The importance of osteopathic mentorship during medical school, residency, and beyond for surgical subspecialties: review of literature.

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Klea Agollari, Anthony Modica, Adam Bitterman
{"title":"The importance of osteopathic mentorship during medical school, residency, and beyond for surgical subspecialties: review of literature.","authors":"Klea Agollari, Anthony Modica, Adam Bitterman","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Quality mentorship for medical students and resident physicians throughout their medical education has been shown to be beneficial in supporting students in their academic and professional endeavors. There is no standardized approach for providing mentorship across institutions, and many students feel that they do not receive adequate mentorship. There is a paucity of literature about osteopathic mentorship, which is important to address due to the unique set of challenges faced by osteopathic medical students and residents.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aims to evaluate the quality and availability of osteopathic mentorship in medical education and to identify areas of improvement and barriers for implementing structured mentorship programs across institutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed and ClinicalKey was conducted to explore current practices for mentorship within the training world of medicine, focusing on osteopathic mentorship throughout medical school and residency training. Recommendations for improving mentorship and developing standardized approaches were derived.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mentorship was strongly associated with improved specialty choice and residency match outcomes. Students prioritized honest feedback (75.4 %), responsiveness (70.8 %), and networking (60.8 %). Structured mentorship programs demonstrated high effectiveness, including a 100 % categorical surgery match rate in one cohort and significant perceived benefit (p<0.05). Osteopathic students reported limited mentorship (59.0 %) and significantly greater degree-based bias than allopathic peers (73.7 % vs. 16.0 %; p=0.001), with fewer research and mentorship opportunities. Targeted mentorship initiatives increased specialty interest (odds ratio [OR]=1.43; p=0.003) and improved match outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mentorship has been demonstrated to be beneficial in medicine for both medical students and residents. Mentorship is very valuable to help osteopathic medical students match competitive specialties for residency and to maximize their potential. Residents at training programs with established and well-structured mentorship programs demonstrated greater satisfaction and success.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Quality mentorship for medical students and resident physicians throughout their medical education has been shown to be beneficial in supporting students in their academic and professional endeavors. There is no standardized approach for providing mentorship across institutions, and many students feel that they do not receive adequate mentorship. There is a paucity of literature about osteopathic mentorship, which is important to address due to the unique set of challenges faced by osteopathic medical students and residents.

Objectives: This review aims to evaluate the quality and availability of osteopathic mentorship in medical education and to identify areas of improvement and barriers for implementing structured mentorship programs across institutions.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed and ClinicalKey was conducted to explore current practices for mentorship within the training world of medicine, focusing on osteopathic mentorship throughout medical school and residency training. Recommendations for improving mentorship and developing standardized approaches were derived.

Results: Mentorship was strongly associated with improved specialty choice and residency match outcomes. Students prioritized honest feedback (75.4 %), responsiveness (70.8 %), and networking (60.8 %). Structured mentorship programs demonstrated high effectiveness, including a 100 % categorical surgery match rate in one cohort and significant perceived benefit (p<0.05). Osteopathic students reported limited mentorship (59.0 %) and significantly greater degree-based bias than allopathic peers (73.7 % vs. 16.0 %; p=0.001), with fewer research and mentorship opportunities. Targeted mentorship initiatives increased specialty interest (odds ratio [OR]=1.43; p=0.003) and improved match outcomes.

Conclusions: Mentorship has been demonstrated to be beneficial in medicine for both medical students and residents. Mentorship is very valuable to help osteopathic medical students match competitive specialties for residency and to maximize their potential. Residents at training programs with established and well-structured mentorship programs demonstrated greater satisfaction and success.

骨科指导在医学院、住院医师和外科专科之后的重要性:文献回顾。
背景:在医学生和住院医师的医学教育过程中,高质量的指导已被证明对支持学生的学术和专业努力是有益的。没有标准化的方法来提供跨机构的指导,许多学生觉得他们没有得到足够的指导。关于整骨疗法指导的文献很少,由于整骨疗法医学学生和住院医生面临的独特挑战,解决这一问题很重要。目的:本综述旨在评估医学教育中骨科指导的质量和可用性,并确定跨机构实施结构化指导计划的改进领域和障碍。方法:对PubMed和ClinicalKey进行了全面的搜索,以探索医学培训领域中指导的当前实践,重点关注贯穿医学院和住院医师培训的整骨疗法指导。提出了改进指导和发展标准化方法的建议。结果:师友关系与改善的专业选择和住院医师匹配结果密切相关。学生优先考虑诚实的反馈(75.4 %),响应(70.8 %)和网络(60.8 %)。结构化的师徒计划显示出很高的有效性,包括在一个队列中100% %的分类手术匹配率和显著的感知效益(p结论:师徒关系已被证明对医学生和住院医生都有益。指导是非常有价值的,以帮助骨科医学生匹配有竞争力的专业实习,并最大限度地发挥他们的潜力。在已建立和结构良好的指导计划的培训项目中,住院医师表现出更大的满意度和成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书