Internet healthcare in Chinese public hospitals: Towards high-quality development (1986-present).

Abstract

Background: Internet healthcare has become a key part of China's hospital-centered health system. Driven by "Internet Plus Healthcare", Healthy China 2030, and public-hospital high-quality development policies, it has evolved from remote consultation experiments into regulated online-offline care pathways. This review traces its development from the first documented remote medical practice in 1986 to the present, focusing on policy, institutional models, clinical evidence, governance challenges, and reform.

Methods: We conducted a structured narrative review of English- and Chinese-language sources on internet healthcare in Chinese public hospitals. PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and official policy sources were searched. Eligible sources addressed internet hospitals, telemedicine, online follow-ups, remote monitoring, e-prescriptions, insurance payments, digital governance, clinical outcomes, patient safety, equity, or implementation barriers in mainland China.

Results: Internet healthcare progressed through early telemedicine, institutional network expansion, internet-hospital development, and pandemic-driven normalization. The 2018 regulatory framework positioned internet hospitals as extensions of licensed physical medical institutions, thereby permitting online follow-ups for common and chronic diseases while preserving offline accountability. During COVID-19, online consultation, e-prescriptions, drug delivery, and insurance payments rapidly expanded. Evidence suggests benefits for chronic disease management, medication adherence, cardiovascular secondary prevention, and reduced travel burden. However, evidence remains limited for diagnostic accuracy, adverse events, emergency escalation, and long-term outcomes. Persistent barriers include quality variation, workload, cybersecurity, data fragmentation, artificial intelligence (AI) accountability, reimbursement design, regional inequity, and digital exclusion among older adults.

Conclusion: China's model may be understood as a hospital-centered extension of public-hospital functions rather than a stand-alone virtual-care system. Future development should prioritize outcome-based evaluations, safety governance, equitable access, data interoperability, and accountability for internet-based and AI-assisted care.