTICS
Frontiers in Robotics and AI Pub Date : 2026-07-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frobt.2026.1844439
Yasmin Rafiq, Shenglin Wang, Mohammed Al-Nuaimi, Lyudmila Mihaylova, Robert M Hierons, Sanja Dogramadzi
{"title":"Vision-based vs. IMU-based upper-limb pose estimation in assisted dressing: a comparative study of positional accuracy and kinematic fidelity.","authors":"Yasmin Rafiq, Shenglin Wang, Mohammed Al-Nuaimi, Lyudmila Mihaylova, Robert M Hierons, Sanja Dogramadzi","doi":"10.3389/frobt.2026.1844439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate estimation of upper-limb kinematics is essential for applications such as rehabilitation assessment and assistive robotics, yet remains challenging in real-world scenarios involving occlusion and physical human interaction. While vision-based pose estimation methods have advanced significantly, their ability to recover reliable joint kinematics under such conditions remains unclear. This paper presents a systematic comparison of vision-based and wearable sensing approaches for upper-limb pose estimation during assisted dressing tasks. A monocular RGB-based convolutional neural network (CNN) and a temporally smoothed variant (CNN_temporal) are evaluated alongside a wearable IMU-based reconstruction method. All approaches are compared against an inverse kinematics (IK) reference derived from VICON motion capture data using participant-specific kinematic models. Performance is assessed using both positional error, measured via global and shoulder-centred mean per-joint position error (MPJPE), and kinematic agreement, measured via elbow flexion/extension angle error. Experiments on a real-world dataset of assisted dressing trials, involving an occupational therapist and three participants, demonstrate that IMU-based estimation provides consistently accurate and stable joint-angle reconstruction (e.g., <math><mrow><mo>∼</mo> <mn>12</mn> <mo>°</mo></mrow> </math> mean absolute error). In contrast, vision-based methods achieve reasonable positional accuracy (MPJPE <math><mrow><mo>∼</mo></mrow> </math> 0.20 m) but exhibit substantially larger errors in joint-angle estimation (often exceeding 80 <math><mrow><mo>°</mo></mrow> </math> ), particularly under occlusion. Temporal smoothing improves positional consistency but does not preserve kinematic fidelity. These results highlight a fundamental limitation of current vision-based approaches for tasks requiring accurate joint kinematics. The findings suggest that integrating inertial sensing or incorporating biomechanical constraints may be necessary to achieve reliable pose estimation in real-world assistive scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":47597,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","volume":"13 ","pages":"1844439"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13368569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2026.1844439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimation of upper-limb kinematics is essential for applications such as rehabilitation assessment and assistive robotics, yet remains challenging in real-world scenarios involving occlusion and physical human interaction. While vision-based pose estimation methods have advanced significantly, their ability to recover reliable joint kinematics under such conditions remains unclear. This paper presents a systematic comparison of vision-based and wearable sensing approaches for upper-limb pose estimation during assisted dressing tasks. A monocular RGB-based convolutional neural network (CNN) and a temporally smoothed variant (CNN_temporal) are evaluated alongside a wearable IMU-based reconstruction method. All approaches are compared against an inverse kinematics (IK) reference derived from VICON motion capture data using participant-specific kinematic models. Performance is assessed using both positional error, measured via global and shoulder-centred mean per-joint position error (MPJPE), and kinematic agreement, measured via elbow flexion/extension angle error. Experiments on a real-world dataset of assisted dressing trials, involving an occupational therapist and three participants, demonstrate that IMU-based estimation provides consistently accurate and stable joint-angle reconstruction (e.g., ∼ 12 ° mean absolute error). In contrast, vision-based methods achieve reasonable positional accuracy (MPJPE ∼ 0.20 m) but exhibit substantially larger errors in joint-angle estimation (often exceeding 80 ° ), particularly under occlusion. Temporal smoothing improves positional consistency but does not preserve kinematic fidelity. These results highlight a fundamental limitation of current vision-based approaches for tasks requiring accurate joint kinematics. The findings suggest that integrating inertial sensing or incorporating biomechanical constraints may be necessary to achieve reliable pose estimation in real-world assistive scenarios.

辅助敷料中基于视觉与基于imu的上肢姿态估计:位置精度和运动保真度的比较研究。
上肢运动学的准确估计对于康复评估和辅助机器人等应用至关重要,但在涉及遮挡和物理人类交互的现实场景中仍然具有挑战性。虽然基于视觉的姿态估计方法已经取得了重大进展,但它们在这种情况下恢复可靠关节运动学的能力仍不清楚。本文对基于视觉和可穿戴的上肢姿态估计方法进行了系统的比较。基于rgb的单眼卷积神经网络(CNN)和时间平滑变体(CNN_temporal)与基于可穿戴imu的重建方法一起进行了评估。所有方法都与使用参与者特定运动学模型的VICON运动捕获数据派生的逆运动学(IK)参考进行比较。通过位置误差(通过全局和以肩部为中心的平均关节位置误差(MPJPE)测量)和运动学一致性(通过肘关节屈伸角度误差测量)来评估性能。一名职业治疗师和三名参与者在辅助敷料试验的真实数据集上进行的实验表明,基于imu的估计提供了一致准确和稳定的关节角重建(例如,平均绝对误差约为12°)。相比之下,基于视觉的方法实现了合理的位置精度(MPJPE ~ 0.20 m),但在关节角估计中表现出更大的误差(通常超过80°),特别是在遮挡下。时间平滑提高了位置一致性,但不能保持运动保真度。这些结果突出了当前基于视觉的方法对需要精确关节运动学的任务的基本限制。研究结果表明,在现实世界的辅助场景中,集成惯性传感或结合生物力学约束可能是实现可靠姿态估计的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
355
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Robotics and AI publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research covering all theory and applications of robotics, technology, and artificial intelligence, from biomedical to space robotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书